Michael Rivero Punches Holes in the Latest Twin Towers Collapse Theory
| Wikimedia Commons |
9/11 researcher and former NASA scientist, Michael Rivero, issued a rebuttal to the new theory of how the Twin Towers could have collapsed after being struck by planes. The salient point that is made by Christen Simensen of SINTEF, a research organization in Norway, as detailed in Aluminum International Today is that molten aluminum from the airplanes chemically reacted with water in the buildings’ sprinkler systems, which set off the explosions that brought down the Twin Towers.
“The reaction he is talking about is one in which hot aluminum will ‘steal’ oxygen from water, leaving hydrogen gas. There are two problems with this theory, of course.
The first is the hydrogen gas is very light and floats upward even faster than helium. The ruins of the World Trade Towers were ‘porous’ and as the smoke trails prove, there was a strong wind from the side. This means that hydrogen could not collect together anywhere in any amounts enough to cause an explosion, certainly not down in the basements, where some explosions were reported.
Second, even under the most ideal of circumstances of perfect mixture of hydrogen and oxygen, impossible in the natural atmosphere and under those conditions, hydrogen may burn fast but does not detonate. Recall the destruction of the Hindenburg. Huge fire, no ‘bang.’
So this latest official ‘explanation’ is a desperate attempt to reconcile eyewitness reports and video recordings of explosions (like the one that initiates the collapse of building 7) with the rapidly collapsing official story.
In any event, this new ‘aluminum’ theory does NOT address all the evidence for a conspiracy. The aluminum theory does not explain how the United States Secret Service knew it was safe to leave George Bush sitting at that school reading about goats, with an airport just four miles away, nor does it explain how the BBC reported the collapse of building 7 twenty six minutes before it actually happened.
Finally, given that aluminum is a rather common building material, why have we not seen such water and aluminum explosions before or since 9-11?”
As for Building 7? Simensen agrees with the official government report.
We welcome your comments, as well as comments from other experts who wish to critique the latest Twin Towers collapse theory.
Please also visit Michael Rivero’s website What Really Happened, which has been a premier resource for tracking and analyzing the catalogue of deceptions surrounding the events of September 11th.
Source for this story:
http://news.yahoo.com/twin-tower-collapse-model-could-squash-9-11-201204097.html?cache=clear
Source:
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
| Online: | |
| Visits: | 1,599,604,682 |
| Stories: | 8,139,637 |
Whistler Blowers, Insiders
Why was molten metal found burning in the basement of the towers a month later? Thermite creates its own oxygen supply and burns at a temperature of 4000F. also removing the steel from the sites and shipping it to China is a crime becaus evidence was removed from the largest crime scene in history.400 trucks day and night for days doesn’t make sense.
When are you kids going to get around to reading Activist Post: Architects and Engineers Question…Comments section? You waiting for the jewish mob to bump us all off? All you had to do was get 4 of us out into the light at seperate locations. Thanx. I and many others have known of the preset for 43 or more years. Given that nanothermate was invented much later, it must be concluded that along with the customized jet ramming job, a retriggering of the existing sytem occured. Between Rivero, Rense, Dawson,and even Gordon Duff’s interviews and reviews, less than ONE HOUR of material exists involving all builders of the WTCs put together. This leaves the rest of us with the investigating as to why. I intend to ask each why and even though my comments have gotten me up to 116,300,000 results as “Howard T. Lewis III”(now 5,000), I expect telephones slammed down on me because of the CIA-Jesuit Waltz. Ten years is enough time to report for duty. Someone else should lead the charge, but here goes.
Before I go, the molten metal has two causes, one of which is the creation of chunks of corium, like that in the puddle 30 feet below the basement floor of the Fukushima 1,2,and 3. Nukes were used to reduce the basement cement in WTC I,II,and 7.
Jet fuel burns at 500-590 F
Aluminum melts at 2020 F
Fail
Micheal Rivero is correct on this one, ‘Activist Post’.
It is a damned shame that the usual Cointelpro ‘NGOs’ are making comments on this story, as well as others (/story/1136/979/Letter_To_A_9_11_Truth_Skeptic.html ( ‘A Letter To A Nine-Eleven Truth Skeptic’) trying to divert attention by claiming that the ‘Joos’ [all by themselves] or the ‘nookes’ [or 'directed-energy weapons'] are solely responsible for the worldwide conspiritory cooperation of the PTB who are directly responsible for the outcome of this conspiracy that led to the deaths (directly) of over 2,700 people on United states soil, and the deaths of untold millions over the past 40+ years, along with the nazification and abrogation of the Constitutions of various Sovereign nations (including, but not limited to, the United States).
CORRECTION to some ‘anonymous’ post:
JP1, in a ‘controlleed burn’, can exceed 1,800 degrees ‘F’. Mild carbon steel begins to deform at +-2,100 degrees farenheight (losing 50% of its’ ‘parent strength’). The Underwriters’ Laborotories certified the steel used in the WTC complex to be able to withstand a temperature of 1,800 degrees for a time space of 3 hours, without exceeding its’ ‘elastic’ limits (still structurally able to support the weight it was designed for without noticable deformation).
The temparatures generated by JP1, when placed into an uncontrolled burn (open atmosphere) generally cannot exceed 1,200 ‘F’, and are not enough to cause the liquefaction of SIMPLE low-annealed bauxite, much less the high grades of ‘aluminium’ that are used in civilian aviation.
HOWEVER, if magnesium is added to ‘clean’ aluminium (such as in the case of Porche engine cases versus Volkswagen engine cases), high friction in machine processes can propogate an electrochemical reaction (high-carbon steel machine tools without a WATER-BASED COOLANT reacting with the magnesium content), causing a similar reaction to the various thermitic substrates that have been discovered since the 1920′s.
WATER (H2O) neither propogates nor mitigates this reaction (in other words, HAS NO SUBTANTIAL EFFECT).
In order for reactionary magnesium (used in a small percentage [less than 5% of the aircraft structural members] of the airframes of commercial airliners) to have the described ‘effect’, it would have to be in an atmosphere in whixh the OXYGEN content approached 70%+. THIS PPRECLUDES THE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS (WATER IN IRON PIPES).
Way back, I used to go out to the desert and burn Porshe aircooled engine cases. All that the water did was TURN TO STEAM when we tried to cool it off (no evidence of this from the video coverage ‘that day’).
YEAH. RIGHT! The aluminum airframes reacted with water to cause the ‘swiss-cheese’ TOTAL FAILURES of 110 stories of steel.
That is like saying tht Google really DID’T CENSOR ‘Activist Post’, or that the JOOS and NOOKS ‘dun’ 9/11 (oops, i forgot JOODY Woods, and the ‘directed energy weapons’ bullshit).
THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE.
I am
MontgomeryScott