Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Something Else Hit the Pentagon on 9/11 – Updated II!

Thursday, December 25, 2014 7:41
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

 

NOTE: DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Erases Rumsfeld’s interview. See near the bottom of the article for details.

 

It has been over fourteen years since ‘terrorists’ attacked our country on 9/11. It is those whom that hate our liberties, freedom, and the way of life. On the morning of September 11, 2001, American Airlines Flight 77, a Boeing 757-223 aircraft, took off at 8:42 am from Washington Dulles International Airport on its way to Los Angeles International Airport.  At 9:37:46 am EST, the official report stated that Flight 77, traveling at 530 mph, crashed into the Pentagon. Flight 77 somehow managed to get through the most heavily defended airspace and most protected and then crashed into the largest military headquarters in the world.

Let’s examine and take a good hard look at what happened on that frightful morning.

You can download the official report here: http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf

According to the news anchor, she stated, “the American Airlines jet landed short of the Pentagon.” CNN’s correspondent Bob Franken who was at the Pentagon stated, “from my close up inspection there’s no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon” … “the only pieces left that you can see or small enough that you can pick up in your hand’ …“There are no large tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage” …” which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon”.

According to Professor Fetzer, Bob Franken was reprimanded for his live on the air comments which later when seen on air again he stated, “Only a fool would deny that a plane hit the Pentagon.”

Now, let’s see what Mrs. April Gallup had to say because she was inside of the Pentagon when it happened. The moment that American Flight 77 was said to have crashed into the Pentagon Mrs. April Gallop had thought that she had triggered a bomb as soon as she turned on her computer.  After the initial explosion, her son was completely blown out of his stroller. She got up enough strength to go and find her son, which she could not locate. There was an area with a pack of debris, so she and some others climbed over it, but before doing so, she was able to locate her son. She grabbed her son, and she proceeded to climb out with her son over her shoulders and got out of that particular location that had collapsed. Mrs. Gallup came out of where the initial impact took place and came out of the lawn closest to the highway. 

Mrs. Gallup stated, “I hadn’t seen any evidence of metal, airplane seats, no luggage, nothing that would give me indication that it was a plane that hit the building.” “I didn’t have any jet fuel over my body.” Not her, her son or anyone else had jet fuel on their body. “There was nothing in the inside that would give me any indication that there was a plane on that particular day that hit the building.”

Do to the fact that what she had gone through because she thought her judgment might have been impaired, she asked others in the area, and it was conclusive. No one else saw in that area where I was, located saw any parts of any planes or luggage or baggage, or anything of that nature…”

“Children under the age of 17 are allowed into the Pentagon if they are with an adult with a DOD Building Pass”: http://www.pfpa.mil/documents/Acceptable_ID.PDF

What do you see in this picture? It looks just like the firefighters are putting out a fire at the Pentagon with a very pristine looking lawn. Do you see any evidence of an airplane crash whatsoever? Yes, we did see later on that there was debris supposedly from American Flight 77.

As you can see in this image, there is no debris and firefighters had almost had extinguished the fire, who happened to be in the area right when the Pentagon got attacked.

Here is a short clip from the documentary ‘Zero’ discussing the lack of debris:

There were reports of billows of smoke coming from the Pentagon, which was almost extinguished. But long and behold, the smoke was coming from dumpsters in front of the Pentagon as discovered by Professor Fetzer in Midwest 9/11 Conference Part 2. Please watch starting from the 31 minute mark where he begins to discuss the Pentagon on 9/11.

 

Fake Smoke Machines at the Pentagon on 9/11: http://letsrollforums.com/fake-smoke-machines-pentagon-t23757.html?s=9a245abb8ba290dbb6eccae4bd5bc77f&

Back to the debris:

Professor Fetzer stated that a C-130H (Hercules), which he discusses in MidWest 9/11 Truth Conference Part 2, was seen circling the Pentagon and that it must have dropped the debris. A&E did interview Lt. Col. O’Brien, who piloted the C-130H (Hercules), of the Minnesota Air National Guard’s 133rd. On the morning of September the 11th, Lt. Col O’Brien took off from Andrew’s Air Force Base. When asked the question by A&E, he stated that the accusation was absurd. Professor Fetzer asked the question, “Where else could it of come from?”

Here is the footage of a C-130, which was flying around the Pentagon shortly after the explosion about 2 minutes.

A still from the video above:

A still from the video below:

Credit to Pilotsfor911Truth: “Bruce Looney took the following photograph from Ft McNair.”

Why are these two men tampering with evidence with the crash site where terrorism has just been committed?  It appears as if they are spreading debris over the Pentagon lawn.

This image was taken right after the initial impact of ‘something’ hitting the Pentagon.

Source: Professor Jim Fetzer

The collapse of the side of the Pentagon wall occurred about 45 minutes after the impact of the object hitting the Pentagon. There were no broken windows adjacent to this hole. There was no evidence of any wing marks on the building where a 757 measures 126 “ 10’ from wing to wing.  Nor any indications in the upper floors where the tail, which stood 44 feet 6 inches from the ground would have made an impact. And what happened to Flight 77’s engines that made of titanium? There was no evidence on the walls where the engines should have impacted, the heaviest and strongest part of the plane. Criminal elements and government stooges suggest that the engines had vaporized. Yeah right. Titanium doesn’t even melt unless it reaches 1668 Celsius or 3034.40 Fahrenheit.

- Pratt & Whitney / Roll Royce engines

- 12′ x 9′ Diameter Titanium steel alloy

- 6 tons each

- Melting point of titanium: 1,668°C  (3034.40°F)

- Max burning Temp of Jet-Fuel: 1120°C

(after 40 minutes only if the fuel source is maintained)

The only engine part located in the wreckage is the one pictured below. It was at one point claimed to be a Honeywell rotor from the rear ‘APU’ engine in a Boeing 757’s tail-section. The high-resolution photos of the ‘rotor’ in question were scrutinized and studied, of which Honeywell then stated, “there is no way that is any part of an APU engine we manufacture.”

Karl Schwartz, former GOP Strategist, Patmoz Nanotechnologies Inc. security systems CEO recognize the part as a JT8D Turbo from the US Air Force A-3 Skywarrior.

“The only piece of wreckage that appears ‘genuine’ in the FEMA photo is the front shaft bearing housing from the US Air Force A-3 Skywarrior or something very similar.

Only 4 or 5 still existed on 911, and they were stored at Hughes Aircraft in Van Nuys, CA, now better known as RAYTHEON, a big war profiteer.

Source: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_90.htm

Source: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_90.htm

The air traffic controllers at Dulles thought the blip was a military jet.

Hani Hanjour was the hijacker that supposedly flew American Flight 77 into the Pentagon. He had difficulty controlling and landing a single engine Cessna 172, two weeks into August after three test runs. Please see the documentary from ‘Loose Change’ 9/11 Documentary, starting from the 13 minute and 45 second mark:

The Jason Ingersoll Photo Collection: http://www.thepentacon.com/Topic7.htm

The image below shows where American Flight 77 supposedly came through to its last resting place located in the C ring.

Why does it say “Punch Out.” According to Professor Fetzer, “The Pentagon walls are about ten to twelve feet thick. Which are Six feet thick of brick, three feet of concrete and three feet of limestone.” So a Boeing 757 was able to manage somehow to go through three rings E, D, and C made out of aluminum alloy? You’re kidding, right? And according to Professor Fetzer, it appears to have been punched out with chlorate military explosives, to give it a false impression that part of the plane went all the way through this hole. Professor Fetzer also mentions that if part of the plane had gone through at an angle, it would have created an asymmetrical hole and not a hole that appears to be too symmetrical. 

Source: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_90.htm

Source: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_90.htm

The ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers) in January of 2004 released its Pentagon Building Performance Report and a video computer analysis as to what supposedly happened when American Flight 77 allegedly hit the Pentagon.

 

What’s significant about this report, was that the 18.5-inch steel reinforced concrete walls were omitted and overlooked. Secondly, the tail section intact as it entered Pentagon and left no entry point. Thirdly, they didn’t use any engines in the simulation. And lastly, they claimed to have taken out 50 support columns? The official report states that the support columns were taken out, but the photographic evidence shows otherwise.

http://www.911research.wtc7.net/cache/pentagon/official/asce_pentagon.pdf

There was no fire damage; computers were intact, and the desks were intact.

The official report said Flight 77 took out all these wall structures and support beams, but photo and video evidence speaks for itself and shows the north side (left side) was completely intact.

This piece of debris as you see down below comes from a Boeing 757, but not American Flight 77. The debris appears as if it was peeled off with no signs of it being exposed to intense heat or a violent crash.

http://www.boeing.com/boeing/commercial/757family/pf/pf_200tech.page

http://www.boeing.com/boeing/commercial/757family/pf/pf_200back.page

There was a piece of vine not indigenous to the Arlington; Virginia vicinity that was attached to the corner of this piece of debris. Newspaper James Hanson who earned his law degree from the University of Michigan – College of Law was able to trace back the piece of debris to a rain forest above Cali, Columbia where a crash occurred in 1995, as discussed in the Midwest 9/11 conference Part 2.

JIM HANSON’S DE-VINE REVELATION:

 http://frustratingfraud.blogspot.kr/2007/04/jim-hansons-de-vine-revelation.html

Glen Stanish is the founder for 9/11 Truth. He has 20 years as a professional airline pilot.  He has also studied aviation incidents and accidents, and stated in ‘9/11 Ripple Effect’ that no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon because there would have been an abundance of wreckage. Large tail sections, indestructible landing gear, indestructible engines, wing spars, fuselages, seats, etc. 

You will hear the Glen Stanish interview here: 

A group called Citizens Investigative Team reported that there were witnesses that saw a plane fly toward the Pentagon north of the Citgo Station. The witnesses stated that an airplane flew about 300 feet in the air and approached the Pentagon. A truck driver named Dave Bawl saw a plane fly over the Pentagon and then swerve over it as soon as there was an explosion. What a way to help fool everyone into believing the official story that people did witness a plane. Dave was found dead in an abandoned building weeks later. 

The green line in the image is the direction of American Flight 77 according to the official story of which it would have taken it south of the Citgo station.

The official story stated that American Flight 77 maintained this trajectory of flying 20 feet above the ground for 3280 feet before hitting the Pentagon, traveling at 530 mph hour. The official report also stated Flight 77 took out five lampposts before hitting the Pentagon. It did this without its wings falling off, ripping off, tumbling out of control, or bursting into flames? This act not only defies the law of aerodynamics, but Newton’s third law as well.

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/12/08/911-update-proof-no-boeing-757-hit-pentagon/

And according to Newton’s third law, a plane traveling 500 mph hitting a stationary lamppost would have the same effect as fixed plane being hit by a lamppost going 500 mph.

CNN (one of many propaganda machines) conducted a case study on the Pentagon.  The utter nonsense that they put out to believe that a Boeing 757 can survive hitting five light poles, let alone one light pole traveling at over 500 miles an hour. Their explanation of the fish-eyed lens is ridiculous as well. 

Watch this newsreport from Local 12 in Tampa, Florida report on a flock of birds that hit the leading edge of this Southwest Airliner and the damage it sustained. This was just done by a flock of birds. Now, imagine a plane hitting five lamposts and still being able to crash without exploding due to the fuel inside the wings, without tumbling out of control, and still being able to penetrate two thick walls of the Pentagon. Really?

Plane Crash Kills 3; was to pick up ex-president Bush: http://edition.cnn.com/2004/US/11/22/texas.crash/

“The cause of the crash — just south of Hobby Airport — was not immediately known. Television station KHOU reported that the plane had apparently clipped a light pole prior to the crash.”

airplane wing is cut off by wooden telephone pole

Fred Fox is a former U.S. Navy and a 33-Year commercial pilot for American Airlines. He stated that not even a seasoned American test pilot could have flown a T-category aircraft like the 757 would have flown into the first floor of the Pentagon because of something called, “Ground Effect.” Professor Fetzer explains “Ground Effect,” in Midwest 9/11 Conference Part 2. It is the accumulation of pocket of compressed gas beneath the fuselage, which meant that the plane could not even get lower than 60ft to 80ft to the ground, traveling at that speed.

9/11 Ripple Effect Documentary – Ground Effects

Listen to what Captain Russ Wittemberg has to say about all of this right after Dario Fo (Nobel Peace Prize Winner) in the documentary, ‘Zero’. It defies the laws of Physics! He was 30 years flying experience in total coming from the military and flying for civilian aviation.

Here is a short clip from the documentary ‘Zero’ where Capt. Russ Wittemberg gives his interviews:

“I challenge any pilot, any pilot anywhere: give him a Boeing 757 and tell him to do 400 knots 20 feet above the ground for half a mile. Can’t do. It’s aerodynamically impossible.”  – Nila Sagadevan, pilot and aeronautical engineer

Please Watch ZERO: An Investigation Into 9-11 (Full Documentary)

Condoleezza Rice had denied any ideas that airplanes would be used as weapons or even against the Pentagon according to Professor Fetzer. And within a year prior to 9/11, a simulation was conducting using a Boeing 757 hitting the Pentagon.

Speaking of simulation and drills, did you know that there were drills going on before 9/11 as well as on the day of 9/11, which caused utter confusion? Also note that there was 2.3 trillions dollars missing. The team “Able Danger”, who were investigating the missing 2.3 trillion dollars/nukes were called into an emergency meeting on the day of 9/11 at the Pentagon. They were at the exact spot as to where Flight 77 allegedly hit. Please have a listen to Representative Cynthia McKinney drill Rumsfeld:

The Military Drills of September 11th: Why a New Investigation is Needed

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-military-drills-of-september-11th-why-a-new-investigation-is-needed/6906

Llyod A. England is a crucial (witness) who allegedly had a light pole (#1), smash right through the windshield of his taxi, which was furthest from the pole. He states that he pulled the pole out minutes after it struck his windshield. He states that he had help from an unknown bystander came by to help him take the pole out of his taxi. You can see that there is no damage to the hood of the car. According to the Virginia Department of Transportation, the pole was 40 ft weighing 247 lbs. Here is the interview. It is very interesting, which Mr. Lloyd A. England stated that his wife was an employee of the FBI.

9/11 Cab driver Lloyd Edward – Interview! (Short version) 

Notice the C-130 flying in the background in the image above.

No damage to the hood!

Lloyde England and His Taxi Cab – ‘The Eye of the Storm’ documentary.

According to a theory by the group Citizens Investigative Team of the “Eye of the Storm”, they believe that the poles could have been staged by the following means. It was just shortly after the explosion; traffic was being blocked on southbound Route 27 just before the bridge. A witness saw a man on the road trying to flag her down to get her to stop, but the woman refused. She was forced to get off the Columbia Pike exit just north of the bridge.

According to the investigator in “Eye of the Storm”, there were no witness reports of Pole #1 entering the cab of Lloyde Edward. There were no reports of the cab spinning out sideways with the pole sticking out over the hood as Mr. Edward has stated.  No witness reports seeing the pole in the taxi cab whatsoever. There are only about 20 folks who mention the pole, which was already on the road after the event.

So how were the poles then staged? The area was under control by Pentagon and Arlington police. The Pentagon police control the three out of the five poles. The Virginia of Transportation managed the other two poles and would not provide information to the filmmakers of the locations of the other two poles. One possibility was the renovations that week at the Pentagon were to be completed and scheduled to close down at the time. 

President Bush had left the heliport on 9/10 and was scheduled to arrive back 9/11 at noon as confirmed by Heliport control Sean Boger, which means that the Secret Service could control the area without people asking why. They received confirmation from a Pentagon renovation contractor that they were moving around trailers on 9/10.

The Pentagon had 86 separate cameras. Why didn’t they show us the video footages from all the different angles if it was a plane that hit the Pentagon? The FBI confiscated all of the video footage, but in 2006, the FBI was forced to yield due to the Freedom of Information Act, releasing four footages. 

The 86 cameras at the Pentagon:

This snapshot below comes from the Pentagon Building Performance Report, which can be found here: 

http://www.911research.wtc7.net/cache/pentagon/official/asce_pentagon.pdf

This image is from the following website: “You can determine what is a solid object, and what is not. You clearly see a line of dense (but not solid) white exhaust, trailing a solid narrow lineal object.”

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_90.htm

Again from the same website:

And another illustration from the website again: 

Legendary Jack White, who is a photo analyst, was asked to scale an image of a Boeing 757 into the frame as per a kind request by Professor Fetzer.

Do to a lawsuit that was filed and won in a court of law, this video footage was from the morning of September 11, 2001 of the Pentagon that released in 2002. According to the hotel manager, the FBI confiscated the footage. The news anchor even states, “It shows the explosion that followed the crash of American Airlines Flight 77 into the Pentagon, but the video does not show the airplane.”

“I heard a very loud, quick whooshing sound. I was convinced it was a missile. It came in so fast – it sounded nothing like an airplane.”   Lon Rains – Editor for Space News (Pentagon eyewitness)

UPDATE: The Department of Defense has removed this article. You will have to view the waybackmachine. Copy and paste the link from below and you shall find the statement by Rumsfeld that it was a missile.

 https://archive.org/web/

Donald Rumsfeld back in 2001, told ‘Parade Magazine’ about the missile damage which can be found right here: 

http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?TranscriptID=3845

Secretary Rumsfeld Interview with Parade Magazine

Presenter: Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld

October 12, 2001

(Interview with Lyric Wallwork Winik, Parade Magazine)

Check out the third paragraph, ‘and the missile to damage this building’. It is the third sentence located from the bottom. He admitted the Pentagon wasn’t hit by a plane, but by a missile.

(Unverified) Leaked video of missile hitting the Pentagon:

Slip of the tongue by former 9/11 Commissioner Tim Roemer when he says a ‘missile’ hit the Pentagon, but quickly recovers and says plane:

Retired Army Major General Albert Stubblebine gave an interview stating that no plane hit the Pentagon. In his last assignment, he was head of all the U.S. Army’s Strategic Intelligence Forces around the world. He was “responsible for the signal’s intelligence, photo intelligence, counterintelligence, human intelligence.” He concluded that Flight 77 didn’t crash into, but something did. He found no evidence of wing marks on the Pentagon.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Stubblebine

Did you know that nine out of the nineteen alleged hijackers on 9/11 were found alive? 

“The other two men accused of being terrorists are Salem Al-Hamzi and Ahmed Al-Nami. Mr. Al-Hamzi is 26 and had just returned to work at a petrochemical complex in the industrial eastern city of Yanbou after a holiday in Saudi Arabia when the hijackers struck. He was accused of hijacking the American Airlines Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon.”

And

“Last night the FBI admitted that there was some doubt about the identities of some of the suspects. A spokesman said: “The identification process has been complicated by the fact that many Arabic family names are similar. It is also possible that the hijackers used false identities.”

“The spokesman declined to say whether the FBI would apologize’ but added: “If we have made mistakes then obviously that would be regrettable, but this is a big and complicated investigation.”

Revealed: the men with stolen identities

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/saudiarabia/1341391/Revealed-the-men-with-stolen-identities.html

Hijack ‘suspects’ alive and well

http://http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm

Hijack ‘suspect’ alive in Morocco

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/middle_east/1558669.stm

“We have several hijackers whose identities were those of the names on the manifests,” Mueller said. “We have several others that are still in question. The investigation is ongoing, and I am not certain as to several of the others.”

“Officials refused to say how many hijackers may have used false identities, but officials of the Saudi Arabian government said Thursday that six of the men that the United States has named as hijackers killed in the attacks appear to be living in the Middle East.”

FBI Chief Raises New Doubts Over Hijackers’ Identities

http://articles.latimes.com/2001/sep/21/news/mn-48189

I have now heard from many Americans state that the U.S. wouldn’t lie to the American people. Really? What about the use of torture that our government kept lying to us about?

In February of 2003, the BBC released this story: “US officials have denied allegations of torture after human rights groups called for “urgent intervention” to protect terror suspects detained at an American military base.”

US denies ‘prison torture’ charges

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2760301.stm

“Feinstein went on to drop the biggest bombshell yet, stating, “The CIA spent $40 million dollars to prevent us from issuing this report. That is fact. We did not spend the money, we used our staff to do this report.”

She then accused the CIA of foul play, explaining, “They went into our computers, literally, to take out information, not once, not twice, but three times. I believe that this is a separation of powers violation”.

EXCLUSIVE: CIA Spent $40 million, Hacked Senate Computers to Suppress Torture 

http://21stcenturywire.com/2014/12/09/exclusive-cia-spent-40-million-hacked-senate-computers-to-suppress-torture-report/

“The damning report into CIA torture has led Poland to finally admit that it DID host a secret American prison – after years of denying it. It’s the first acknowledgement by a foreign country to hosting such a site.”

 

Tell the Truth About CIA Torture

http://http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/voices/tell-truth-about-cia-torture

Senate Report on Torture Won’t Use Word “Torture”

http://benswann.com/senate-report-on-torture-wont-use-word-torture/

Here is the Senate’s 500-page report on Bush-era torture

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/12/here-is-the-senates-500-page-report-on-bush-era-torture/

 

As you may be well aware of, 9/11 was referred to as the ‘New Pear Harbor’. “In September 2000, the PNAC published a controversial 90-page report entitled Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century.”

“Rebuilding America’s Defenses” – A Summary

Blueprint of the PNAC Plan for U.S. Global Hegemony

Some people have compared it to Hitler’s publication of Mein Kampf, which was ignored until after the war was over.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3249.htm

“Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.”

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/pdf/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

Do you see the correlation? Did you know that Pearl Harbor was allowed to happen? Yes, you heard that correctly. The U.S. Navy cracked the Japanese code weeks before. Americans before Pearl Harbor had no interest getting involved in the war, so the bankers needed a catalyst; Pearl Harbor.

Please read the following article by Mr. James Perloff, “PEARL HARBOR: ROOSEVELT’S 9/11”, which can be found here:

http://jamesperloff.com/2014/11/06/pearl-harbor-roosevelts-911/

Mr. James Perloff was a guest on Dr. Kevin Barrett’s “No Lies Radio” broadcast, which was excellent and very informative. 

http://noliesradio.org/archives/92461

Douglas Dietrick is an Internationally recognized renegade military historian and global crisis analyst and former U.S. Marine. He appeared on CoasttoCoastam with George Noorey, ‘Pearl Harbor Attack & Open Lines,’ on December 07, 2012. Mr. Dietrick discussed the truth about what occurred during Pearl Harbor.

http://www.coasttocoastam.com/shows/2012/12/07

Douglas Dietrick’s official website: http://www.douglasdietrich.com/bio.html

September 11 — The New Pearl Harbor (FULL)

Dr. Kevin Barrett and Professor Fetzer have their weekly False Flag News where they report the news that mainstream media does not, and goes into detail where MSM doesn’t. Dr. Kevin Barrett and Professor Fetzer cover for the first fifteen minutes the new report about CIA torture. What the report covers and what it left out. They talk about the upcoming new ‘9/11’, where this time it will be an overt display of a nuke going of in. Watch the video to find out which city.

Operations Northwoods:

The U.S. government wrote a series of proposals against the Cuban government back in 1962, which originated from the Department of Defense (DOD) and the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS). The document becomes declassified on November 18, 1997.

“The documents show “the Joint Chiefs of Staff drew up and approved plans for what may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. government,” writes Bamford.

The Joint Chiefs even proposed using the potential death of astronaut John Glenn during the first attempt to put an American into orbit as a false pretext for war with Cuba, the documents show.

Should the rocket explode and kill Glenn, they wrote, “the objective is to provide irrevocable proof … that the fault lies with the Communists et all Cuba [sic].””

U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba:

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662

http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/doc1.pdf

Cognitive dissonance is used to describe the feelings of discomfort that result from holding two conflicting beliefs. When there is a discrepancy between beliefs and behaviors, something must change in order to eliminate or reduce the dissonance.  – http://psychology.about.com/od/cognitivepsychology/f/dissonance.htm

I think it is imperative that you listen to what these psychologists have to say as to why it’s so hard for many of us ‘Americans’ to not being able to come to grips with reality of 9/11. Please have a listen to the video below:

Please go to the 44 minute and 45 second mark:

Coming to Terms from Part 1 A&E911 documentary, “Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out” as Part 1. the Midwest 9/11 Truth Conference: 

I hope and pray that many of those left unaware will wake up to what occurred on 9/11. You will have many government agents come out of the woodwork who have sold their soul to the devil and tell you that this is nothing but a conspiracy theory. They will pull things out of their Asses like there is no tomorrow. Listen to you heart…

 

Captain Russ Wittemburg – U.S. Air force

“The government story they handed us about 9-11 is total bullshi* plain and simple.”

“To expect this alleged airplane to run these maneuvers with a total amateur at the controls is simply ridiculous.”

“With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon.”  — Col. George Nelson (Aircraft accident investigator – U.S. Air force

 

Report abuse
The contributor has disabled comments for this story
Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.