Profile image
By John Ale (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Breaking – Rebublicans Join Nation Wide Blitz to Remove Trump

Saturday, October 8, 2016 16:03
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

David Vose: The Media is now in total panic. DAMNING information was just released against HILLARY and they could not hide it. So they are now in a full scale MEDIA blitz to remove Donald Trump.

They are trying to divert the attention from the revelation that Hillary is working for the corporate leaders and elite bankers. She has sworn her allegiance to the Elite and admitted she is not for the American people. She should be disqualified immediately.

But the Media is trying to keep your attention on the worst they have against Trump. A statement he made privately and jokingly about a woman’s private parts 11 years ago.

This will not work friends. The American People is too smart. They will lose. Hillary and her Puppet masters are going down.

Source: David Vose

We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 1 comment
  • desertspeaks

    /watch?v=ETa1NKTAoLc Hillary Clinton Accused Of Raping A 7 Year Old Girl
    /watch?v=Tor00iWUhDQ Hillary Clinton Laughs While Discussing Defense of Child Rapist
    /watch?v=5CKoSbpwncE bill clinton gropes woman while camera’s rolling.. oops!

    a private conversation recorded without two party consent, under california law, “which is where days of our lives if filmed” Cal. Penal Code § 632. The statute applies to “confidential communications” — i.e., conversations in which one of the parties has an objectively reasonable expectation that no one is listening in or overhearing the conversation. See Flanagan v. Flanagan, 41 P.3d 575, 576-77, 578-82 (Cal. 2002). A California appellate court has ruled that this statute applies to the use of hidden video cameras to record conversations as well. See California v. Gibbons, 215 Cal. App. 3d 1204 (Cal Ct. App. 1989).

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global


Top Alternative




Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.