Weaponized Cell Towers, Frequency

Triggered Diseases And Culling !

This rabbit hole runs very deep and the subject matter gets quite technical and a bit Science Fiction”y” at times but it is very real and presently deployed and in use.

It is not my intent to produce a smooth flowing, well thought out article concerning these deployed technologies.  My intent is to present some data dots for YOU to connect and to stir up your curiosity and investigative desires so YOU will begin the quest for truth about these matters for your self.  To truely get a hold of a subject, YOU must invest your time researching the data, only then will you begin to recognize the real value of truth.

Please dig into this subject and bring what you discover forward for the benefit of all who choose to awaken themselves.

Happy data mining.

Knarlydawg

http://www.stopthecrime.net/mind.html

http://stopthecrime.net/source.html

http://ToxicSky.org

http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/nasa-thefutureof-war.pdf

https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/gorenberg_ppt.pdf

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/ElectromagWeapons.pdf

http://deeperweb.com/results.php?q=dna%20is%20an%20antenna&btnG=Search&cx=!004415538554621685521%3Avgwa9iznfuo&cof=FORID%3A11%3BNB%3A1&ie=UTF-8&src=ffnt

A fractal is a pattern that repeats itself on more than one scale, like a square full of squares — or a cloud, coastline or mountain which may be small or large, but has more or less the same shape at any size. DNA is a 6-foot long coiled “ladder” of base pair steps that coils into bigger coils into bigger coils. The fractal pattern of the coiled DNA molecule may cause it to be sensitive to a large number of different frequency bands — whether produced by nature or human technology. This map offers a very basic overview of the topic, with highlighted links to a study and excellent presentation by Dr. Martin Blank. webassets/EMFandDNA090815LG.jpg Electromagnetic fields have been shown in a number of (but not all) studies to damage and/or alter some functions of DNA and RNA. This map is an introduction to information offered by some important researchers in this field. It includes links to audio presentations and articles as well as a large (but not exhaustive) selection of studies.

Electromagnetic fields have been shown in a number of (but not all) studies to damage and/or alter some functions of DNA and RNA. This map is an introduction to information offered by some important researchers in this field. It includes links to audio presentations and articles as well as a large (but not exhaustive) selection of studies.

Epub 2011 Feb 28. DNA is a fractal antenna in electromagnetic fields.

Abstract Send to: Int J Radiat Biol. 2011 Apr;87(4):409-15. doi: 10.3109/09553002.2011.538130.

Blank M1, Goodman R. Author information 1Department of Physiology, Columbia University, New York 10032, USA. [email protected]

Abstract PURPOSE: To review the responses of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) to electromagnetic fields (EMF) in different frequency ranges, and characterise the properties of DNA as an antenna.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined published reports of increased stress protein levels and DNA strand breaks due to EMF interactions, both of which are indicative of DNA damage. We also considered antenna properties such as electronic conduction within DNA and its compact structure in the nucleus.

RESULTS: EMF interactions with DNA are similar over a range of non-ionising frequencies, i.e., extremely low frequency (ELF) and radio frequency (RF) ranges. There are similar effects in the ionising range, but the reactions are more complex.

CONCLUSIONS: The wide frequency range of interaction with EMF is the functional characteristic of a fractal antenna, and DNA appears to possess the two structural characteristics of fractal antennas, electronic conduction and self symmetry. These properties contribute to greater reactivity of DNA with EMF in the environment, and the DNA damage could account for increases in cancer epidemiology, as well as variations in the rate of chemical evolution in early geologic history. Comment in Comments on DNA as a fractal antenna.

[Int J Radiat Biol. 2011] PMID: 21457072 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

http://www.oscillatorium.com/id22.html

Bacteria on the Radio: DNA Could Act as Antenna

Theoretical physicists have proposed an explanation for how bacteria might transmit electromagnetic signals: Chromosomes could act like antennae, with electrons traveling gene circuits to produce species-specific wavelengths. It’s just a hypothesis, and the notion that bacteria can generate radio waves is controversial. But according to Northeastern University physicist Allan Widom, calculations based on the properties of DNA and electrons square with what’s been measured.

“For a long time, there have been signals in water. Something is happening around a kilohertz,” said Widom, lead author of a paper posted April 15 on the preprint website arXiv.

“You have to look for natural energy levels in the system that would give you a kilohertz frequency. With the lengths of DNA and the mass of the electron, you get the right frequency range for these signals.”

Click to Open Overlay Gallery Frequency analyses of recordings made from purified water (above) and water enriched with E. coli (below). Image courtesy Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences The original report of bacterial radio transmissions was made by French virologist Luc Montagnier, who in 2009 described how inductor coils wrapped around flasks of bacteria-enriched water and hooked to an amplifier detected signals in the 1-kilohertz range.

Montagnier’s findings were greeted with considerable skepticism. Though his work linking HIV and AIDS had earned Montagnier a Nobel Prize, his observations of bacterial radio waves — on their own a novel, never-before-seen finding — were followed by even-more-radical descriptions of signals causing loose pieces of DNA to assemble into bacterialike structures. He also speculated about related “nanostructures” in water, which he linked to neurodegenerative diseases.

The claims were embraced by homeopaths, and Montagnier himself became involved in a dubiously designed clinical trial of autistic children. Eventually he left France to head a research institute at Jiaotong University in Shanghai, telling Science that he sought to escape the constrictions of intellectually fearful European scientists. “It’s not pseudoscience. It’s not quackery. These are real phenomena which deserve further study,” he said.

‘The bacteria that set up nanowires are, on an evolutionary scale, fairly old. It’s occurred to me that more modern bacteria may use wireless.’

Underneath all the controversy, however, are the original recordings of bacteria-enriched water. Widom considers them sound. The next question, then, is how bacteria produce electromagnetic waves around a 1-kilohertz frequency. In Widom’s arXiv paper, he and other physicists calculate that as electrons flowed through loops of DNA in E. coli and Mycoplasma pirum, the species tested by Montagnier, they should generate wavelengths similar to what was recorded.

“Different species have different lengths of DNA” in their chromosomes, he said. “These lengths probably determine frequency.”

Widom noted that electromagnetic radio transmissions were not in principle so different from electron transmission between bacteria connected by nanowires. Such bacteria have been described in recent years. Their nanowire-enabled transmissions may allow networked microbes to communicate.

“This could be a wireless version,” said Widom. “Bacteria that set up nanowires are, on an evolutionary scale, fairly old. It’s occurred to me that more modern bacteria may use wireless.”

Widom is especially curious about whether cells in higher life forms might also use electromagnetic signaling, perhaps in coordinating DNA code with protein-making cellular machinery. But as a theoretical physicist, he doesn’t plan to investigate the phenomenon himself. That’s for other researchers to do, Widom said.

“We’re just saying that this gets you to the right frequencies,” he said. “We’re right at the very beginning.”

Hat tip to Technology Review.

Update 4/27: Commenter beebeeo rightly points out that bacterial nanowire communication is not so conclusively described as the article made it sound. Rather than saying “nanowire-enabled transmissions allow networked microbes to communicate,” I should have said they may do so. The qualifier has now been added.

Top photo: E. coli (Center for Molecular Biology of Inflammation)

See Also:

Op-Ed: Microbes May Be More Networked Than You Are

Deep-Sea Bacteria Form Avatar-Style Electrochemical Networks

Microbe May Answer Mystery of Multicellular Life

There’s No Such Thing as a ‘Simple’ Organism

Citation: “Electromagnetic Signals from Bacterial DNA.” By A. Widom, J. Swain, Y. N. Srivastava, S. Sivasubramanian. arXiv, April 15, 2011.