I'm a "Luciferian" "Jesuit" "Shill" and Didn't Even Know It!

I don’t like to involve myself in personal internet drama. But apparently this is a direction this guy wants to go. And I think this is instructive because I’m seeing this pattern of people throwing the word “shill” around without any substantial evidence to back the claim. I don’t know what his real name is but the name of his YouTube channel is Harvey Dent’s Re-return.

He has three videos I wanna take a quick look at: “Make note: the story they won’t touch.” “Meet the ShillBillies.” And “The YouTube Shillbillies: RFB and HighImpactVlogs are shills.” These two thumbnails my girlfriend and I got a kick out of because Harvey took the time to superimpose my face on Jed Clampants body and Richie’s face on the body of Jethro from the Beverly Hillbillies. Gotta admit…this is pretty stinking funny. While all the videos have the comment section enabled, for some reason hHarvey’s chosen to disable the like and dislike buttons.

Harvey calls me and Richie from Boston Shills.

The definition of a shill is simple and straightforward. A shill is a plant or a stooge. It’s a person who publicly helps or gives credibility to a person or organization without disclosing that they have a close relationship with that person or organization. In Harvey Dent’s accusation he’s basically saying that I’m a shill who is being paid by some person or organization to either disseminate false information or withhold true information.

What he says in the first video: (clip)

So, the initial basis for his claim centers around Harvey and HIS stories. (clip)

And this is true. In the video he’s referring to, he highlighted 4 YouTubers. 3 he just flat out called shills with absolutely no basis for it other than they sell stuff on their channels and just take Harvey’s word for it. Me he left up in the air but hinted that I might possibly be a shill. (clip)

So, based on what Harvey’s saying here is…every time he sends me an email…every time he leaves a comment, I’m expected sift through literally thousands of comments and emails a day, find HIS comments and emails and when I come across HIS communications with me, I should drop everything I’m doing and address what HE says in a video, or I’m a shill. Seems unreasonable, impractical, self-centered and it seems like a standard he wouldn’t want placed on himself….no one would. Let’s continue… (clip)

Well…I didn’t see it and I do get many comments. And I did find a couple emails he sent (clip)

Here’s what one of those emails said:

“What’s up Brian?

The way I see it, you and I are probably the closest thing that YouTube has to unbiased, truth-seeking reporting. (YouTube has a huge number of content creators. There’s no way I could possibly say that and expect to be accurate.)

Despite my channel being deleted (it was anticipated, they never let channels come back from 2 strikes down) I haven’t for a minute stopped doing what I do; digging, searching and finding the truth and compiling it in what I hope is a very clear delivery

While I interject sometimes a little too much sarcasm/humor into it, I never stray from the topic at hand and can usually make my point in about 3 minutes while presenting some very convincing/compelling reasoning or proof

Your method of delivery is very similar. Very clear, factual, proof-backed and sincere. (This email is from November 11^thguys. But now, all of a sudden, I’m a shill because I don’t respond to and make a video dealing with information he claims to have found?)

I think we should try to team up for a tag team report on ALL the holes in the Borderline Shooting. Talk about our discoveries/findings, etc

I definitely think our styles would compliment one another.

Let me know if you would like to explore that.

If you are, great. If not, no problem.

I just like shaking things up and delivering something DIFFERENT that I know will get attention.

We could get that attention”

He emailed again on the 12^thsaying…

“Just making sure you saw this prior to assuming you’re not interested and moving on.
While I could understand not being interested, I probably wouldn’t understand nonresponse considering the past week’s occurrences.
Hit me back;
I would hate to have to explore the reasoning behind you’re not sharing the OBVIOUSLY QUESTIONABLE relationship between the club owner, his memberships to the rotary and chamber of commerce and the two universities that students supposedly died from being big financial supporters of the chamber.
That is definitely news I would expect to be shared by you.”

I emailed back with “Sorry, just saw this man. I don’t check my emails often. I receive many and it’s just impossible to keep up. Sure, I’d be interested. Maybe we can chat on discord… Here’s my server invite to ya: https://discord.gg/tAhurpZ

Two days later he puts this video out (clip)

Do you see what Harvey’s saying here? If I report on his story…I’m a “REAL TRUTHER”… If I don’t report on his story, I’m not reporting the REAL NEWS” and If I don’t report on it after he presented it to me…then I’ve dropped the ball. This is actually quite self-centered. Report on my news…real truther. Don’t report on it…ball dropper and shill. (clip)

He ends his accusations of me in this video with (clip) What exactly are we talking not of here? Why even mention it? What does subscriber increase have to do with anything? (he finishes out this video trying to hold Richie from Boston to the same self-centered standard.)

Here’s the next video entitled, “Meet the Shillbillies” Here’s his intro. (clip) Then he says, (clip)

Now remember…so far, Harvey putting someone “on blast” simply means condemning anyone for not covering Harvey’s story. And if they don’t cover Harvey’s story, they are not truthers, they are shills. (clip)

Harvey’s narcissism here is cranked up to about an 11. He is stating his assumption as fact that the reason I stopped reporting about Borderline is because I’m keeping up with his content and didn’t want his videos to catch air with YouTube algorithm. Can you even get any more full of yourself? Can you imagine going through life making assumptions and jumping to conclusions like this and stating them as fact? (clip)

Speaking of jumping to conclusions…check this out (clip)

Harvey is suggesting here, that I’m a Luciferian and Jesuit because of my YouTube channel logo. If there was such a thing as text book delusion…this is it.

Basically, Harvey’s saying F you Brian…you’re a shill because you won’t report on my story.

On the third video Harvey talks about a coincidence between me and Richie referring our audiences over to Mike Morales channel because he revealed what looks to be imagery that shows an explosion that initiated the fire that devastated paradise California. And yes, this is a coincidence. I don’t communicate with Richie. It’s possible he saw my video and did a video of his own. Regardless, in Harvey’s mind, it’s sacrilege to say you don’t believe the lies of NASA and yet recognize that there is an observable technological infrastructure that allows us to view things on the ground from whatever is taking this imagery…satellites, towers…what ever. Doesn’t matter to me where the imagery comes from the point is we have the imagery.

So that’s Harvey Dent’s shill accusation of me. Leave your thoughts about this for the world, the google thought police and Harvey Dent in the comment section below.