An important Notice to Jacob Rothschild by Anna Von Reitz

————SOMETHING TO PONDER (An article from OperationDisclosure, link below)————–

“Judge” Anna von Reitz vs Tyron Parsons

Submitted by Tyron Parsons | 1:33 PM ET on July 27, 2016

As many on my list are well aware, Anna and I have gone round and round on practically every issue of importance under the sun.

I first became aware of Anna by reading some articles of hers posted by David Robertson at his Maine Email Alert site a little over a year ago. David is a very thoughtful and kind soul. He’s a man of courage and intellect. He has also been in the battle to free us Americans for a long time; most of his expertise in matters of money and the ‘Federal Reserve”, so upon reading Anna’s writings and being exposed to her many claims, naturally my interest was peaked.

From the outset something didn’t seem right about Anna. Some of her claims were obviously tainted by a political bias (can’t necessarily hold that against people) so I kept an open mind and continued reading. After a short period of time things she said really began to bother me especially when SHE JUSTIFIED HER POSITIONS FROM A TYPICALLY JEWISH, MARXIST PERSPECTIVE. Thus began my “correspondence” with Anna.

In the beginning it was cordial. The topics discussed and debated were done so with an eye toward establishing the truth, but in a short period of time points obviously gained by myself gave way to a tidal wave of slanderous attacks by her. Not just the run of the mill attacks. Demonizing slanders over literally hundreds of emails such as I was an evil hater, a white supremacist, a bigot, a misogynist, a Nazi and every other low blow one could imagine. At first I ignored them and stuck to the issues. After all, I was dealing with a female and I don’t make a habit of throwing the same name calling (truth or not) at women as I might respond to a man. But after a while it became very clear that many of the issues she claimed to have the truth about were not truth at all, but rather political and religious opinions contradicted by the very sources she spoke for as if having exclusive authority over. And thus, as time went on and her slanders against my race, my gender, my person became increased, I too become increased. I became totally hardened and resolved to use every tactic she felt she was at liberty to use against me to expose this person for the sake of all whom believe her.

Call me what you want but I certainly feel the old “equality” principal when debating those who claim all is equal but then decided that it’s not fair when another “equal” uses their same tactics.

I could go into what you all know. I COULD BRING UP HER CLAIMING TO NOT BE A JEWESS and then a white women AND THEN A JEWESS AGAIN. I could go on and on about the mountains of perfectly contradicting statements and positions she’s held which she finds absolutely problem with in the least. I could bring up HER ENDLESS WHITE PEOPLE HATING, man hating hypocrisy but all who’ve read these emails are well aware of those things. So allow me to get to the root of the root of the issue in contention because upon this issue rests the truth of the rest; whether Anna is a con-women, a false opposition agent, a fraud, or if she is simply a women living in Alaska fighting the good fight to protect the American people.

Anna has a list of articles at her site. She’s taken on her nay sayers and always claims (without ever citing anything, including from where she derives her authority) that they are all wrong, she is 100% correct, they have no proof to dispute her, especially when it comes to those who claim she isn’t a Judge under our common law. She seems to have addressed many of other people’s points of contention but funny enough, she NEVER addresses my points of fact exposing her for not being who she claims to be.

Here is the challenge to which if she refuses, she’s effectively telling everyone I am right and she’s a fraud.

I challenge Anna to write an article,with specific citations posted to her site that addresses my charge that she is not a judge under our common law for the following reasons.

1. The law of the land in America is Anglo-Saxon, Common, Natural, Christian (NT) law.
2. Our law is inherently Patriarchal and specifically used to Govern our ethnic, racial peoples- whites/European Americans who are the founding, reigning stock of America and all of her lawful Governments.
3.Women are not to hold positions of public authority over men according to our Christian NT law and this is backed by the law of nature as well as our common law traditions (until the advent of the US Corporation 1871).
4. No women has ever held a position of judge under our law from the time of the advent of the Apostles and early Christian Church (Not RCC) – from America’s founding, up to the advent of the legal fiction code system that she says she opposes.

So here’s your chance Anna to set the record straight. Post an article addressing IN SPECIFICS those 4 points refuting with citations why I am wrong and you are right and then allow me to rebut your points to be printed on your article for everyone to see and decide for themselves.

What do you say? You want to redeem yourself in many peoples eyes or shall I hold to my position of dusting off my feet from the first time I ever spoke with you?

Kind regards, Ty

Link: http://operationdisclosure.blogspot.com/2016/07/judge-anna-von-reitz-vs-tyron-parsons.html