Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Roy Potter 1-17-18… “Missiles, Mad Scientists, and Mad Politicians” (Excellent summary video of what’s going on including the Hawaii/Japan missile alerts!)

Thursday, January 18, 2018 5:50
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Headline: Bitcoin & Blockchain Searches Exceed Trump! Blockchain Stocks Are Next!

 

This I just listened to (and yes, it currently is 2:22 AM when I finished) and I found it, how shall I say, an “Excellent summary video of what’s going on including the Hawaii/Japan missile alerts!” (where did I see that line?). One piece of data put together with another piece of data with another. Particularly about the Hawaii (and Japan) missile issue. He covers Hawaii at both the 4:00 and 27:50+ time frames.

He also presents credible data that would explain why Bill Clinton (and Hillary?) and Huma Abedin and others of their type were, all at the same time, apparently, vacationing in Hawaii at the same time Bill was here (1/12 – 1/15) that the Hawaii missile alert came through (on 1-13). To me, those events were connected, and especially when I found this Big Island Now article, saying Bill was on the Big Island, and this HighImpactFlix video, entitled, “Proof MSM Knew IN ADVANCE About Hawaii Terror Drill“. Hey, the main stream media was here… already.

Roy Potter goes on to describe indications that Hillary, even during the debates, was ready and planning to launch a first (nuclear) strike if she were in the President position. After watching this video, I would ask any HRC supporters if they still would rather see her in the US President position, rather than someone who does appear to be standing up to the deep state.
.

https://youtu.be/qttIYzqmNr8

Published on Jan 17, 2018
Link to Q Posts (not an 8Chan link):
https://t.co/DgKRliuWOC

 

 



Source: https://kauilapele.wordpress.com/2018/01/18/roy-potter-1-17-18-missiles-mad-scientists-and-mad-politicians-excellent-summary-video-of-whats-going-on-including-the-hawaii-japan-missile-alerts/

We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 6 comments
  • Pink Slime

    Jabbering, but no proof. Video too long. Cut it off about half way. :lol:

  • Wynter Moon

    He rants that Q has been compromised and yet uses intel from Q. Is that rational or logical? He also talks about a DEFCON 1 Missile strike on Hawaii and Japan…..wait, what….that means we really were at DEFCON 1 and that makes Q correct to use that term. The Potter Suppositor owes Q, B and HIS commander in chief aka The President an apology. A stable military person would not have made it about them by throwing a temper tantrum, they would have been quiet and observed…..not rant and rave about it in a video to get attention. Then when proven wrong doesn’t have the balls to admit he was wrong and apologize. He’s not a Colonel.

    • RAINSCRYPT

      I think you’re absolutely correct to question the veracity/validity of Potter’s assessments. However, I will also maintain this:

      Trust No One. Question everything. Never underestimate anyone.

      Question everything, especially Q posts. They scream for analysis and what they reveal is an inherent equivocation throughout, e.g. you refer to the DEFCON 1 Q posts..
      The bulk of those occurred Jan 7. What does DEFCON 1 [NON NUCLEAR] actually mean? DEFCON 1 as being Defense readiness Condition 1: Nuclear War IMMINENT.. MAXIMUM READINESS.. PRIMED. (non nuclear?) what??

      DEFCON must mean something else in this context. Q even states SPECIFICALLY on Jan. 8:

      23580
      DEFCON does not refer to Defense r Condition w/ regards to prev post.
      Thought clear.
      Now crystal clear.
      Q

      SO.. WTF is Q referring to? What we know for sure is that it is NOT “Defense readiness Condition”. Consider this: https://defcon.org
      Not necessarily as a direct meaning but in terms of what it represents.. cyber hacking. gaming.. infiltration.. going dark.

      DEFCON 1 resurfaces in a Q post AFTER the fact, Jan 13 2018 22:09:38
      Q
      !UW.yye1fxo

      This has the appearance of attempting to connect all of the DEFCON references to the “false alarm” attack message.. but as pointed out, THAT can’t be, according to Q.

      Equivocation is typical of Q posts. Be mindful of that FACT.

      equivocation: noun
      1.
      the use of equivocal or ambiguous expressions, especially in order to mislead or hedge; prevarication.
      2.
      an equivocal, ambiguous expression; equivoque:
      The speech was marked by elaborate equivocations.
      3.
      Logic. a fallacy caused by the double meaning of a word.

  • Counter Analysis

    I doubt the “false” missile alerts were actually false-flag attacks thwarted. Here are the reasons:

    Any deep-state assets responsible for firing the missiles would have been acutely aware of American capabilities to intercept the attack, followed by the wrath that would fall on them for their treason.

    No one would believe NK would initiate a missile or nuke attack without a simultaneous or near simultaneous all-out attack in every other theater. A missile attack from NK is a kamikaze move, and they would have to follow it up with everything they have.

    The average American citizen is easy enough to deceive, but the whole world would know the truth. Russia, China, and non-participatory elements of the US could easily ascertain where the launch came from and who was responsible. Civil war could ensue with China and Russia aiding the US faction that fights against those responsible for trying to initiate WWIII against them.

    Even if there is proof missiles were shot down, an alternate explanation is that it was a live drill, and that the missiles had no warheads.

    A more effective false-flag would be to actually kill some Americans and allies in the vicinity of NK and make it look like NK reacted to them encroaching too close. This would lead to an American response starting an escalating tit for tat that would ultimately lead to NK’s demise.

    • Wynter Moon

      That’s an interesting analysis.

    • raisnbran

      one of the more intelligent observations

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.