Planet X Nibiru Update Italian Earthquake 2016

THE mysterious Planet X is approaching and will cause widespread destruction across Earth. One can argue that there is certainly evidence of Planet X’s effects upon Earth, causing it to wobble, which in turn causes high seismic and volcanic activity, as well as extreme weather. “The Planet X effect is setting the Earth up for a coming pole shift.”

Nibiru​, planet X is stated that is already visible from different observatories in the world. Barnard1 is the last name given in honor of its discoverer, an astronomer named Barnard , of which little is known.

Apparently, the planet Hercólobus is a giant with about six times the size of Jupiter, belonging to Tylo, or Tyler system, and whose orbit around the sun takes about 35,000 years.

Hercólobus orbit reaches a point to stand at about 600 million kilometers from Earth, or maybe even slightly less. The danger of collision theory is null because the planetary orbits do not quite cross.

But what consequences may result in the approach to Earth from a planet of such colossal dimensions?

Apparently, the consequences would certainly quite disastrous. four approaches intervals prior to 35,000 years, some of them linked to major extinctions or climate change are assumed.

It is said that was the cause of the extinction of the dinosaurs and even in his last approach shifted the Earth’s axis to its current state and reversed its direction of rotation.

It is claimed that the revolution of the axis of the earth will accelerate and what are poles will become Ecuador and vice versa.

The magnetism of this invader planet awaken dormant volcanoes and draw fire from the center of the earth, causing volcanoes erupting from entering and causing earthquakes chain. In theory, when Hercólobus reach as proximity to our planet, will re-straighten the planetary axis, or divert even more, and will reverse the direction of Earth’s rotation.

Anyway, to put this in its proper terms, the only astronomical document has, with respect to the existence of Hercólobus, is a report sent by the Chilean astronomer Carlos Muñoz Ferrada to Brian Marsden of the Smithsonian Center. Nibiru, to the Babylonians, was a celestial body associated with the god Marduk. 

Nibiru means “crossing place” or “place of transition.” In many Babylonian texts it is identified with the planet Jupiter, but on the tablet 5 of the Enuma Elish is associated with Polestar, also known as Thuban or possibly Kochab.

Nibiru would be a planet proposed by Zecharia Sitchin , based on the idea that ancient civilizations have gained their knowledge and hypothetical development through contacts with extraterrestrials.

However, this description is considered unlikely by scientists and historians.

According to Sitchin, the planet would have acquired the name of the Babylonian god Marduk as a result of usurpation of power by this god in 2024. C., attributing the creation of the Earth by counterfeiting copies of the epic poem Enuma Elish.

Enuma Elish is a Babylonian poem that tells the origin of the world.

Enuma Elish means “when at the top” in Akkadian and represents the first two words of the poem. It is contained in some tablets found in the ruins of the library of Ashurbanipal (669 BC -.. 627 BC) at Nineveh. Each of the tablets contains between 115 and 170 lines of cuneiform dating back to the year 1200. C.

The poem is constituted in verses of two lines, and the second function is to emphasize the first by opposition, for example:

“When on high the heaven had not been named, he had not been called with a name down the land”.

According to this cosmogony, before heaven and earth they had name (not to have name equivalent to not exist), the goddess of salt water Tiamat and the god of fresh water Apsu, fathered a family of gods with the mixture of their water, and these in turn to other gods.

These new Gods disturbed Apsu, who decided to destroy them . Although one of them Ea, to the wishes of Apsu anticipated, doing a spell and spilling the dream about it, then kill him. Ea or Nudimmud, the god parricide, with Damkina begat Marduk, the god of Babylon . At the time, Tiamat is convinced to take revenge and rebel, she decides to give much power to Kingu, her new husband, and hands him the Tablets of Destiny.

Marduk is named by the Gods to face Tiamat, go with the condition of being named “prince of gods or supreme god” finally defeats and kills Tiamat. they are then seized the destination tables Kingu.

Marduk, exultant, plans to make great works and communicates Ea:

I knead the blood and cause you to have bones. I’ll create a wild creature, ‘man’ is called. You will have to be at the service of the gods, for them to live without care.

Kingu is condemned to die for being the leader of the rebellion, and with his blood, Ea creates humanity.

In honor to Marduk the Esagila was built in the Etemenanki. The poem is the story of the eternal struggle between Order and Chaos, since it shows the prototype of the warrior who fights against Chaos, despite not getting never defeat him, so the fight is constant.

Therefore, Marduk, god of light and order, must beat Tiamat, who represents darkness and chaos.

Many of the Sumerian texts dealing with the arrival of the planet omens were prophesying the effect that the event would have on the Earth and humanity.

R. Campbell Thompson ( “Reports of the Magicians and Astronomers of Nineveh and Babylon”) reproduced several of these texts, which describe the progress of the planet as “skirted the position of Jupiter” and reached the crossing point, Nibiru:

“If, from the position of Jupiter, the planet passes to the west, there will be a time to dwell in safety. The friendly peace will descend upon the earth.

If, from the position of Jupiter, the planet increases in brightness and the Zodiac Cancer becomes Nibiru, Acad overflow of fullness, the king of Akkad will grow powerful.

If Nibiru culminates dwell safely land, hostile kings will be at peace, the gods will receive the prayers and supplications attend. “

However, it was expected to approach the planet would cause rain and flooding due to the strong gravitational effects:

“When Planet of the Throne of Heaven grow in brightness, will be floods and rains When Nibiru reaches its perigee, the gods give you peace. Problems will be solved, complications will be clarified rains and flooding will come.”.

As described by Sitchin on the Sumerian cosmology, Nibiru would be sought “Twelfth Planet” or Planet X, which includes the description of 10 planets, plus the Sun and the Moon.

Also it indicates that in ancient times would have a catastrophic collision of one of its satellites with Tiamat, a hypothetical planet also postulated by Sitchin, and that would have been between Mars and Jupiter; a fact which would have formed the planet Earth and the asteroid belt.

Moreover, according to Sitchin, Nibiru would have been home to a powerful alien race, the Anunnaki .

As a result of the collision, according to Sitchin, Nibiru planet would have been trapped in the solar system, returning to the scene of the collision periodically in an eccentric orbit. Later the Anunnaki came to Earth.

Sitchin cites some sources that according to him, talk on the planet, it would possibly be a star (specifically a brown dwarf) would be in a highly elliptical orbit around the Sun, which had its perihelion about 3600 years ago and an orbital period of about 3600-3760 years.

Sitchin attributes these data the astronomers of the Mayan civilization.

In a recently published book, entitled “2012: appointment with Marduk , ” the writer and Turkish investigator Burak Eldem presents a new hypothesis, suggesting that they are 3661 years that would last the orbital period of the supposed planet and claiming that there will be “a return date “for 2012.

According to the theory of Eldem, 3661 it is a seventh of 25,627, which is the total cycle 5-year “global” according to the Mayan calendar spread. The last orbital passage of Marduk, adds, happened in 1649 a. C. and caused great catastrophes on Earth, including the eruption of Thera island in the Mediterranean Sea.

However, there is some discrepancy in relation to the eruption of Thera, which was estimated in 1627 to. C., nor with the Mesopotamian mythology that would have seen five centuries earlier. And even easily visible has been the century of his return.

According to the followers of Sitchin, his ideas would be supported by their dominance in dead languages ​​like Sumerian, and assisted by the translation of parts considered treasures; although this really is not scientifically an astronomical foundation.

Marshall Masters , supports the hypothesis of the existence of the planet Nibiru in our solar system. However, the scientific community (at least officially) denies the existence of a planet, and has made ​​numerous statements in this regard. 

For astronomers,

“Persistent claims about a close but invisible planet are simply absurd”.

From the scientific forums are alerted on a strategy to confuse and feed the myth of the existence of this planet, consisting relate the fictional planet Nibiru with any comments about Planet X or Eris dwarf planet.

In 1930, Clyde Tombaugh found Pluto the planet, after a systematic search initiated by the Lowell Observatory as a result of Lowell’s predictions about the existence of an additional planet in our solar system.

However, it was found that the mass of Pluto was tiny, and once analyzed the orbit of Charon, Pluto’s moon, it was found that the mass of the system was too small to affect the orbit of Neptune.

For this reason the search for Planet X continued. 

In 1983 came the launch of the satellite IRAS infrared telescope. Based on observations of the satellite, statements were published, and later in 1984 also a scientific paper in the journal Astrophysical Journal Letters titled “Unidentified point sources in the minisurvey IRAS ” ( “point sources not identified in the mini - survey of IRAS ‘ ), in which several infrared sources detected of unknown origin were discussed.

This article caused a stir, and the resurgence of all kinds of hoaxes and conspiracy theories.

However, later it was discovered that these “mystery objects” were found to be distant galaxies. In 2008, a Japanese team announced that according to his calculations, there should be an undiscovered at a distance of about 100 AU with a size of up to two thirds of the planet Earth.

The astronomical unit (AU) is the average distance between Earth and the Sun: about 150 million kilometers. These calculations support the hypothesis of the existence of a planet X, but nothing suggests that its orbit may be different from the other objects in the Kuiper belt. In 1951 the American astronomer of Dutch origin, Gerard Kuiper , who is considered the father of modern planetary astronomy, postulated that there must be a kind of proto-comets disk in the plane of the solar system, which should start past the orbit of Neptune roughly 30 to 100 astronomical units. 

This belt would come short period comets.

Since 1992, with the discovery of 1992 QB1 and many others who have followed him, truly the existence of a large population of small icy bodies located beyond Neptune’s orbit had. Although the values ​​of the estimates are quite variable, it is estimated that there are at least 70,000 “trans-Neptunian” bodies between 30 and 50 astronomical units, with over 100 km diameters.

Beyond 50 AU there may be more bodies of this kind, but in any case are beyond the scope of current detection techniques. The observations also show that are confined within a few degrees above or below the plane of the ecliptic.

These objects are known as KBOs (Kuiper Belt Objects).

The study Kuiper belt is very interesting since the objects it contains are very primitive remnants of the early stages of creation of the solar system.

The denser central region condensed to form the giant planets, as the compositions of Uranus and Neptune are almost identical to that of comets. In the less dense region, creating progressed slowly, despite which a large number of small bodies were formed. It is widely accepted that the Kuiper belt is the source of short - period comets, just as the Oort cloud it is for the long term.

After the discovery of 1992 QB1, the study of TNO has become a field of astronomy of very rapid evolution, with great advances in the theoretical field in recent years.

The number of objects discovered is increasing and gradually are obtained new knowledge about its meaning and physical characteristics.

The major disadvantages are that these objects are quite to the limit of current technology to study them . Moreover, only they have been explored very small regions of the sky, so it is likely that we still many surprises in store. In late 1999 there were about two hundred objects known transplutonium provisional designation. They appear to be small icy bodies similar to Pluto and Triton, but smaller. Color measurements show that are usually reddish.

It is estimated that are very numerous and it is possible to find the bodies Pluto-sized or even larger. It has been much talk that Kuiper belt objects are composed of primordial material from which the planets formed, and it would be of high interest to analyze fragments of comets.

However, according to S. Alan Stern , to a scale of 4,600 million years, estimated age of the solar system, the number of collisions must have destroyed all bodies in the belt with sizes less than 35 km.

Consequently, the comets from the Kuiper belt can not have more than 500 million years. They would be collisions and subsequent fragments would be highly modified by the same heat of these collisions, which would be those eyectarían material into the inner solar system, constituting the basis of short-period comets.

The orbits of comets show a wide range of sizes, inclinations and eccentricities.

In the past it was divided comets into two groups based on their orbital period: the long-period comets, with periods greater than 200 years, and short-period comets, with shorter times. The long-period comets have two remarkable peculiarities. The first is that their orbits are mostly concentrated in very large sizes. The second is that its appearance in the region of the planets is isotropic, that is, there is no preferential direction.

In addition, 50% of long-period comets are retrograde, which is consistent with their distribution is random.

It was a fairly general belief that comets came from interstellar space or orbiting the stars at a very great distance from them, and that gravitational perturbations could cause even some could be captured by neighboring stars.

However, in 1950 the Dutch astronomer Jan Oort noted that was not observed any comet to indicate that it came from interstellar space. Also, comets which swept in the solar system, should be disturbed by the planets, especially Jupiter, finding that they were higher than the peak of long - period comets.

This meant that many entered the solar system for the first time, otherwise their orbits and have been modified by the gravitational perturbations of the major planets.

On the other hand, the orbits of long - period comets had a marked tendency for its aphelion, or farthest points in the orbit of a comet or planet around the Sun, were housed at the 50,000 UA. Comets did not come from any preferential direction. From these facts Jan Oort proposed that comets come from a wide external cloud in the far reaches of the solar system. This cloud, over time, was called Oort cloud.

Statistically it is estimated that there may be a trillion comets, although it is pure speculation, and no one has observed that cloud and, much less, the objects it may contain. The Oort Cloud may have a significant fraction of the mass of the solar system, perhaps greater than that of Jupiter, but is mere speculation.

Is thought to be a balloon that surrounds the solar system and the most accepted hypothesis is that it is made up of debris in the solar system.

In fact, originally the sun was surrounded by a cloud of gas and dust from which many of planetesimals, small masses of rock or ice that combine to form larger bodies, and, by aggregation formed same, the planets.

Some of these planetesimals suffered major orbital changes as a result of their encounters with bodies of large mass (the proto-planets) and thus acquired long almost parabolic orbits and were “stored” in the Oort cloud, at an average distance of a light year where, although weak, the gravitational influence of the sun remains still dominant over that of the nearest stars.
 

Oort also proposed a mechanism capable of continuously send a small fraction of the cloud comets into the inner solar system.

Casual transits of other stars near the Oort cloud can alter the orbits of comets, making it possible, random, can be sent into the solar system. It is estimated that, on average, these stellar disturbances occur once every 100 to 200,000 years. Related to this, we have proposed the existence of “comet showers” to explain the great extinctions of living beings on Earth in geological times.

If with some regularity the solar system suffers such “bombing” would be an added difficulty in determining the age of the surface of planets and satellites by counting meteorite impacts.

A dark point of the theory of the Oort cloud is noted that aphelia of most long-period comets appear to lie to the 50,000 UA.

If the bodies that make up the Oort cloud are those who escaped the solar system, we would expect that they would have spread to very different distances, rather than being confined mostly in a band, about the same distance from the sun. Interestingly, objects which form the Oort cloud seems to have formed closer to the Sun than the Kuiper belt not own. Indeed, the small bodies that formed near the planets may have been thrown outside the solar system because of the gravitational encounters and have been developed several models that explain quite satisfactorily.

Those who were expelled could be the Oort cloud, whereas the most distant of the planets, not suffer such interactions, they remained in the Kuiper belt. Sometimes the brainy astronomers also have fun in their speculations and calculations, trying to find what seems impossible.

The success of the Alvarez relate the extinction of the dinosaurs, 65 million years ago, with the impact of a large meteorite with Earth, he sharpened wit of many in order to explain other similar occurrences by impacts.

In almost all these hypotheses, a ridiculous and others with possibly greater foundation intervenes Oort cloud.

In 1977 two geologists, AG Fisher and M. Arthur , suggested that extinctions of marine life on Earth took place in regular cycles of approximately 32 million years.

JJ Sepkoski and D. Raup , after a detailed study of five hundred marine families of the last 250 million years, were surprised to see that life seemed to disappear in cycles of about 26 million years.

Sepkoski had spent years collecting a comprehensive set of data extinctions, making a ratio of 3,500 marine families, including 50,000 fossil genera and about 250,000 species, indicating for each family the geological time of appearance and disappearance.

The first known mass extinction was the deadliest since perished 90% of all marine species. It took place at the end of the Permian, about 248 million years ago. Since then, according to these scientists, there has been another 9 extinctions, spaced roughly every 26 million years.

If it was difficult for many to admit the causes of extinction of 65 million years ago, even more amazing was that at regular intervals a celestial body came crashing into the Earth.

What could be the cause? Help is asked astrophysicists and astronomers to answer to the riddle. And these came out very diligently with nothing usual nonchalance and daring. If it had discovered Neptune from the calculation, why it could not also be detected by calculating the causes of mass extinctions?

And from here it began a series of fantastic musings, a race to see who brought the craziest and original hypothesis.

That if supported (in disguise?) More or less numbers. It began speculating on solar activity and the possibility that it might have some incredible highs, with gigantic eruptions every 26 million years. Without leaving the Sun, it was considered then what influence could have the fact that every 33 million years crosses the galactic plane.

Delving deeper into the subject, RB Stothers and RM Rampino speculated that it passes through the galactic plane, the Sun could meet massive clouds of gas that could disturb comets Oort cloud and direct them toward the center of the solar system.

Others disagreed with this assumption , arguing that the effects of such clouds should be equally important in both the galactic plane as when the sun passes above or below. Several experts in the Oort cloud proposed that the cumulative effects of local matter perpendicular to the galactic disk plane, they called tidal records, were much more important than intermittent gravitational effects created to pass nearby stars or giant clouds of dust and gas.

In 1995, J. Matese and P. Whitman of Southwestern Louisiana University and colleagues M. Valtonen Finland and K. Innanen Canada attempted to quantify the effects of tidal discs.

Their numerical models of the dynamics of the Oort cloud suggest that flicker like the sun through the galactic plane, disks tidal modulate the flow of comets Oort cloud by a factor of 4 to 1, with the greatest effect in the midplane of the galaxy (Icarus 116, 255, 1995).

These results give new impetus to the mechanism of the period of 30 million years. The so - called Planet X is a planet beyond Neptune. The “X” refers to unknown, not the Roman numeral 10, since there were only eight known when Planet X start calling a hypothetical planet in the solar system planets.

In popular culture, Planet X became something generic to signal a planet impossible to find in the solar system. Although Pluto was discovered by the search for Planet X, is not Planet X, and since 2006 has ceased to be considered within the category of planet for inclusion in the dwarf planets.

Neither are Ceres, the asteroid belt or Eris, Kuiper Belt.

By the irregularities presented Neptune’s orbit after being discovered (in 1846), astronomers turned to the search for a ninth planet in the solar system. That planet was called Planet X by Percival Lowell , when he began to look for it in 1905. The planet leading to Neptune to such irregularities was discovered in 1930, 14 years after the death of Lowell, the astronomer Clyde Tombaugh at the Lowell Observatory in Arizona (United States).

Tombaugh had followed Lowell methodically. The technique used was to take two photographs of the same region of the sky on two different days. Each show of 50,000 to 400,000 stars.

Despite all these stars, both images would be identical, if the points of light were only stars. If projected on a screen in rapid alternation, no star would move.

But if one of those lights was a planet in the image would move against the starry background during the interval between pictures.
 

And finally they moved. This was noticed by Tombaugh on February 18, 1930. He saw in the constellation Gemini. The smallness of the object deduced that had to move very slowly, and beyond Neptune’s orbit. The discovery of trans-Neptunian object was announced on March 13, 1930, the seventy-fifth birthday of Percival Lowell.

The name chosen for the new planet was Pluto, namesake of the infernal darkness and the dead in Roman mythology God.

However, later calculations showed that Pluto’s mass was not sufficient to explain variations in the orbit of Neptune, so the search is not considered completed. More recently, in 2008 a Japanese team Kobe University published some calculations that suggested the existence of a planet of a size of up to two thirds of the Earth, orbiting about 100 AU.

To date, no evidence has been found of its existence. It has recently circulated in multiple digital forums the rumor that Nibiru, also known as the “Planet X” or “black star” is approaching Earth and even cross the 2011 completely elliptical orbit of our planet.

There is a theory that Nibiru is a kind of hidden planet within our solar system or, in fact, is a dwarf star that accompanies our Sun and passes through the solar system every 3,600 years, leading to massive geological and magnetic disturbances in the fields of the Earth. This cycle is marked from time Nibiru passes the distance between our planet from the sun, a stage that supposedly has already begun and will run until February 29, 2012, after a duration of 163 days. However, the climax begins to take shape from Nibiru elliptical cross the Earth.

Nibiru is a supposed planet whose existence was proposed by Zecharia Sitchin, whose theoretical existence has become enormously popular among ufologists.

According to Sitchin, the existence of Nibiru the deduced after interpreting ancient texts written by the Sumerians, who also confirmed that the human race was visited by extraterrestrial groups that inhabit this planet, which is hidden within our solar system, why it has gone unnoticed to the eyes of science.

The history of Nibiru date from the time of the Sumerians, from whom the term was used to designate a transition point or a crossroads.

Within the mythology of Babylon, Nibiru was the star of Marduk, the deity who ruled the cosmos.

Even, apparently, there are a printed table with cuneiform script alludes to this astral body:

“Nibiru was located in the passage that united earth with heaven for everyone, both above and below, asking Nibiru if they failed to find this passage. Nibiru is the star of Marduk the gods in the sky made it to be visible. Nibiru represents a mark at the transition point. “

But back to the rumors that Nibiru approaches toward our planet, these specify that NASA is currently tracking a “black star” under the name of the comet Leonid Elenin and whose conjunction with Earth and the Sun is expected for the next years.

And the alleged change of the poles on Earth actually is due to the influence of this brown dwarf star, Nibiru. And confirmed the doomsayers versions around this astrological phenomenon, we could face a series of disturbances that would significantly alter the physical laws around our planet.

Million dollar questions are:

• Could there be in the solar system other planets, undiscovered?

• Is there likely to Planet X?

When the International Astronomical Union voted to demote Pluto to the status of dwarf planet in 2006, they established three criteria to define what is a planet:

• You must orbit the Sun

• its severity should be enough to model it with an almost spherical shape

• It must be massive enough to have a “clean” orbit without remarkable interference

Pluto did not meet the third criterion.

It is considered to be one of many Kuiper Belt objects, icy bodies beyond Neptune’s orbit. Some belt objects travel in extremely elongated orbits around the sun.

Others have irregular orbits.

“These may be signs of disturbance of a distant massive object,” says Robert Jedicke, a scientist at the University of Hawaii.

Of course your opinion has no general consensus.

An early migration of the giant planets could also explain these strange orbits. In recent years, large regions of the sky have been traced in finding objects and more than 1,000 Kuiper Belt objects were found. But these studies of large areas can only detect large and bright objects.

Studies that can find smaller objects cover only small areas of the sky. A Mars-sized object at a distance of, say, 100 AU would be as weak as difficult to observe. This could soon change.

In December 2008, he was the first prototype of Pan-STARRS. Soon, four telescopes equipped with the largest digital cameras in the world will look in the sky everything that moves. Its main purpose is to look dangerous for the Earth asteroids.

But the bodies of the outer solar system will not escape their observations.

Robert Jedicke and his team are developing software to automatically detect objects with Pan-STARRS. This new telescope has begun to virtually explore the outer solar system, and is already getting discoveries.

The first telescope Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS) has already discovered 10 bodies in the Kuiper Belt.

According to its brightness, the newly discovered objects ranging in size from 300 to 500 km.

“We are excited that Pan-STARRS is beginning to find these objects,” said astronomer Matthew Holman, the Smithsonian, who heads the Project Pan-STARRS-1 Outer Solar System.

“This is just the tip of the iceberg of the discoveries of Pan-STARRS” he added.

The discovery of a distant planet would be an extraordinary event.

His presence could be explained by the merger of large objects and their subsequent expulsion by the gravity of giant planets. Could Planet X brown dwarf? It’s hard to believe this possibility. A brown dwarf is less than a star and larger than a planet. These objects whose mass is less than that required to sustain the fusion.

These hot objects are born, as are formed, like stars, a cloud of gas and dust. The process generates so much heat that even a brown dwarf may have fusion in its core. At least for a time. But they can not maintain that merger and off.

A brown dwarf shines infrared mature. It has a temperature of between 1000 and 2500 degrees Celsius, so sheds very little visible light.

Gliese 229b is an example of brown dwarf. He eluded detection until 1995. It shines with a magnitude 25 in visible light. Gliese 229b is located 18 light years away. An X planet that was similar to this brown dwarf, but is found in our solar system, would be much brighter, with a magnitude 2. It is said that Planet X is in an orbit that brings it close to the Sun every 3600 years ( like Sumerian traditions regarding Nibiru). With knowledge of the laws of gravity it is possible to calculate its distance at any given time.
 

Known astronomer Phil Plait work of calculations was taken: In May 2002, the supposed planet X would have been in a similar Earth and Saturn that is as bright as the gas giant distance. The forecast that happen close to Earth in 2003, obviously not fulfilled.

Is it possible that there is any planet in the solar system that has not yet been discovered? If possible.

A small body beyond Neptune, it is difficult to observe. An object beyond Pluto, for example, if small, could have escaped detection. Why then there ruled the planet X?

Claims on the planet X arise from the book “ The 12th Planet ” by Zecharia Sitchin.

The author claims to have studied the Sumerian tablets. Taking their stories of gods and other myths as facts, determined that they were in contact with an alien civilization living in a 12th planet (the current eight planets, plus Pluto, the Sun and Moon) in our solar system, passing through the inner solar system every 3600 years.

The myth of Planet X includes the “shift” and “Stop the rotation of the Earth.” From the book it has been increasing the number of followers who believe that indeed it is a reality. One objection is that if a planet 23 times larger than Earth and passed through the inner solar system every 3600 years, it is assumed that we would have already detected.

The Nemesis hypothesis arose in a research article published in 1984,

• RA Muller (physicist at the University of California, Berkeley)

• Piet Hut (physicist at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton)

• Mark Davis (Princeton),

… In the journal Nature in 1984.

Nemesis would, according to this article, a more distant than Pluto’s dark and small star, perhaps a brown dwarf with an orbit tens, hundreds or even thousands of times.

Nemesis hypothesis is an astronomical hypothesis that sustains the possibility that our sun is part of a binary system. In this system, the companion star of the Sun, as yet undiscovered, Némesis be called by the catastrophic effects that would produce the periodically disturb the Oort Cloud.

In Greek mythology, Nemesis (called Ramnusia, the ‘goddess of Ramnonte’ in the sanctuary of the city) is the goddess of retributive justice, revenge and fortune. He punished those who did not obey those who had the right to send them and, above all, their parents disobedient children.

Received the vote and secret oaths of love and avenging the unhappy lovers or unhappy for perjury or infidelity of her lover. According to this hypothesis, our Sun, as 50% of the systems of stars in the galaxy, form part of a binary system. Its other focus would be off (or dead) star, a brown dwarf or a small black hole. The alleged object, called Nemesis by researchers, would orbit between 1 and 3 years light of your partner.
 

 

Every 26 to 34 million years, Nemesis would close or enter the Oort cloud, destabilizing it and throwing showers of large comets toward the sun, which would explain the apparent frequency of the big impacts and associated extinctions, confirmed by registration fossil and geological layers of iridium, an alien metal. There are also some magnetometric measurements and other evidence that would favor this assumption.

However, the fact of a gravitational field associated with the star calls into question this hypothesis has been recorded. Muller has been claimed in an interview that “if you give a million dollars, discovers Nemesis”.

In 1985, Whitmire and Matese of the University of South Louisiana, suggested that Nemesis could be a small black hole.
 

 

In October 1999, the British astronomer John Murray announced it had discovered a ninth planet while studying a comet in the margins of the Solar System.

 

Due to its characteristics would be comparable to Nemesis, According to Murray, the new planet or star would revolve around the sun at a 1,000 times farther away than Pluto, although such theoretical discovery eventually could not be verified.

 

In early 2000, a team of US astronomers He calculated that the dark star, if any, could be a brown dwarf, coinciding with the statements of John Matese, of the University of Louisiana, who that same year studied the orbits of eighty-two comets of the Oort cloud, saying their orbits had some strange elements in common that could only be explained by the gravitational influence of an object several times the size of Jupiter.

According to their hypothesis, the new planet would be 30,000 times farther from the Sun than the Earth, and would orbit the Sun in the opposite direction to the other members of the solar system sense. Murray calculated an orbit that would be completed in about six million years and he estimated its distance from the Sun in nearly five billion kilometers.
 

However, neither his theses have been demonstrated. Still not enough material evidence of the existence of Nemesis has, therefore, remains more a hypothetical solar system object.

 

D. Whitmire MARESE and perfected his studies of disturbances on the Oort Cloud (The Astrophysical Journal Letters – 1996). Their analysis of a group of cometary orbits indicate that the galaxy play a role in these disturbances.

 

However, P. Weissman of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory indicates that these effects appear only when one takes into account a small group of comets, what Matese responds that can only be taken into account those comets whose orbits have been well determined. According Matese, although comets would only account for 25% of terrestrial impact craters, they are proportionally produce the largest craters, more than 100 km in diameter, which are causing extinctions.
 

 

Meanwhile, RA Muller and M. Davis proposed a hypothesis spectacular worthy of the best science fiction novels:

the sun could be a double star, with a remote partner that could disrupt the asteroid belt every 26 million years and directing a hail of them into the inner planets of the solar system.

But the hypothesis was mathematically inconsistent because the orbit of the star supposedly would be unstable.

 

Davis made contact with P. Muller Hut, a specialist in orbital dynamics. This changed the orbit of the alleged companion of the Sun and placed much further, so that the “deadly projectiles” that we would not launch asteroids, comets but Oort Cloud. But so it could be feasible and based on a suggestion by JG Hills, they had to put the densest part of that cloud at a distance between 1,000 and 10,000 AU, when normally admits that it is much higher.

 

However, with the numbers in hand, every 500 million years, and over a period of 700,000 years, the rain of comets would be so intense that to achieve full to Earth become a real sieve, so it was likely that life would long ago have disappeared from our planet, if it ever was able to create …

 

Yet in 1984 they unveiled their hypothesis suggesting that his death star, if it was discovered, bear the name of Nemesis, Greek goddess whose task was relentlessly pursue the rich, proud and powerful, adding if the star was not discovered, it would be its own nemesis. EM Shoemaker , a specialist in asteroids, showed the impossibility of the hypothesis, which was not obvice so that in 1984 the search for Nemesis, a red dwarf star is started currently it should be at 2.5 light years from us.
 

At that time also they entered the fray D. Whitmire and Matese JJ suggesting that the star’s death could be the undiscovered planet X, which should orbit the Sun in about 1,000 years and that, as should disturb the outer planets, also it should be affected by them, so that would cause the rotation of the line of apses of its elliptical orbit, perturbing the Oort cloud every 26 million years.

 

This hypothesis was discarded in 1989 when the Voyager 2 probe showed that the alleged disturbance on the giant planets by an outer body does not exist, but were due to miscalculations.

 

Nevertheless, there Nemesis?

 

Occasionally, every 15 or 20 years out in the media the news of the discovery of some transplutoniano planet, which is later disproved or nuanced. The latter is news from the BBC dated September 28, 1999, indicating that Dr.John Murray may have found a planet from disturbances observed in a group of 13 comets, diverted from their orbits by a massive body .
 

 

It would be a planet, or maybe a little star several times as massive as Jupiter and located 30,000 AU, ie, during the Oort cloud or the inside.

At the moment it would be in the direction of the constellation of the Dolphin and complete its orbit, retrograde, in several million years.

Delphinus (the Dolphin) is a small constellation in the northern hemisphere near the celestial Ecuador. It was already included in the list of Ptolemy 48 constellations and also forms part of the modern list of 88 constellations approved by the IAU. Delphinus has the look of a dolphin jumping and can be easily recognized in heaven. It is surrounded by Vulpecula (the Fox) Sagitta (arrow), the eagle (Aquila), the zodiacal constellation of Aquarius, the little horse Equuleus and finally by Pegasus, the winged horse.

Another way to recognize it is by having a shape similar to that of a comet and because it is small. The particular rotational direction opposite to that of the other planets, indicate that it is an object wandering captured, or perhaps step , by solar gravity and would have formed elsewhere in the galaxy, possibly escaped from a star.

The work of Dr. Murray was sent to Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and presented in the DPS of the ASA (American Astronomical Society) in October 1999. Such a body, except for example that radiate a significant amount in the infrared, it is impossible to detect with optical telescopes because at that distance the sunlight is insufficient to illuminate the surface.

Meanwhile, the indefatigable John J. Matese also said it had reached similar conclusions and sent to publish their study in the journal Icarus. The news should be taken with due reservations to have more details of the find.

So, Brian Marsden , of the Minor Planet Center , has been skeptical, indicating that the alleged orbits of comets used in this study are imprecise, since they are based on few observations from them.

But maybe, despite everything, Nemesis exists.
 

 

 

Some astronomers found evidence of similar objects planets around star orbiting pairs together -called binarias- stars. In one of them, 8D + 20 307 system, researchers at the University of California at Los Angeles, the University of Tennessee and Caltech, all in the United States, the existence of planets detected with regular orbits.

 

It is known that at least 50% of the stars in the universe are binary, while solitary, as apparently is the sun, are a minority. There are even systems that have up to six stars together, however, have several not guarantee that the planet orbiting might harbor life.

 

For this to happen scientists estimate that the habitable zone would be an area where the temperature variations of the surface of the planet to oscillate between 0 and 100 ° C, range in which water can be found in the liquid state, condition supposedly essential for life.

 

In binary systems there are two possible scenarios for a planet: to exist and, given the case, have water and life. In the first assumption; the two stars are very close to each other, such as 8D + 20 307 binary system, while on the other the stars are distant.

 

This is the case of Alpha Centauri, which has three stars: High Centauri A, B and C.

 

But the latter is so small and so far from the first that does not affect the whole. As are the closest star to us and have a similar size to the Sun, have been quite studied by scientists, so far only they found a planet. Before understanding binary systems, it is necessary to know how ours works.

 

In this solar system’s habitable zone varies from 0.95 to 1.37 AU, which is the distance between Earth and the Sun, about 150 million kilometers. Earth is the only planet in this area. The gravitational attraction of the sun’s mass exerts on our planet, almost causing small strokes in the orbit- 0.0001 UA. Andy Lloyd wrote a book entitled “Dark Star – The Planet X Evidence”.
 

 

According to him, there are certain doubts regarding the various incongruities and often intractable problems of the planet Nibiru, from which the “gods” aliens called Annunaki, as is explained in the works of Zecharia Sitchin.

 

A planet that behaves like a comet does not seem possible to sustain life forms similar, if not identical, to us. Unless life is kept inside the planet.

 

In principle, we believe that the only way to generate enough heat for life as we know it would be that there was a planet orbiting a brown dwarf star that, in turn, was in solar orbit. It could also be that the brown dwarf Nibiru was the same, that crossed the solar planetary system during perihelion with his own retinue of planets.

 

But it’s a risky statement, given the size that requires a brown dwarf . In 1963 astrophysicist of Indian origin Shiv Kumar was the first to theoretically study the evolution and properties of stars of very low mass which were known at that time. Their calculations would correspond to what is now called brown dwarfs. Kumar called these objects black dwarfs. 
 

 

The name Brown Dwarf was proposed in 1975 by the astrophysics Jill Tarter , famous for being the spokesman for the SETI project, acronym for Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence , or Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence.There is disagreement about the use of brown dwarf or brown dwarf names worldwide, although Spanish has been imposed mostly brown dwarf.

 

The first verified brown dwarf was Teide 1, 1995, in the IAC-80 telescope of the Observatorio del Teide (Tenerife island) by a Spanish group of astrophysicists belonging to IAC. The brown dwarf Gliese 229B is best characterized, the companion of smaller mass Gliese 229. Star have size yellow dwarf. However, it seems quite likely that the brown dwarf there. And possibly the binary star in solar orbit that approaches solar planetary zone every several thousand years.
 

 

But now also is possible that this brown dwarf is not Nibiru, but simply the central star of the planetary system of Nibiru.

 

Accordingly, the theory of Zecharia Sitchin, we would add a system with a brown dwarf. This would provide the necessary living conditions if we refer to a planet or satellite in a near brown dwarf orbit. However, neither the brown dwarf Nibiru are not visible to the naked eye from Earth.

 

Apparently, its closest approach occurs near Pluto, in the so-called Kuiper Belt, beyond Neptune. The planet Nibiru see is the outermost of the brown dwarf system. And apart from that apparently does not have the conditions to support life, Nibiru is essentially as described by Sitchin, a reddish planet that shines with a similar to comets aura while moving among the planets of the solar system.

 

However, Nibiru is also linked to the brown dwarf and does not seem to orbit the Sun when viewed from Earth.
 

 

 

This is part of the problem exposed by the Nibiru Sitchin. It was certainly the first objection put Dr. John Murray, English astronomer author of a document that provides indirect evidence of a brown dwarf in solar orbit.

 

He noted the constellations through which passes Nibiru during perihelion and established that the sidereal body does not orbited the Sun, and therefore Sitchin’s theory would not be correct. This implied that perhaps Sichtin theory was a wrong interpretation of ancient texts. However, this anomaly really part of the theory, which, after all, the strange orbit Sitchin was correct.

 

The solution proposed by Andy Lloyd covers a number of other problems. In fact, everything seems to fit beautifully. Nibiru enters the solar planetary system moving backwards in the sky, with a retrograde motion.

 

If we observe the planetary system to Neptune and Pluto, the center of the diagram would be the binary Dark Star, which moves around the sun in a large ellipse that takes thousands of years. It has reached perihelion, the closest point to the sun. However, it is still at a distance twice as Neptune.

 

This distance corresponds to the Kuiper belt, an area of comets beyond Neptune. Thus, the Dark Star would be about 70-80 AU from the Sun at perihelion. Still too far away to be seen from Earth. In Astronomy direct motion or prograde motion can be defined in different ways: Rotational motion of a star counterclockwise as viewed from above the solar north pole; movement of a body in its orbit, also counterclockwise as viewed from above the solar north pole; west to east movement of a star on the celestial sphere, seen facing south.
 

 

Such is the monthly movement of the moon, from the Northern Hemisphere. Rises in the east in growing phase, and about two weeks later looks in the West in its full phase, describing a counterclockwise motion from said hemisphere.

 

retrograde motion is the opposite direct. Such is the diurnal motion of the sun, from East to West is, clockwise, also from the Northern Hemisphere.

 

We can define it as:

A body rotating clockwise as viewed from above the solar north pole; the movement of a body in its orbit, clockwise as seen from above the solar north pole, the movement from east to west of a star on the celestial sphere, seen facing south.

 

 

 

Of the planets in the solar system only two have retrograde rotation: Venus and Uranus.

 

The axial tilt of the bodies with retrograde motion is greater than 90 degrees. Thus 177,36º Venus is tilted on its orbit, and Uranus 97,86º. The direct and retrograde motion are defined considering a certain position of the observer (from above the solar north pole), and for a certain sense of visual (facing south).

 

Therefore a movement be direct or retrograde independent observer.

 

Another thing is to be appreciated for it clockwise or counterclockwise. Thus, the orbital motion of the Moon is straightforward in both the Northern Hemisphere and the Southern Hemisphere, but it will be counterclockwise, and in this schedule. Similarly, the diurnal motion of the Sun -retrógrado-, will schedule an observer North and South counterclockwise to another.

 

Direct or retrograde say they are the true sense of movement, while clockwise or counterclockwise is circumstantial, depending on the position. In 2004, sponsored by NASA researchers have discovered the most distant object in the orbit of the sun.

 

It is a mysterious planet-type body, which is three times farther from Earth than Pluto.

“The Sun appears so small from that distance that could completely block it out with the head of a pin,” says Dr. Mike Brown of the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in Pasadena, California, professor of planetary astronomy and leader the research team.

The object, called Sedna (or Xena) in honor of the Inuit goddess of the ocean, the Eskimo mythology, is 13 billion kilometers away, on the edge of the solar system.

 

This is probably the first observation of the Oort Cloud, a distant place where there are small icy bodies, and that causes comets that streak by Earth. Other notable features of Sedna include its size and reddish color. After Mars, it is the second reddest object in the solar system.

 

An estimated Sedna is approximately three-quarters the size of Pluto. Sedna is undoubtedly the largest object found in the solar system since the discovery of Pluto in 1930.
 

 

 

Dark Star orbits the sun like as does the rest of the way planets; forward.

 

Apparently it has always orbited the sun. The orbit normal direction is in harmony with the discovery of Sedna, which also has an orbital movement forward. This would imply that a relationship exists between the orbits of Sedna and the Dark Star , probably orbital resonance.

 

In fact, the movement of a brown dwarf through the Kuiper belt to the perihelion, would explain many of the apparent anomalies. According to myth, there are 7 planets in the system binary Dark Star.

 

Andy Lloyd suggests that one of the inner planets similar to Earth and livable. Its temperature is warm due to its proximity to the brown dwarf, illuminated by its very subdued reddish light. The planets orbit the Dark Star moving forward, according to the initial formation of the binary system 4,600 million years ago.

 

Dark Star orbiting in a considerably shorter time employee to return to the solar perihelion. Even the outermost planet, crossing the space of the outer solar planets, moves faster than the Dark Star. The result is that although the Dark Star and its outermost planet move actually moving forward from the point of view of an observer on Earth to outer planet is seen in retrograde move across the sky. 
 

 

This clarifies a problem of long standing. This outer planet is Nibiru. It can be seen from Earth as a planetary comet. I think unlikely to be close enough to reach the inner planetary system; It would be disturbed by the sun’s gravity.But it would be visible even from beyond Jupiter by the appearance of some volatile ice surface; It would be like a great comet even such a large Sun distance.

 

Perihelion distance would vary in each different past for its location in its own orbit around the Dark Star (so here my opinion is necessarily ‘ball-park’).

 

Sometimes there would be a perfect juxtaposition between its own perihelion and the Dark Star, in a line with the sun. Other times will be on the opposite side of the binary Dark Star during perihelion. So the return of Nibiru necessarily vary and its celestial position and relative brightness. Perhaps this is the reason why we know so little about the transitory appearance of your body. Another important detail is the fact that Nibiru is not spinning around the sun. It seems to come toward the sun and suddenly quickly back without crossing a large portion from the sky. This explains the strange group of constellations through (which probably varies transit traffic) plus short period during which you can see Nibiru.
 

 

Although the Dark Star will take hundreds of years to cross the perihelion, the time during which Nibiru would be visible from Earth would be short; perhaps weeks or months.

 

There may be even more of a visible transit during perihelion binary star. Anyway, this scenario opens up a lot of new possibilities. The idea that a planet of the Dark Star is our ‘Planet X’ imply that Nibiru would orbit about 60 AU from the Dark Star (and this may also vary if its orbit is elliptical around the binary paternal).

 

But it was discovered a recent precedent in the form of a large planet, displayed a similar distance from a brown dwarf known to astronomers as ’1207′. The Hubble image shows the planet (in pink) near the parent star (center) .So it is not difficult to extrapolate a similar situation for our binary Dark Star, with Nibiru as the accompanying planet.
 

 

 

 

 

This finding has on me thinking. It comes with the potential of a solution of 3 bodies for orbital configuration. Further. We know that out of a Planet X know that there are essentially 3 Notable bodies; Dark Star and two major planets in orbit (the remaining 5 appear as minor bodies).

 

The two notables are Nibiru at ~ 60 AUs away and the home planet much closer to the Dark Star itself.

 

And these added to the 9 known planets of the solar system bodies lead to 12 planets, which seems closer to the Sumerian scenario of 12 planets posed by Sitchin himself!

 

 

 

 

This image shows the solar system according to my stage with the Dark Star: (left to right)

• Sun

• Mercury

• Venus

• the earth

• Mars

• Jupiter

• Saturn

• Uranus

• Neptune

• Pluto

• binary Dark Star

• the home planet, Nibiru

 

 

Other aspects of the myth about Nibiru become more understandable with this hypothesis.

 

In his classic book “ Hamlet’s Mill ”, Giorgio de Santillana and Hertha von Dechen explored the mysterious nature of Nibiru in 1969 and showed that, at that time, no academic theory adequately explained its celestial nature.

 

It has not changed much since, except of course, for Sitchin’s books.

 

Here’s what Santillana and von Dechen have to say about what the name Nibiru really means:

“The plain meaning of ‘Nibiru’ is the ferry, the ferryman (Charon, the ferryman), ford – is the price one has to pay to cross the river -. From eberu to ‘the crossroads’”

The “Planet of the Crossing” is then a freighter species.

 

This made ​​little sense until now because it would imply that Nibiru carries passengers from one place to another. This point was never clarified by Sitchin, who insists that Nibiru was the home planet of the Anunnaki .

 

However, with our new perspective, within the meaning of the name “ferry” is clarified as much as a glass.

 

The passage of the Dark Star around the Sun at perihelion is still a very distant event. The closest, the Dark Star is still twice that Pluto distance. To meet the Dark Star a trip would take many years in space, with the risk of losing such a remote object to observe. Then Nibiru acts as an intermediary. It is immersed in the planetary zone of the solar system and then returns to the cometary cloud. It can serve as a stone space travelers ideal base to Dark Star. Literally it acts as a ferry.
 

 

There are also other symbolic overtones in this.

 

If the Anunnaki are personal gods, then their Homeworld is the mythological heaven. It is quite similar to the Earth ( ‘be done on earth as in heaven’, ‘as above, so below’, etc). The myth of Ferryman coming to pick up the dead to lead the World Submerged could acquire new meaning in light of this new hypothesis.

 

Another jarring point Sitchin model is the fact that Nibiru is said moves across the sky at an angle of 30 degrees to the ecliptic, almost twice the inclination of Pluto. However, a regular-sized planetary body moving through the solar system with an extreme to the plane of the other planets, eventually angle would cause chaos in their orbits.

 

This is called the Kozai effect , which has become a big headache for me in recent years.

 

Again, this new hypothesis allows us to circumvent this problem, since the Dark Star does not move within the planetary zone of the solar system at all.

 

However, Nibiru, its outer planet does, and Sitchin seems reasonably clear about its tilt angle according to the texts that have been studied.
 

 

 

It seems that both the inner planets of binary stars (the Sun and the Dark Star) should remain as they were created; relatively at the same angle of the plane of the original protoplanetary disk.

 

Billions of years of interaction between the peripheries of this pair of separate systems, have yet generated chaos and perturbamiento among some of the outer planets. In the case of the Sun, Pluto is clearly perturbed, like many of the newly discovered bodies beyond it.

 

It also appears that Nibiru is similarly affected, along with any of cometary own entourage Dark Star in your space.

 

This means that the visible sky arc Nibiru well be seen with relatively abrupt passing inclination, in reflection of this angle to the ecliptic. However, the Dark Star can be moved along a path consistent with the other solar planets.The end result of this is that we can predict very little about the location of the Dark Star from Nibiru transits observed. However, this is what I’ve always felt viscerally. 
 

 

I tend to think that the Dark Star lies near the ecliptic, and even I favor the area around the Sagittarius as your current location (near aphelion). This is because the “line of sight” perihelion is the Duat region around Sirius and Orion. Sagittarius is opposed to this region in the ecliptic. But this is just my opinion. Others disagree.

 

If my hypothesis here is correct, then all efforts to deduce the position of the binary companion of the Sun and its own system of planets will collide with failure.

 

There are simply many complicated factors at play. This new hypothesis is exciting and elegant. Of course I mean a complete re-write, but that is the nature of progress.

 

This is an evolving study, might as well say the science itself.
 

 

 

Hercólubus (more correctly Hercobulus) is a fictional planet created in the second half of the twentieth century possibly by the medium and Brazilian lawyer Hercilio Maes (1913-1993).

 

Several astrologers have predicted that Hercobulus will be closer to Earth and would be the cause of the end of the world since 11 August 1999. After the failure of the prophecy in 1999, the distant planet has reappeared course taking advantage of the next end of the world Mayan day solstice December 2012.

 

Hercobulus would find in a course called Tilo solar system, it would be approaching the Earth.

 

Colombian writer VM Rabolú , author of “Hercolubus” allegedly quoted astronomical data considered relevant to take into account the alleged threat of Tilo.

 

These data would be its size, 6 times larger than Jupiter and the action of its huge gravitational field would be the producer of a major catastrophe. He states that Hercobulus is about 500 AU from Earth and when approaching to 4 AU from Earth, generate a catastrophe. Besides mentioned that the planet and observe in 1999 as a big star at dawn. According Rabolú Hercobulus would have passed through the Earth about 13,000 years ago, destroying the ancient civilization of Atlantis. ”Hercolubus or red planet”, has aroused curiosity in many followers of the philosophies belonging to the current New Age. However, it seems that no scientific basis.
 

 

Rabolú follower of the Gnostic doctrine preached by the late Samael , argues that the objective of the approach of course Hercobulus is purification of the terrestrial aura. A giant planet that was approaching Earth, leaving about 600 million km from Earth, would be visible from Earth. A body 6 times larger than Jupiter would be very bright in the night sky.

 

Being a gaseous planet, its atmosphere would think that would probably be composed of hydrogen and helium and have similar characteristics to Jupiter “sixfold”; then its albedo would also be similar to that of Jupiter, and therefore reflect sunlight with similar intensity.

 

Therefore, if Hercobulus was as close as Jupiter (a distance of about 778 million km from the Sun), it shines a nearly 3 times brighter than Venus magnitude.

 

If it were about 10 million km, its apparent size would be monstrous.
 

 

 

Hercolubus is supposed to be a giant planet that belongs to a solar system called Tylo.

 

Hercolubus with its large size and its orbital parameters cause huge catastrophes on Earth. Not that Hercolubus will hit Earth, but his career would take him to the vicinity of Earth’s orbit and will be the action of its huge gravitational field on our world what triggered the destruction of the earth’s crust and this Humanity .

 

Hercolubus will be the apocalypse for us all.

 

It consists of Tylar star around which planets revolve,

• Hercolubus

• Phema

• epsilon

• Hegama

• Tylon

• Lylio

It is a solar system similar to ours and is approaching at high speed toward Earth, so in the near future will cause terrible cataclysms on our planet.

 

It is difficult to get an idea of how this planet that threatens us only reading a text. However, it is stated that more than 30 years ago that astronomers know the existence of this planet and solar system of Tylo. When it looks at firstglance we can not do anything. Hercolubus terribly affect the earth ‘s crust. It is known to exist in the same cracking caused by various natural causes. 
 

 

It has a length of about 90,000 km., With an average width of 40 km. And an average depth of 2.5 km., And extends across the earth’s surface but these cracks are more common in the Pacific Ocean. In some places breaking the crust has already reached the point of putting in direct contact the fiery magma inside the Earth with seawater.

 

The huge amounts of water vapor produced are pressing surface geological layers, causing progressive destabilization, and an increase in earthquakes and volcanic activity.

 

Unfortunately this has already begun to occur. The wave of earthquakes in 1999 was an example of this.
 

 

 

As Hercolubus gets closer to Earth its gigantic gravitational pull will attract the molten magma towards the earth’s surface dramatically increasing the number and intensity of earthquakes, tsunamis, volcanic eruptions, etc., which will reach magnitudes never before seen on this site.

 

At the peak of its proximity the final cataclysm, a true will occur Revelation on: global overturning of the axes of rotation of the Earth.

 

Ecuador will become the poles and the poles in Ecuador and oceans, violently expelled from their beds by these cosmic forces, immerse the entire planet.

 

Hercólubus also alter climate terrestrial favoring the appearance of “El Niño”.

 

This is a periodic warming of Pacific waters that changes all the planet’s climate by producing drought and floods, famine and plagues, fires, epidemics and hurricanes worldwide.

 

The real cause of the warming of the gigantic mass of water from the equatorial Pacific, responsible for these phenomena is the contact of the molten rock inside the Earth with ocean water through the earth cracking said before.

 

The progressive approach of this giant planet will increase this contact between fire and water and, consequently, the thermal imbalance of the global climate with these fatal consequences.

Non Human Entities

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/hercolobus/esp_hercolobus_107.htm