Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By Live Free or Die (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Bombshell! New Pentagon Pics Released Prove NO PLANE Struck The Pentagon – It Was A Missile!!!

Monday, March 10, 2014 5:02
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
0
Get FREE private and secure Email and Messaging click now!

(Before It's News)

This transcript from Defense.gov of Donald Rumsfeld stating that a missile hit the Pentagon just got tremendous backing as the entire 9/11 hoax falls apart due in part to the newly released videos below which clearly shows that NO PLANE hit the Pentagon on 9/11. For those who still CANNOT believe their eyes, listen once again to Donald Rumsfeld.:

 

“It is a truth that a terrorist can attack any time, any place, using any technique and it’s physically impossible to defend at every time and every place against every conceivable technique. Here we’re talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filed with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center. The only way to deal with this problem is by taking the battle to the terrorists, wherever they are, and dealing with them.”

 

The ‘terrorists’, Donald, are in Washington DC and in the ‘global government’ and America has quickly awoken to that fact! These new pics/videos help to prove YOUR OWN WORDS!

 

Get FREE private and secure Email and Messaging click now!
Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 69 comments
  • In the first video, at 54 seconds, are those wheels part of landing gear? I don’t know… just asking.

    • Yes it is, but it doesn’t look anywhere near big enough to be from a commercial airplane

      NO WAY, it is off something much much smaller but similar to the front of an aircraft in design IMO

    • Those wheels were probably pasted on the missile.
      Just think for example North Korea makeshift toy airplanes disguised as a garbage toy airplane but a missile. :eek:

    • At 38 seconds there is a closer shot of those wheels. IMO, they are not from a plane and are probably smaller than a cars wheel. If you look closely, you can see what looks to be tanks and a hose draped over them. This would lead me to believe that it is an oxygen-acetylene torch cart.

    • They look more like the the set up you would find on some sort of moveable equipment. There is a hose and control box (the hose is orange and the control box is green with an instrument panel attached to a black upright piece that is attached to the wheel axel).

    • This is a long video but it’s well worth watching.

      9/11 Pentagon Attack – Behind the Smoke Curtain – Barbara Honegger

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fvJ8nFa5Qk&feature=youtu.be

      https://archive.org/details/BTSC-051113D

      Another video which is longer, but covers all of the 9/11 attacks:

      September 11 — The New Pearl Harbor

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DOnAn_PX6M

  • Last photo is not NEW! Been on the net for quite some time. Other OLD photos show holes in the interior walls as well. Obvious, by now to many, that what hit the Big P wasn’t a GIGANTIC AIRLINER whose engines would have been torn off it if it had come in at that low of an altitude! Some type of cruise missile is more realistic.

    • Two big ass engines would travel way further in to the building than a flimsy cockpit, that would concertina like a pancake

      No way two engines could NOT survive the impact or any resulting fire

      America is like a Disney Movie, un-f-ing-believable !

  • There isn’t much new here and certainly no more proof than we already have that 911 was a lie.

    • Yip as usual another American lie. Deceitful untrustworthy and obnocious, that the new America. Roll over and take one for the team.

  • It was a missile with landing gear.

    or

    The military stored various airplane parts in that section so they would be present afterwards during the “investigation”.

    or

    it was a radio controlled bomber jet painted to look like a passenger jet that crashed into that section after launching it’s missiles.

    or

    it was explosives that did the damage to the building and the light poles by the roadway and again, airplane parts were stored there so they would be present during the “investigation”.

    • The part the missile hit was “under renovation”. So yes, it’s where the airplane parts were kept until it was hit.

    • If you couldn’t tell, I was being sarcastic.

  • Either its a plane or not a plane, what is it? I was IN the World Trade Center when it struck. IT WAS A PLANE! I dont want to hear you stupid conspiracy theories on this crap.
    You have jackasses claiming that WHEELS were”pasted” on the missiles. How stupid can you get?
    All of these theories are illogical and logistically are impossible, yes impossible. None of you hold ANY degree is phsyics, or building design so shut your damn pie holes!

    • Oh really??? Well I was on TOP of the No. 2 WTC and it was a Missile!*

      Prove me wrong!

      *Trolls ALWAYS try to justify their pathetic lies they’re paid to try and cover-up.

      • i was on the street below the towers and saw the planes. prove ME wrong!

    • You weren’t referring to my comment were you johndoey?

      I just presented several theories which were based on conjecture with no facts to support them. This is “In Search Of” Hosted by Leonard Nimoy.

      Of course if you want the truth, you could watch Ancient Aliens.

      Articles like this is why BIN is the Weekly World News of Conspiracy Theories.

      Actually, it was BatBoy who did it.

  • Either its a plane or not a plane, what is it? I was IN the World Trade Center when it struck. IT WAS A PLANE! I dont want to hear you stupid conspiracy theories on this crap.
    You have jackasses claiming that WHEELS were”pasted” on the missiles. How stupid can you get?
    All of these theories are illogical and logistically are impossible, yes impossible. None of you hold ANY degree is physics, or building design so shut your damn pie holes!

  • Barbara Olson would probably disagree, if she were alive.

  • This is so old I don’t even know what to say. How about “after it’s news and debunked a million times.” 3rd picture is where one of the landing gear went through. If you find pictures that are taken before the collapse and after some of the cleanup you will see where the wings struck. The wings are 174 feet across and the openings where those hit are 174 feet across. They were not strong enough to take out the columns. If you look at these pictures you can see what I am talking about. If one believes this crap, then I guess you have the right to be ignorant. If you are seriously looking for answers, which I have done myself 11 years ago, than you will do due diligence on both sides to get them and if you do so I know you will come to the same conclusion as me. It was a plane.

  • If you guys have any understanding about bunker buster missiles, which would have been the only option for a penetrated attack this magnitude, you would get the point that when the bunker buster enters, it leaves a small hole with some dust and scrabble. It travels for some time, depending on the detonation timer setting before it explodes and vastes everything whereever it did enter.

    Does that hole look like a bunker buster missile hole to you? With all that carbage outside?

    Do you homework guys.

    Cheers.

  • If you still believe the Pentagon Attack was as they say, then I suggest you watch this investigation.

    The Light Poles are the smoking gun.

    http://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com/nsa.html

    Since when does the FBI confiscate CCTV video camera evidence for Justice?

    I absolutely believe it was a missile from the direction of the blast.

    All that belief does for me, is inform me those in power are willing to do whatever it takes to hold unto the delusion they have created.

    • The only two possibilities that I’ll entertain is a cruse missile or a shape chargers planted prior to 11-Sep-2001………

  • http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/weapons/q0223.shtml

    Tomahawk cruise missile of the Royal Navy in flight with wings deployed^

  • I lived in ArIngton, Va the year of 9/11. I worked for the architecture firm that was doing the Pentagon renovation at that time. I remember that the gov didnt want any pictures taken of the site. However since they were doing the renovation, pictures were taken. DMJM / Holmes
    & Narver was the company name.

    • You are correct. That part of the building was off limits to personnel at that time , also. due to the renovations, before the plane hit.

  • It was due to a EMP caused by Planet X. Read
    http://poleshift.ning.com/xn/detail/3863141:Comment:967509

  • Both hit. An A-3 Skywarrior and a Global Hawk cruise missile. An A-3 is 14 feet tall to the tip of the tail and has a 66 oot wingspan. See the US Coast Guard Report at the supremelawcenter.org. This is the report endorsed by Major General (ret) Albert Stubblebine in his assessment that a Boeing 757 DID NOT ht the pentagon. Numerous photos prove an A-3 AND Global Hawk did impact the pentagon on 9-11-2001. Get on it PLEASE.

  • Adding to my previous comment that it was a bunker buster missile.

    http://science.howstuffworks.com/bunker-buster.htm

    Please keep up with the facts will you guys.

    cheers.

    • Global Hawk. Numerous photos of Global Hawk parts(pre Jmolester) at the US Coast Guard report on what hit the pentagon on 9-11-2001.

  • What difference does it make Do you really think you are going to change anything in this country with this old video? You can change the future but not the past!

    • First off that is so Hilary Clinton I would rather puke.

      The Truth is and will be what makes the difference my friend. Jesus Christ is the Way the Truth and the Life. Believing a lie that the government is not capable of such things is to be delusional.

      The power you have is knowing and understanding the reality of what that truth means.

      I’ll start you out with a couple:

      1. The perceived rule of law is toast.
      2. That means they can destroy your world by saying oops.
      3. They can and will do whatever they want to complete their agenda.

      If you want my belief, I know Satan’s desire has always been to be God. These lies that we clearly see here, they will be truth revealed and replaced by an even bigger lie. And that liar will bring perceived justice to the ones who lacked a true love of the truth.

      But what do I know?

  • First let me say that the speaker on these pic sounds as if he is stoned, have any of you that think anything other than a plane hit the trade centers and the pentagon witnessed a plane crash? What is a plane? basically it is a huge missal, with wings, do any of you know what the wings are made of? what the fuselage is made of? Do you know what heat can do to steal, what heat can do to plastic? Do you have any idea how hot the fires were? I have issues with a lot of things taken place in America, but I do not at all think what is discussed here has any truth what so ever. Take your energy and drive that you guys have on this topic and channel it to the real issues here, like the attack on our constitution,

  • Look, get serious. We know that the ‘shadow gov’ did it so they could invade Afghanistan and Iraq; and get The Patriot Act passed without a fuss…so now we are f’d, and what are you going to do about it? That’s all that matters, the rest is playing mind games….

  • There is only one flaw to theory, missiles do not create firestorms. The missile would have had to contain napalm or another gel fire chemical. I have never heard of such a missile. Watch videos from Iraq when missiles hit buildings, or IEDS blow up, you do not see massive amounts of fire. This is why the Russians accused the Isrealis of using tactical nukes in Syria. Due to the amount of fire and heat produce from a bunker buster missile. Most explosives are compression explosions, not fire.
    However, it is very odd that there is no film of the real impact of the plane. A smaller plane with a missile attached to it could have created this damage. A large plane would have torn to pieces prior to hitting the building at the speeds they claim. Not to mention, any engineer will tell you that a jet would crumble upon impact. The gas explosion would go outward, not forward. So I am saying the government is lying, but, it was more complex than just any old Titan missle

  • Asks, if it WASN’T the airliner, then WHERE are the passengers? And the crashed airplane? And a black box? And the evidence that FAA and traffic control records track the airliner from it’s planned course ALL THE WAY into the Pentagon !? I don’t know the physics of a crash, but the engines are made of lightweight magnesium and titanium, BOTH burn very hot and leave little ash.

    • BombR76 wing mounted engines would have made holes in the walls, as Busta Myth observed above. Global Hawk is an unmanned plane with a fuselage-mounted engine.

      No, on the tracking. The transponders were turned off over Pennsylvania and the airplane
      descended. It landed and the passengers embarked on another plane. The Global Hawk drone is what flew to the Pentagon.

  • Well it took a long time for this to surface. Just for example, the phantom airliner should have had two engines 9 feet in Dia., made by either GE or RR, yet no engine debries of this type were found.
    What was found was a 2 foot compressor made by Pratt & Whitney that is used exclusively by our Air Force in Drones.
    We do not need to go into the no luggage debries, or the 200 foot wide aircraft

  • This is a fun one, trying to post here has locked up each of 3 different PC’s before the text could be finished or posted.
    The question is where did the engines go?
    They should have been there.

    Two 9 foot Dia GE or RR

  • “The only way to deal with this problem is by taking the battle to the terrorists, wherever they are, and dealing with them.”

    Well the only terrorist dealing we seem to be doing is Arming them ..Thanks Obungler. Can we have Our Billions back. Nothing like using American dollars to Arm Our Enemies-putz.

  • A Global Hawk drone is an unmanned airplane. It carries 3,000 pounds of ordnance. The fuselage is the same size as the hole in the Pentagon.

    The engine is in the fuselage. There are no wing mounted engines. The wings are light weight composite material.

  • I think a missile hit the pentagon but this narrator sucks! You sound dumb and you kill our cause with this narration ! Pls sound educated and make sense talkin about burnt trees! A missile hit the pentagon and if it was a plane which it wasn’t that would burn trees to. Pls if you can’t speak proper English don’t ruin our cause by sounding so juvenile in a video :smile:

  • If you compare the double wheels and the attached leg seen on the first video at 0:38 (on the right hand side of the frame)

    It looks very similar is size, style and color to the rear wheels on the following drone

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:RQ-4_Global_Hawk.jpg

    Hmm :?:

  • I visited this site 3 days after the incident. I took about 600 pics. I can honestly say that there was no airplane big or small. So if it was a Boeing that crashed into the building why did the twin towers and this one look wY different, hardly any smoke, hardly and fire. A guard that stood there told me that he never saw any airplane but did see a torpedo like bomb. This was as usual an insider government job and nobody is interested to investigate this further. But one day the day of reckoning will come to pass.

  • Yes, there is a nose wheel unit setting there.

    • It wouldn’t matter if these people had been standing right in front of the whole thing and watched the plane crash into the building. They are convinced that Hollywood implants holograms in everyones heads. They cannot be reasoned with. They cannot be taught what is real, truthful or accurate.

      They must create an excuse to justify the hate that they harbor. Here, they create many excuses.

      • CrowPie you’re not doing any reasoning. Just name-calling. And, you’re using the wrong names. People who talk about holograms in this case are properly termed, “disinformation agents.”

        I’m not responsible for people who are paid to muddy the water.

        April Gallop was there, at the Pentagon. http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=15787

        There is nothing plausible about the official story of 9-11. If you had seen it as a Hollywood movie, you’d be complaining about how unrealistic the story is. And that’s just on the face of it.

        Jim Gartenberg was at WTC 1 — trapped below the plane impact, below the fire, due to damage from explosives that blew out the core of the building. He was on the phone talking to WABC live, until he told them he was trapped BELOW the fire.

        And let’s not forget the BBC anchor and reporter, who doggedly stuck to their script and reported the collapse of WTC 7 — before it happened. Steel frames of skyscrapers do not collapse in fires, never. How did BBC know WTC 7 would fall down.

        That’s just on the face of it.

      • I have a family member that was an employee at the pentagon at the time of the attack.

        High level….Not a hack intern. So turn your finger wagging to yourself. I Know what happened. I don’t need the likes you to educate me.

        Go back to your conspiracy push pins. I rely on facts…Not fiction.

  • The planes that hit the WTC were empty military drones and were controlled by serial rapist and mass murderer Richard Cheney.
    The missile that hit the pentagon was fired by him as well. If you would like to verify this, the records are in several locations. The Hall of Records, the Hall of Justice, and the Hall of Research and other libraries as well.

  • All of this post event photo analysis is well and good, however, I worked with 15 people who were working in a conference room in the SSA’s administrative law judges location in Arlington who were looking eye to eye with the passengers on that plane as it was on its way into the Pentagon.

    You can spend all the time in the world spinning fantasies about what hit that building, but, these people were eye witnesses to the event. They saw the plane go right past their building and into the Pentagon. So, basically this whole video is bullshi!.

  • WHY ISN’T THE BLACK AREA THAT IS COVERED IN SMOKE knock out from the wing span on the plane?it just shows one hole,! Were are all of the planes parts? Were is the tail piece from the plane?

  • I just have a question that hopefully some of you can chime in on.

    Assuming that the gov used crudely painted drones to look like commercial airlines to crash into the WTC and the Pentagon:

    What happened to all those passengers that supposedly died?

    With Boston Hook, people say everyone associated with the blast we’re actors (or patsies).
    With Sandy Hook people say Lanza never even existed, and the people involved were actors.

    I’m just trying to understand this because it’s been proven clear as day that an aircraft traveled towards the pentagon from the NORTH and not the alleged south angle therefor making it an impossibility an aircraft hit the pentagon.

    What about all the people reported to be on that plane? Were they fake entities? If the people on Flight 77 didn’t crash in to the pentagon…

    Where are they now? Where is the flight crew, where is the passengers?

    Flight 77 did not crash in to the pentagon. So where the f**k did the passengers go?

    • Its always about assumptions. You list a lot of things.. perhaps connected, perhaps not.. but in each of the things you mention. There are oddities, some large some small.

      I would say trust only what you can verify yourself… and be wary of assuming others assumptions.

      Boston bombing for example – go look at the actual footage of the explosions. If your looking with your own eyes some things should stand out right away. The “bag” detonates runners fall down, with a row of unaffected police officers between the two. Seems odd to me and unlikely, considering a few things basic things about explosions, 1. concussive shock wave. 2. Shrapnel. Now if one or two officers had been hit, then maybe a few were just lucky, but when the entire row of officers is fine and barely reacts… something is odd with that.

      Sandy Hook – What did you actually see on that day? Then start asking yourself how many of the early reports were followed through and what was with all the weird behavior. When I started looking in that, here is where I started, what can I personally verify. For me crying, grief, pain. The nice things about humans, is when they start crying the physical manifestations are all the same. Swollen, red irritated eyes, over production of mucus, difficulty swallowing, breathing patterns change. You can fake a tear, but your really have to cry to get rest of it. You have probably cried at some point, or know others who have, watch with your own eyes and return to the myriad of interviews on that day and start your comparison.

      So on to 9/11 – there are a laundry list of oddities with this one, the news footage shows the start of it and weirdness just keeps on going from that point. Even how they handled the debris from that day… trucks were tracked with GPS and the steel shipped to china? Its start to finish odd. Do some follow up work on some of the witnesses that were saying explosions from day 1.

      As a vet what I can honestly tell you is this. If you are not in charge, you are expendable and those who are running the show have no concern about how many bodies they have to pile up to keep themselves safe.

      Your answer to your question is found in the fact that, if what is said in conspiracy circles is true, they already killed 3000 people with the buildings, whats a few more. When people can do such things to begin with, no amount of blood is going to make them feel any regret. Polpot, Stalin, etc.

    • Its always about assumptions. You list a lot of things.. perhaps connected, perhaps not.. but in each of the things you mention. There are oddities, some large some small.

      I would say trust only what you can verify yourself… and be wary of assuming others assumptions.

      Boston bombing for example – go look at the actual footage of the explosions. If your looking with your own eyes some things should stand out right away. The “bag” detonates runners fall down, with a row of unaffected police officers between the two. Seems odd to me and unlikely, considering a few things basic things about explosions, 1. concussive shock wave. 2. Shrapnel. Now if one or two officers had been hit, then maybe a few were just lucky, but when the entire row of officers is fine and barely reacts… something is odd with that.

      Sandy Hook – What did you actually see on that day? Then start asking yourself how many of the early reports were followed through and what was with all the weird behavior. When I started looking into that, here is where I started, what can I personally verify. For me crying, grief, pain. The nice things about humans, is when they start crying the physical manifestations are all the same. Swollen, red irritated eyes, over production of mucus, difficulty swallowing, breathing patterns change. You can fake a tear, but your really have to cry to get rest of it. You have probably cried at some point, or know others who have, watch with your own eyes and return to the myriad of interviews on that day and start your comparison.

      So on to 9/11 – there are a laundry list of oddities with this one, the news footage shows the start of it and weirdness just keeps on going from that point. Even how they handled the debris from that day… trucks were tracked with GPS and the steel shipped to china? Its start to finish odd. Do some follow up work on some of the witnesses that were saying explosions from day 1.

      As a vet what I can honestly tell you is this. If you are not in charge, you are expendable and those who are running the show have no concern about how many bodies they have to pile up to keep themselves safe.

      Your answer to your question is found in the fact that, if what is said in conspiracy circles is true, they already killed 3000 people with the buildings, whats a few more. When people can do such things to begin with, no amount of blood is going to make them feel any regret. Polpot, Stalin, etc.

    • @toddshelton Its always about assumptions. You list a lot of things.. perhaps connected, perhaps not.. but in each of the things you mention. There are oddities, some large some small.

      I would say trust only what you can verify yourself… and be wary of assuming others assumptions.

      Boston bombing for example – go look at the actual footage of the explosions. If your looking with your own eyes some things should stand out right away. The “bag” detonates runners fall down, with a row of unaffected police officers between the two. Seems odd to me and unlikely, considering a few things basic things about explosions, 1. concussive shock wave. 2. Shrapnel. Now if one or two officers had been hit, then maybe a few were just lucky, but when the entire row of officers is fine and barely reacts… something is odd with that.

      Sandy Hook – What did you actually see on that day? Then start asking yourself how many of the early reports were followed through and what was with all the weird behavior. When I started looking into that, here is where I started, what can I personally verify. For me crying, grief, pain. The nice things about humans, is when they start crying the physical manifestations are all the same. Swollen, red irritated eyes, over production of mucus, difficulty swallowing, breathing patterns change. You can fake a tear, but your really have to cry to get rest of it. You have probably cried at some point, or know others who have, watch with your own eyes and return to the myriad of interviews on that day and start your comparison.

      So on to 9/11 – there are a laundry list of oddities with this one, the news footage shows the start of it and weirdness just keeps on going from that point. Even how they handled the debris from that day… trucks were tracked with GPS and the steel shipped to china? Its start to finish odd. Do some follow up work on some of the witnesses that were saying explosions from day 1.

      As a vet what I can honestly tell you is this. If you are not in charge, you are expendable and those who are running the show have no concern about how many bodies they have to pile up to keep themselves safe.

      Your answer to your question is found in the fact that, if what is said in conspiracy circles is true, they already killed 3000 people with the buildings, whats a few more. When people can do such things to begin with, no amount of blood is going to make them feel any regret. Polpot, Stalin, etc.

  • @ Johndoey; The twin towers WERE hit by planes…but went down due to explosives. The Pentagon however, was NOT hit by a plane. Watch; 9/11 Conspiracy Theory, In Plane Site. it is by far the best video i have seen on the topic. It offers real close up evidence. It’s only a “Theory” until there is evidence…then it becomes a Conspiracy!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnNbVb99_6U

  • Yes, well known no plane struck the Pentagon. No tail is scene nor the wings and the hole is too small to permit an entire plane inside.

    THEY LIED TO YOU. That is why the FBI confiscated all the cameras around that area, from gas stations to stores cameras.

    When one camera did catch it clearly was not a plane but some fast moving cylindrical object.

  • Wow… This proves what happens when England dumps off it’s criminals and insane, and they have 164 years of inbred procreation… Talk about a genetic deficiencies.. :lol:

    This guy is a few shrimps short of the barbie… :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

    • OOPS… I guess they took that Australian guy’s comment off… oh well… :lol:

  • Another piece of garbage reporting. So what happen to the photos of the main landing gear inside the building, I don’t think missile have those now do they.

  • Beforeitscrap

    IMO you all need to take medication. Your talking about wheels and your own viewing of what you see. None of your comments mean anything if its your opinion. unless you are some type of aviation expert and/or build plans for a living, then I might take your opinion, but not from some hipster who wears tight pants and takes everything they see and read on the net as literal and truth.

  • This site really breaks it down…..very good info.
    http://home.comcast.net/~skydrifter/exp.htm

  • captbob

    mY wife guess that years ago. Ask your wife what she thinks.

  • I watch these videos from the Pentagon and from the World Trade Center, and it allways gets to me that they are incomplete. I am one who believes the truth is complete. To present the incomplete is to alter the truth, or to embellish it. What we all are doing is looking for the complete truth.

    In this case, for example, the fellow mentions the standing lampstandards and signs, but with no indication of the alledged trajectory of the plane.

    But I guess the pictures that aren’t shown are the most telling, 12-24 hours after the attack and explosion roughly 40 flatbed trailer loads of apparently mechanical debris was being moved from the site, most of the loads were tarped and hard to identify. Witnesses nearby however did state seeing 2 allmost complete airliner engines being trucked away.

    So, if people uninvolved with the government can see and talk about that, what does that say to us?

  • AgainstEVILZionist-MASTERMIND-of-IlluminatiNWO

    Don’t forget, the evil Satanic Illuminati Rothschild Empire, actually founded DANGEROUSLY nuclear-armed and increasingly uncontrollable War-Criminal Israel (see http://www.blissful-wisdom.com/rothschild-sponsored-zionism-world-banking-control-and-israel.html, Rothschild sponsored Zionism, World Banking Control, and Israel), on the Genocidal blood of the Indigenous Palestinians, and the’UNDESIRABLE’ European traditional/poor Jews (for Israel), through the Satanic Illuminati collaboration of Zionist-German Nazis!

    And then, the Zionist-Nazis, post WW2, in order to control America, absolutely (including by recruiting the German Nazis into the CIA), see – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4x-cHySUlw , Illuminati Satanism [Documentary] About Satanic Rituals , by EYEOFILLUMINATI2012 (note: Strangely the link does not work at Google or Yahoo – go straight into You Tube website and print: Illuminati Satanism [Documentary] About Satanic Rituals + EYEOFILLUMINATI2012); and at – http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=55408
    9/11 and Zion: What Was Israel’s Role?

    By Nick Kollerstrom on August 31, 2012

    Nick Kollerstrom (with Jim Fetzer) – Veterans Today August 22, 2012

    A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious, but it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly. But the traitor moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. – Marcus Cicero, to the Roman Senate, 42 BC.

    One may feel shocked by this title. Zionists have such a grip upon “The Guilt Industry”, virtually a monopoly, politically speaking. Was 9/11 an inside job? America was in some degree seeded with the perpetration of this event, from outside, and various echelons of its security services and military then responded by co-operating and then weaving a Muslims-did-it story.

    That is the hypothesis we will here examine. So when Netanyahu said the very next day, ‘This is very good for Israel”, he wasn’t just blurting out something indiscreet, he was publicly congratulating the various agents who had worked so hard….. (Read further) :mad:

  • missile or jet drone. It sure wasn’t an air liner.
    Who gets arrested first?
    Is there a job opening for executioner yet?

  • G

    I was in the plane and it never happened.

    this is not new and clearly we who have brains that work know, no plane hit that building cause if it had, that hole would be much wider and plane parts would be littered all over that lawn.

    How stupid can people be with this plane hit the building fakery.

Top Stories
Recent Stories
Follow us Facebook Twitter RSS

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story
Share This Story:
Print this story
Email this story
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Share on Tumblr
GET ALERTS:

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.