Linda Moulton Howes explosive discovery of leaked information concerning extraterrestrials, time travel and self-activating software and machines. Linda explains these objects also have strange symbols. Under certain frequencies somehow generated by the dark objects, invisibility and gravity manipulation occurred as if the solid objects with no moving parts were also self-activating software.

Howe presents a few ufo cases to illustrate and suggest that Extraterrestrial life is definitively incorporating specific and advanced software programming into their human contact; with things like crop circles, suppressed technology, and even case studies involving binary code transmitted to contactees in a recordable, documentable format. While the possible explanations to this theory are widely varied, there is also empirical speculation that natural algorithms like Pi could be inherent to some of this alien software, which could have some profound implications if correct.

 

---

 

Then I found this debunk of the alien drone material

that is in Linda’s video above.  I also noticed that

there were some similarities between the info in

Linda’s presentation and information being

presented in some videos further on in this posting.

There’s some interesting information here,

especially the sigil info in the last videos of this

article.  I think it will be clear that the crop circles

are actually very elaborate, huge sigils that are

probably more nafarious than benign.

 

 

---

 

The Truth About The Aerial Drone Claims
And ET Reverse Engineered Technology

PART I: June and July 2007
PART II: October and November 2007

© Researched and Written
By
Starfire Tor

PART I – Page 1

I am a firm believer in the existence of extraterrestrial craft and technology, as well as the existence of the intelligence behind those craft and that technology … whether the origins are off world, interdimensional, alternate timeline, or even of ancient or future earth origin. I am also an analytical thinker, and demanding researcher, when it comes to claims of the fantastic. This is because I know that it is possible for the fantastic to be a realistic and essential element that interacts with the structural foundation of planet earth, the human experience, and the multiverse. What seems fantastic may, in fact, provide a vital key to unlocking and understanding even greater hidden, lost, or suppressed core scientific truths.

Therefore, just because someone promotes a UFO and related story – complete with ET reverse engineering claims, photographs, and documents – as the ‘aerial drone’ claims do – doesn’t mean that I am going to automatically accept that story and evidence as truthful. Such a claim should not be automatically accepted or rejected without a sincere and intelligent investigation. There is too much at stake. Either the ‘aerial drone’ claims are genuine, and the UFO community has been given some much needed smoking gun evidence, or another UFO related hoax has infiltrated and corrupted the field of UFOlogy.

When a fantastic UFO and related claim is presented with sincerity, meaning no intended deception is involved – regardless of whether there is physical evidence or only anecdotal testimony – it has the potential to bring the human race closer to solving the core mysteries of planet Earth. But when a claim turns out to be a hoax, that hoax has the potential of contaminating and obscuring the truth about the planet’s core mysteries. It’s hard enough for sincere and well intentioned UFO and related researchers and experiencers to share their information and get respect, whether that respect comes from family and friends, the public, the scientific community, or the news media. Hoaxers and their hoaxes only serve to reinforce why genuine UFO related researchers and experiencers find respect so hard to come by. So in effect, and regardless of why a hoax is foisted upon the public, hoaxers are saboteurs and their hoaxes act to destroy the credibility of the entire field of UFOlogy.

I am also keenly aware that there is a thriving black ops industry, where secret human sourced technology is often mistaken for something not of human origin. The black ops community rarely plans for it’s black ops projects to be witnessed by outsiders, but readily uses the ‘alien/ET’ misidentification as a cover for misdirection away from their black ops projects. This same cover works well, when what is witnessed is actually something genuinely unknown or extraterrestrial that the black ops community has nothing whatsoever to do with … and has no control over.

Such is the game of black ops smoke and mirrors, as many a dedicated and principled UFO investigator has discovered. But this isn’t all that a dedicated and principled UFO investigator has to contend with, as they try to make sense of the maze of smoke and mirrors positioned between them and the truth. Thrown into the mix, as possibly the greatest misdirection of all, are the UFO hoaxes that pollute the field and derail the journey to truth. Although I’m sure that a handful of hoaxes and misdirections stem from the black ops community, most UFO and related hoaxes stem from the minds of people who are not connected to the black ops community. Whatever drives such independent hoaxers, whether it’s some psychological need or some perceived financial pay day, their dishonest games make it even more difficult for legitimate and ethical UFO researchers to search out the truth and gain credibility. The black ops community views such independent corruptive hoaxes as a boon to their own mission to keep their secrets a secret. For the black ops community, independent hoaxes achieve their goals without costing them money or project and personnel exposure. Hoaxes are rampant in the UFO and related community, and in some cases, drive the belief systems of many of those interested in the UFO field.

Therefore, when an incredible black ops – reverse engineered – UFO – alien drone claim emerges in the court of public awareness, that claim should be investigated for possible authenticity. It isn’t even so much whether such a claim could be true, because the elements in the ‘aerial drone’ claims don’t even approach being exotic, at least compared to the fantastic yet authentic information that defines the extraordinary and multidimensional world we inhabit. The real challenge is whether this particular series of ‘aerial drone’ claims, with all its intricate parts, is genuine or a hoax. If it’s genuine, then the claims should be supported and further researched to wherever the truth leads. But if it’s a hoax, then those responsible should be exposed, and the fake claims tossed into the trash with every other hoax that has contaminated the field of sincere and beleaguered UFO and related research.

What follows is an abridged edition of my investigation and report, and my findings into whether the 2007 series of ‘aerial drone’ and related claims are genuine or a hoax. The conclusion: The 2007 series of ‘aerial drone’ claims, which include the first series of ‘aerial drone’ photographs followed by ‘Isaac’s’ claims and evidence, are all part of an elaborate and connected hoax. However, there is more value to this investigation’s conclusion than only knowing that a hoax was perpetrated. Just as important, as the conclusion, is gaining an understanding of how and why this hoax was foisted into the public arena, and how the hoax was uncovered.

 

PART I – Page 2

In the Spring of 2007, Whitley Strieber showed me a series of photographs and documents that had his interest, but also had him puzzled. The photographs had been dubbed ‘aerial drones’ or ‘dragonfly drones’, and were making the rounds of the internet and the UFO community. He asked my opinion of the photographs, and the written material that accompanied them. I had many questions about the ‘aerial drone’ evidence and claims, including the disclosure presented by a character calling himself ‘Isaac’.

Here are some if the first ‘aerial drone’ photographs, as presented to the public in 2007. Some photographs, in this report, have been sized for publication purposes.

 

 

Photos of the first series of alleged ‘aerial drones’, as presented to the public in 2007. The top two photos were claimed to have been taken in Big Basin, California. The bottom photo was claimed to have been taken in Capitola, California. Starfire Tor has determined that these ‘aerial drone’ images are digitally manipulated, making the images deceptive.

According to ‘Isaac’, those ‘aerial drones’ – including the photographs and documents he promoted – were the product of a black ops anti-gravity project involving ET [extraterrestrial] technology that was reverse engineered at a place he called the ‘CARAT Laboratories’ in Palo Alto, California. And how did ‘Isaac’ claim to know all of this detailed and classified bombshell of information? According to ‘Isaac’, he was an insider with hands on involvement in the 1980s black ops project, and used his position of trust to steal copies and originals of the top secret material he was now presenting to the public.

Here is what ‘Isaac’ wrote about his self proclaimed ET reverse engineering work, and his theft of classified documents from that project:

“I’d often take upwards of 10-20 pages at once. By the time I was done, I’d made out with hundreds of photocopies, as well as a few originals and a large collection of original photographs.”

I always find it ironic, and ethically troubling, that a person claiming to be in a position of trust – who breaks that trust by supposedly stealing what does not belong to him – now expects the world to trust him with the extraordinary claims he is making. This type of paradox always poses a conundrum for an investigator. This theft scenario, while ethically troubling, does not always mean that the claimant is a liar operating a hoax. There have been whistleblowers, in many jobs throughout history, who have broken the company trust to get important truth to the public. However, an investigator must always keep this trust issue in mind. To ignore its implications, that the claimant and his claims are untrustworthy, only serves to hinder the integrity of the investigation. This trust issue with ‘Isaac’, which my investigation determined was a valid issue, was only one of many red flags attached to ‘Isaac’s’ claims and material.

Based on my first look, at the material he showed me, I told Whitley Strieber that I had never seen those particular ‘aerial drone’ images before, nor had I ever come across the pages of documents I was shown. I advised caution, pending a more in-depth investigation into the source and authenticity of the photographs, the documents, and the people making claims under the umbrella of independent ‘aerial drone’ witnesses and – in the case of ‘Isaac’ – a participant in an ET reverse engineered ‘aerial drone’ and anti-gravity black ops project. I advised that the photographs needed to be scrutinized by a an expert in photo imaging and special effects, including CGI. Once completed, the analysis would determine whether the ‘aerial drone’ photographs had or had not been digitally manipulated.

There were other considerations, in testing the veracity of the first series of 2007 ‘aerial drone’ photographs from California and Nevada, such as whether any of the photographs were created through the use of strategically positioned physical props. In the early days of non digital special effects film and photography, a constructed life size or miniature 3-D prop was often placed into a real scene for a realistic look. Likewise, a real item or person could be placed into a constructed scene, to effect the illusion of authenticity. With the use of green and blue screens, a person or prop can be inserted into various backgrounds and scenes. Likewise, images of real people can be digitally inserted into a 3-D scale model of something, such as “Harry Potter’s” Hogwarts castle or “Star Trek’s” Enterprise spaceship, thereby creating the illusion that real people are in fantasy places. Therefore, even if the ‘aerial drone’ photographs were proven to be free of image manipulation, including tell tale special effects artifacts, I advised Whitley Strieber that this alone did not prove that the ‘aerial drones’ were as claimed. More research was needed.

To better understand the ‘aerial drone’ and ‘anti-gravity’ ET reverse engineering back story, here are links to the initial main web sites supplying photographs, documents, and initial commentary about the ‘aerial drones’. These web sites include ‘Isaac’s’ CARET Q4-86 Research Report and photos, George Noory’s Coast To Coast, Linda Moultan Howe’s Earthfiles, and Whitley and Ann Strieber’s Unknown Country.

http://isaaccaret.fortunecity.com/

http://isaaccaret.fortunecity.com/pacl-q486-photo-1-fullsize.jpg

http://isaaccaret.fortunecity.com/pacl-q486-photo-2-fullsize.jpg

http://isaaccaret.fortunecity.com/pacl-q486-photo-3-fullsize.jpg

http://isaaccaret.fortunecity.com/pacl-q486-photo-4-fullsize.jpg

http://isaaccaret.fortunecity.com/pacl-q486-report-p2-halfsize.jpg

http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=1278&category=Environment

http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=1265&category=Environment

http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=1284&category=Environment

http://www.coasttocoastam.com/gen/page2022.html?theme=light

http://www.unknowncountry.com/journal/?id=288

http://www.unknowncountry.com/journal/?id=291

http://www.unknowncountry.com/diary/?id=295

 

PART I – Page 3

Shortly after Whitley Strieber introduced me to the ‘aerial drone’ mystery, I was approached by a group that wanted me to investigate the authenticity of the ‘aerial drone’ and related claims. I took on the task, and this report is an authorized abridged version of my confidential in depth report on the ‘aerial drone’ and related claims of 2007.  As the investigation progressed, many red flags arose with all of the claims, photographs, and documents presented. ‘Isaac’s’ CARET report, in structure and content, did not pass professional muster. It did not read like an authentic science and technology laboratory internal document, especially one involved in classified and/or cutting edge research and development. It wouldn’t have mattered whether that document was associated with a black ops ET reverse engineered anti-gravity project, or a human sourced R&D project involving cutting edge technology. Had the CARET project been authentic it would have been compartmentalized, and the report would have reflected that. The report is not only lacking in standard compartmentalization, and other standard security features that deter leaks and espionage, the report’s content is composed of superficial and scientifically questionable material. Likewise, ‘Isaac’s’ personal work accountings point to the lack of standard compartmentalization that this supposedly ET reverse engineering project would have had in place. ‘Isaac’s claims, and his CARET report, read like a Science Fiction story. For purposes of promoting a hoax, it was a Science Fiction story intended to fool the public into believing that the story was real.

The first series of ‘aerial drone’ aka ‘dragonfly drone’ photographs made their public debut in the Spring of 2007. Alleged witnesses with photographs, who identified themselves as ‘Chad’, ‘Chad’s wife’, ‘Rajaman’, ‘Jenna’, ‘Ty’ and ‘Stephen’, came forward through the use of e-mails and internet sites. The alleged witnesses claimed to have taken their photographs at various times and dates in Bakersfield, California; Big Basin, California; Capitola, California, and Lake Tahoe, Nevada. ‘Isaac’ joined in with his own claims, including photographs that displayed various sized discs and rings and a black cylindrical object he called an ‘anti-gravity generator. These discs and rings, in particular, looked to be design components found in the first series of ‘aerial drone’ photographs, which feature images that combine discs, rings, wires, and spokes.

‘Isaac’s’ self insertion into the ‘aerial drone’ mystery, with his detailed photographs and documents, are what provided a back story and connection between his material and the first series of ‘aerial drone’ photographs. ‘Isaac’ pointed to the odd character symbols, appearing on his ‘ET’ reverse engineered ‘anti-gravity generator’, and noted that these same character symbols also appeared on some of the surfaces of the first series of ‘aerial drone’ images. These shared character symbols presented an important piece of evidence, which would turn out to be significant in exposing the hoax. ‘Isaac’ used this connective character symbol evidence to support his suppositions, including providing proof that those first series of ‘aerial drone’ images were connected to the ET reverse engineered black ops project that he claimed to have worked on in the mid 1980s.

Besides the possibility, that the character symbols might be deciphered and traceable, I knew that they meant something else as well. I knew, that if ‘Isaac’s’ claims turned out to be a hoax – which my investigation confirmed they were – then the character symbols were part of that hoax. Therefore, anything carrying those character symbols would, in high probability, be a hoax as well. As the investigation progressed, the shared character symbols proved to be the evidence that connected all of the ‘aerial drone’ and ‘anti-gravity’ ET reverse engineering claims to the same elaborate hoax.

Investigating the ‘aerial drone’ and ‘anti-gravity’ ET reverse engineering claims included a critical study of the material on ‘Isaac’s’ web site, as well as the reports and photographs of the alleged eyewitnesses to the first series of ‘aerial drone’ photographs. It didn’t take me long to detect, what had the earmarkings of, an elaborate and classic ‘gatekeeper’ scheme. In such a scheme, the gatekeeper – in this case ‘Isaac’ – is the person claiming to possess fantastic information that is known and controlled by him. The other players, in the scheme, are generally the set-up players who pave the way for the ‘gatekeeper’ to make a public entrance. The most convincing hoaxes successfully blend lies with known facts, thereby creating a plausible scenario that lures people into believing that a lie is the truth. It’s an age old formula for deception.

Set-up players, and the ‘gatekeeper’, are sometimes played by the same person. In other hoax scenarios, the set up players and the ‘gatekeeper’ are played by different people working together to shape public perception. In this particular type of ‘gatekeeper’ scheme, the set up players initiated the public buzz about the ‘aerial drones’, while maintaining that they were independent witnesses who had nothing to do with ‘Isaac’ or a hoax. If one person is playing all of the roles, then the goal of the master player would be to quickly fade out all of the set-up players, thereby leaving only the primary ‘gatekeeper’ to advance the scheme. If there is more than one person, playing the roles, then this allows the individual set up people to continue their part to support and advance the scheme.

After studying the material, I took the first series of ‘aerial drone’ photographs, as well as the photographs ‘Isaac’ provided, to computer image rendering experts who work in the film and television special effects industry. The photographs, with their tell tale special effects artifacts, are the easiest and most obvious hoax clues to deduce. All of these experts reported that the first series of ‘aerial drone’ images had been manipulated, and weren’t especially good in their execution. Among the many discernable rendering artifacts the experts cited were: unnatural grain repetition used as area filler, such as the sky area; mottling in the shadows of the aerial objects, where there should be a smooth transition without unnatural modifications; lines and lighting and shadows that appear unnatural, including the relationship between the aerial object and a telephone pole; the unnatural termination fade of the ‘whisk wires’, and the lack of appropriate motion blur on the ‘aerial’ images.

The special effects experts showed me how quickly and easily they could create hoaxed UFO images, similar in execution to the ‘aerial drone’ hoaxed images. They also showed me how they could take the faked ‘aerial drone’ images, do some creative modifications, and insert the ‘aerial drones’ into other scenes that could be either a static photograph or a moving video. In the way of proof of authenticity, it is not relevant if the original ‘aerial drone’ images can be duplicated and hoaxed. Authentic objects can be duplicated and hoaxed. What is relevant, is that the original ‘aerial drone’ photographs themselves are hoaxed.

The imaging experts then reviewed the photographs presented by ‘Isaac’. The cylindrical and curved black objects, which ‘Isaac’ identified as anti-gravity generator devices, were deemed to be photographs of actual 3-D objects. This didn’t prove that these specific objects were what ‘Isaac’ claimed they were, only that the images were based on photographs of actual 3-D objects. ‘Isaac’s’ ring/disc-like objects, which looked like disassembled parts from the first series of ‘aerial drone’ photo images, were deemed to be based on photographs of actual 3-D objects … although they detected many artifacts in the photographs. This meant that those ring/disc-like images had undergone some form of image manipulation.

 

PART I – Page 4

The following photographs show the unusual character symbols, found on some surface parts from the first series of ‘aerial drones’ images, that match the character symbols found on the objects and documents provided by ‘Isaac’. Despite ‘Isaac’s’ claim, that the character symbols originated with ET technology, the character symbols had a familiar look to them. Aspects of the design, of the ‘aerial drone’ and ‘anti-gravity generator’ character symbols, resembled the real alphabets of Japanese Katakana and Aramaic. These real alphabets had inspired the look of the Science Fiction alphabets of “Star Trek” Klingon and “Star Wars” Aurek Besh. Although my investigation determined that the ‘aerial drone’ character symbols did not exactly match any of these real or fictional alphabets, the visual association with Science Fiction alien alphabets sent up a red flag that cast serious doubt on the authenticity of the ‘aerial drone’ and ‘antigravity generator’ character symbols.

Photos of alleged ET reversed engineered ‘anti-gravity generator’ and ‘I-beam’ parts, from ‘Isaac’s’ web site. Starfire Tor identified these objects as having been inspired by, and mainly constructed from, various pipeline pigging parts. Note the character symbols on the many surfaces of the ‘anti-gravity’ generator’ and ‘I-beams’. Starfire Tor found these character symbols to be similar to the alphabets of Japanese Katakana, Aramaic, “Star Trek” Klingon, and “Star Wars” Aurek Besh. Update: Between October and November 2007, the ‘aerial drone’ character symbols appeared as part of a viral marketing scheme for Dell owned Alienware Area 51 MX15 laptops.

Photo of alleged ET reversed engineered ‘discs/rings’ from ‘Isaac’s’ web site. These rings/discs bare a striking likeness to the ring/disc features in the first series of ‘aerial drone’ photos. Starfire Tor determined that these discs/rings were inspired by, and mainly constructed from, various pipeline pigging parts, wheel rims, and various rings and discs.

Photo of character symbols from ‘Isaac’s’ claimed ET reverse engineering documents, supposedly stolen from the ‘CARET Laboratory’ in Palo Alto, California. Note that the character symbols are identical to those found on the first series of ‘aerial drone’ objects. Starfire Tor found these character symbols to be similar to the alphabets of Japanese Katakana, Aramaic, “Star Trek” Klingon, and “Star Wars” Aurek Besh. Update: Between October and November 2007, these same ‘aerial drone’ character symbols appeared as part of a viral marketing scheme for Dell owned Alienware Area 51 MX15 laptops.

Photo of the character symbols, which are from ‘Isaac’s’ web site, and which are identical to character symbols found in ‘Isaac’s’ photographs and in the first series of ‘aerial drone’ photographs. Starfire Tor found these character symbols to be similar to the alphabets of Japanese Katakana, Aramaic, “Star Trek” Klingon, and “Star Wars” Aurek Besh. Update: Between October and November 2007, the ‘aerial drone’ character symbols appeared as part of a viral marketing scheme for Dell owned Alienware Area 51 MX15 laptops.

Photo of a section of the Big Basin, California ‘aerial drone’, supposedly taken by ‘Chad’, showing the character symbols identical to the ones ‘Isaac’ presented as being extraterrestrial in origin and part of an ET reverse engineered technology black ops program. Starfire Tor found these character symbols to be similar to the alphabets of Japanese Katakana, Aramaic, “Star Trek” Klingon, and “Star Wars” Aurek Besh. Update: Between October and November 2007, the ‘aerial drone’ character symbols appeared as part of a viral marketing scheme for Dell owned Alienware Area 51 MX15 laptops.

Actual character symbols of Japanese Katakana alphabet. Researched by Starfire Tor.

Actual character symbols of Aramaic alphabet. Researched by Starfire Tor.

Fictional character symbols of “Star Trek” Klingon alphabet. Researched by Starfire Tor.

Fictional character symbols of “Star Wars” Aurek Besh alphabet. Researched by Starfire Tor.

PART I – Page 5

One thing was certain, someone or some group had put a lot of time and energy into getting the ‘aerial drone’ claims and material into the court of public awareness. Someone or some group had put a lot of time and energy into creating a UFO themed back story, at the very least, to create a worldwide buzz that would ensnare some UFO researchers, promoters, and interested parties. But what was the purpose of such an elaborate hoax? Was its purpose to flood the UFO field with disinformation? If so then why at this time, and what was the disinformation being used to cover up? As a disinformation tool, the hoax seemed pointless. Was yet another person, or team of people, looking to make money promoting a UFO related hoax as real … again? That was possible. Then again, the hoax might be a viral marketing scheme … and there was good reason to keep that possibility on the front burner of possibilities, as my investigation revealed.

In June 2007, at a time when the ‘aerial drone’ story was building buzz, the Halo 3 XBOX computer game series – developed by Bungie Studios and published by Microsoft Game Studios – launched a viral marketing scheme that included fake info and odd web sites. Bungie and Microsoft had engaged in viral marketing for their games before, and other companies elsewhere had also engaged in viral marketing. Viral marketing can bring in huge revenues. Therefore, one of my areas of investigation had to be whether the ‘aerial drone’ material was actually part of a viral marketing ploy for Halo 3, or for some yet unidentified product.

Reading through ‘Isaac’s’ material, it quickly became clear that he put a very heavy emphasis on computer technology. This included ‘Isaac’s’ professed superb computer skills and work history, and how this supposedly lead to his work with the very real XPARC [Xerox Palo Alto Research Center], the very real DoD [Department of Defense], and the hoaxed reverse engineering project at the ‘Isaac’ introduced CARET Laboratories [Center for Applied Research In Educational Technology] and PACL [Palo Alto CARET Laboratory].

‘Isaac’s’ photographs, documents, and claims presented a convoluted tapestry of connections between his claims and the computer industry. Besides his own computer industry based resume, there were other computer related items that caused me to suspect that there was a high probability that the ‘aerial drone’ hoax was connected to a computer related viral marketing scheme.

‘Isaac’ claimed that the ET reverse engineering work took place at the CARET Laboratories. He claimed that ‘CARET’ was an acronym for ‘Commercial Applications Research for Extra-terrestrial Technology’. Interestingly, Bill Gates of Microsoft fame – Microsoft who publishes the XBOX 360 Halo computer games – just happens to have a project called ‘CARET’, with the acronym ‘Center for Applied Research In Educational Technology’. According to the website http://caret.iste.org/ “CARET is a project of the International Society for Technology in Education in partnership with Educational Support Systems. CARET was founded in 2000 with a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation”.

Then there is the ‘caret’ character symbol itself, which ‘Isaac’ has on the cover of his CARET manual. The caret symbol, which is also known as the circumflex, is the symbol “^” above the 6 key on a standard United States qwerty keyboard. The caret symbol has a number of uses, including acting as a sign to insert a letter, word, or paragraph at a particular place in a document. The caret symbol is also used in mathematics to represent a square, cube, or other power. For example, 6^3, which can also be represented as 63 or 6*6*6*. Caret symbols are also used in different computer programming languages.

Photo of the ‘CARET’ PACL Report Cover, as presented by ‘Isaac’. Note the caret character symbol displayed on the cover. Researched by Starfire Tor.

The caret symbol, which is also known as the circumflex, is the symbol “^” above the 6 key on a standard United States qwerty keyboard. Researched by Starfire Tor. [Photo: Keyboard Images]

As in most elaborate hoaxes, ‘Isaac’ mixed authentic information with false information. This is a technique that is generally used by hoaxers and disinformationists, with the intent to trick people into believing their deception. While the gist of his claims are part of an elaborate hoax, there actually is a company in Palo Alto called PARC [Palo Alto Research Center]. Here is some information about the company, straight from their own web site.

http://www.parc.com/

“PARC (Palo Alto Research Center, Inc.). Founded in 1970 as part of Xerox Research and chartered to create the architecture of information, PARC was incorporated in 2002 as an independent research business. PARC has contributed to the creation of more than 30 companies and is celebrated for such innovations as laser printing, distributed computing and Ethernet, the graphical user interface (GUI), object-oriented programming, and ubiquitous computing. PARC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Xerox Corporation.

PARC (Palo Alto Research Center, Inc.) works closely with varied enterprises and new ventures to discover breakthrough business and technology concepts that solve real needs, and transform how enterprises deliver value to customers. PARC takes an agile, multidisciplinary approach to open innovation by bringing together physical, computer, biological, and social scientists who have the vision, expertise, and instinct to convert groundbreaking scientific findings into industrial-strength prototypes.

Incorporated in 2002 as an independent research business, PARC is celebrated for such innovations as laser printing, distributed computing and Ethernet, the graphical user interface (GUI), object-oriented programming, and ubiquitous computing. PARC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Xerox Corporation.”

PART I – Page 6

‘Isaac’ continued his tie in to computers, with his explanation of the character symbols found on the ‘aerial drone’ photographs, and his own presented photographs and documents. He likened the character symbols to a form of software execution. The bulk of his focus was on the function of the character symbols, followed by a focus on an ET reverse engineered anti-gravity device. This was yet one more tie in that had me wondering if the ‘aerial drone’ hoax was a viral marketing campaign for Halo 3, or some other game or product associated with computers.

Here is how ‘Isaac’ describes how the supposed ‘ET’ based character symbols function:“But their technology is different. … They had something akin to a language, that could quite literally execute itself, at least in the presence of a very specific type of field. The language, a term I am still using very loosely, is a system of symbols (which does admittedly very much resemble a written language) along with geometric forms and patterns that fit together to form diagrams that are themselves functional. Once they are drawn, so to speak, on a suitable surface made of a suitable material and in the presence of a certain type of field, they immediately begin performing the desired tasks. … I worked with these symbols more than anything during my time at PACL, and recognized them the moment I saw them in the photos. They appear in a very simple form on Chads craft, but appear in the more complex diagram form on the underside of the Big Basin craft as well. Both are unmistakable, even at the small size of the Big Basin photos. An example of a diagram in the style of the Big Basin craft is included with this in a series of scanned pages from the [mistitled] “Linguistic Analysis Primer”.

While ‘Isaac’s’ described character symbol function may seem authentic and original sounding to some, the system he describes will sound very familiar to fans of the Science Fiction film and television series “Stargate”, “Stargate:SG1″, and Stargate:Atlantis”. What ‘Isaac’ has described is a variant of how the fictional stargate works.

The Science Fiction show’s stargates come in the shape of large rings, which are marked out by nine chevrons spaced equally around the circumference of the ring. There are 39 character symbols displayed on an inner ring on gates in the Milky Way Galaxy, and 36 symbols displayed on the inner ring on the gates in the Pegasus galaxy. The stargates act as artificial wormholes, which act to transport people and objects across vast distances around the cosmos. A main part of the stargate wormhole process is known as ‘dialing’ an address, which connects one stargate wormhole to another. Addresses are dialed up by touching or engaging the correct sequence of character symbols, which in turn relate to constellations and more local destinations. Stargates are created from, and powered by, a special Science Fiction heavy mineral called “Naquahdah”. As each character symbol is dialed, the chevron “engages” or “encodes” as an ordered string.

Here are some photographs of the Science Fiction movie and TV series “Stargate”, “Stargate:SG1″, and Stargate:Atlantis” stargates and dialing platform, with character symbols. After viewing these stargate rings, look at the rings that compose the first series of ‘aerial drones’, and then the similar rings that ‘Isaac’ displays on his web site. As an extra connection to Science Fiction themed rings, the Halo 3 series also incorporates rings as a major part of its story line. ‘Halo’ refers to seven enormous ring worlds that are scattered across the galaxy. When activated, the rings become weapons of mass destruction. Larry Niven’s “Ringworld” book series, from1970, featured enormous space rings. FYI, the “Stargate” movie was not the first Science Fiction project to feature a ring shaped wormhole literally called a stargate which, like the “Stargate” franchise, connected earth to a distant home of ancient “gods”.

For purposes of comparison between the hoax anti-gravity generator rings seen above, as found in the pages of the fake Palo Alto Caret Laboratory Inventory Review, the hoaxer borrows from the popularity of ring shaped devices found in Science Fiction movies, TV series, books, and computer games that feature time travel and wormhole travel through space, time, and dimensions. Also above, similar rings can be seen as part of the design of the hoax aerial drone. Photos of popular Science Fiction ring devices follow below.

 

Photos of the “Stargate:SG1″ stargate rings, and the “Stargate:SG1″ dialing device, with character symbols. Researched by Starfire Tor. [Photos: Stargate]

Photos of the seven activated halo rings, from the XBOX 360 “Halo” computer games. Researched by Starfire Tor. [Photos: Bungie]

Photos of Larry Niven’s first edition book cover for his 1970 “Ringworld” book. Researched by Starfire Tor. [Photo: Amazon]

 

If the ‘aerial drone’ publicity was part of a viral marketing scheme, even if it wasn’t for Halo 3, there is plenty to tie the ‘aerial drone’ claims and material to computers. Based on what ‘Isaac’ wrote, including his claimed history working in the computer industry and then the DoD [Department of Defense] in the United States, the foundation for the ET reverse engineering project he worked on was tied to the strange character symbols. These are the character symbols seen in his photographs, and on the ‘aerial drones’ in the first series of hoaxed photographs. If the ‘aerial drone’ and ‘anti-gravity’ material was connected to a viral marketing ploy, then this connection would become clear in time.

PART I – Page 7

Part of the fun, of watching the earlier Science Fiction TV shows, was to figure out what ordinary objects were repurposed as Science Fiction props. In those days production budgets were tight. To compensate for the shortage of production funds, creative prop builders took ordinary objects and turned them into futuristic and alien looking gizmos and gadgets. Whether it was a tricorder on Star Trek”, a device that controlled a giant seaweed creature on “Voyage To The Bottom Of The Sea”, or an alien pod on “Lost In Space”, ordinary objects were turned into extraordinary props. Of course, it was the prop builders intent to create a prop that didn’t resemble the ordinary thing it was built from, because that would ruin the illusion of the prop passing for an object outside of our world and time line.

The ‘aerial drone’ and ‘anti-gravity generator’ objects are props that were crafted from ordinary terrestrial objects, with some added digital manipulation. The initial ‘aerial drones’ are basically crafted from – but not limited to – the parts from various wheel rims, toothed gear rings, gaskets, spokes, wire whisks, and pipeline pigging parts. ‘Isaac’s’ rings and discs are the same as the ‘aerial drones’, minus the wire whisks and spoke extensions. ‘Isaac’s’ ‘anti-gravity generator’ was basically envisioned and constructed from modular pipeline pigging parts, and the arched ‘I-beam’ parts were basically made from cut down wheel rims.

In these next photos, I show some of the type of ordinary ring and disc parts used to build the hoax ‘aerial drone’ and ‘anti-gravity generator’ props. Note the ordinary toothed gear ring, and one of ‘Isaac’s’ so-called ET reverse engineered discs. This is the same disc used to create part of the hoaxed ‘aerial drone’ images. Look at the interior circle of the gear disc, with its evenly spaced teeth. Then look at these same interior gear teeth clearly visible on 2/3 of the interior rim of ‘Isaac’s’ disc. This toothed gear ring gives away the disc’s terrestrial origins, and is there for one of two reasons: either the builder thought the gear teeth looked good sticking out; or the builder hoped to use the gear ring to make the prop rotate. Since the initial ‘aerial drone’ images were digitally inserted into an outdoor setting, the so-called ‘aerial drone’ witness – who claimed that the object slowly rotated – may have been setting up a scenario for a moving video image of the ‘aerial drone’ prop.

For purposes of comparison between the hoax anti-gravity generator, the hoax aerial drone, and authentic man made manufactured parts, above are photos of the hoax anti-gravity generator and the hoax aerial drone. Photos of authentic man made manufactured parts follow below.

 

 

Photo of one of ‘Isaac’s’ hoaxed ET reverse engineered ‘aerial drone’ disc parts. Note the interior teeth on the manufactured gear ring, and the same type of gear teeth clearly visible on 2/3 of the interior rim of ‘Isaac’s’ disc. Researched by Starfire Tor. [Photo:Gear Rings]

 

 

Photo of a motorcycle wheel rim, similar in design to the type of wheel rims used to create the foundation of the initial ‘aerial drone’ disc parts. A cut down wheel rim was used to create ‘Isaac’s’ hoaxed ‘anti-gravity generator I-beam’ arches. Researched by Starfire Tor. [Photo: Wheel World]

 

Photo of wire whisk kitchen utensils, of which there are hundreds of designs in varying shapes and sizes. Similar wire whisks were used to create the odd metal cage extensions on the initial ‘aerial drone’ hoax props. Researched by Starfire Tor. [Photos: Crypto Peerless, Kitchen Masters]

 

Photos of a few of the thousands of manufactured rings, discs, gaskets, and gears that can be used to build ‘UFO’ props. Researched by Starfire Tor. [Photos; Bike 2 Build, Gasket World]

 

PART I – Page 8

I had never heard of pipeline pigging, before this investigation. As it turns out, pipeline pigging is an incredibly important part of keeping the infrastructure of the modern world running smoothly. Once part of my investigation trail lead me to pipeline pigging, I sent copies of ‘Isaac’s’ ‘anti-gravity generator’ photos to pipeline pigging experts. I asked them if they could identify the item as having any connection to pipeline pigging parts and devices. I did not give these experts any background on the ET reverse engineering claim.

Yes, confirmed the experts, the object in the photo is mainly constructed of modular pipeline pigging devices and parts. They had never seen pipeline pigging exactly like the one in the photo, but explained that this type of modular pipeline pigging was what a design would look like of someone mixed and matched modular and individual parts. According to the experts, there are hundreds of pipeline pigging modular parts, with potentially thousands of unique designs possible. Just to be sure, I asked these same experts if anything about pipeline pigging involved anything super secret or anything involving ET reverse engineering. After they stopped laughing, the answer was of course: no. Pipeline pigging is very terrestrial. They got a big kick thinking that someone was trying to pass off pipeline pigging parts as ET technology.

I’ve since gotten a good education and admiration of pipeline pigging. As one site describes it “pipeline pigging is a device that moves through the inside of a pipeline for the purpose of cleaning, dimensioning, or inspecting”. There are over 500 different types of pipeline pigging, starting from the very simple to the highly complex. Some are so sophisticated that they come equipped with signaling antenna and satellite links. Pipeline pigging parts include antenna, discs, and all manner of pigging shapes. Different pieces and parts can be put together like an erector set, and are called multiple disk stacking. The experts thought that a pipeline pigging horizontal clamp ring type quick opening closure looked very similar to the ‘dragonfly drone’ body part. They also thought that the pigging pipeline device on ‘Isaac’s’ site had a pipeline pigging signaller antenna on the end, along with disc segments and extended roller guides.

One site describes their pipeline pigging devices, called ‘Intelligent Pigging’ like this: “Modern pigging systems are highly sophisticated sets of equipment that consist of a standard 5-6 finned pig with an intelligent transmitter that has a global positioning system fixed on it to tell the exact location of the pig inside the pipeline while it is on the move. Along with the GPS positioner there are a host of other instruments like the internal camera that takes live video of the pipe condition inside while the pig is moving, the thickness gauge that constantly measures the thickness of the wall of the pipe as the pig moves.

Another site describes their sophisticated pipeline pigging like this: “Our pigging has an advanced, high-res MFL inspection tool combining magnetic field sensor, residual field sensor, geometry inspection, IDOD determination, and INS/GPS survey data.

Here are some good web sites supplying information and photographs of pipeline pigging. Pipeline pigging photographs, found below, originate from these web sites.

http://www.tdwilliamson.com/pigtdw/pipe_pig.html

http://www.pigtek.com/products6.htm

http://www.ppsa-online.com/

http://www.ppsa-online.com/about-pigs.php

http://www.ppsa-online.com/buyers-guide.php

http://www.ppsa-online.com/papers.php

http://www.pipelineengineering.com/stdprods_utilitypigs_mandrel.php

http://www.engineersedge.com/fluid_flow/pipeline-pigs.htm

http://www.peb.nl/products/photo%20gallery/more%20information%20pigging.htm

http://www.enduropls.com/index.jsp?pLink=adv

http://www.girardind.com/articles/art-of-pigging.htm

 

PART I – Page 9

Here are photos of actual pipeline pigging devices and parts. Take note of the uniquely designed and interchangeable modular pipeline pigging components, and the modular look of ‘Isaac’s’ hoaxed ‘anti-gravity generator’ device. Note the extension rollers on some of the pipeline pigging devices, which are similar to the six roller extension parts on ‘Isaac’s’ fake ‘anti-gravity generator’ device. Also note the end signaller spokes, on some of the authentic pipeline pigs, ‘Isaac’ used those end modular connectors to attach his hoaxed ‘anti-gravity generator’ end spokes. The authentic pipeline pigging disc and ring component parts, as well as ring rolling gaskets, speak for themselves. The likeness, to the modular design of “Isaac’s’ ‘anti-gravity generator’ and parts of the rings and discs also found in the digitally manipulated ‘aerial drone’ images, are clear.

For purposes of comparison, between the hoax anti-gravity generator and the authentic man made pipe-line pigging parts, above are photos of the hoax anti-gravity generator. Photos of authentic man made pipe-line pigging follow below.

Photos of authentic uniquely designed and interchangeable modular pipeline pigging components. Note the extension rollers on some of the pipeline pigging devices, which are similar to the six roller extension parts on ‘Isaac’s’ fake ‘anti-gravity generator’ device. Also note the end signaller spokes, on some of the ‘pigs’, which are similarly positioned on ‘Isaac’s’ fake ‘anti-gravity generator’ device. Researched by Starfire Tor. [Photos: PPSA, Enduropls, Pipeline Engineering]

Photos of authentic pipeline pigging disc and ring component parts, a ring rolling gasket,. Note the similarity to the modular design of “Isaac’s’ ‘anti-gravity generator’ and parts of the rings and discs also found in the digitally manipulated ‘aerial drone’ images. Researched by Starfire Tor. [Photos: PPSA, PEBNI]

 

PART I – Page 10

In order to fully appreciate the ‘aerial drone’ claims’ potential for truth or lies, it’s important to investigate and determine whether any part of the claims might be based in anything tangible and documented. As it happens, certain basics of the ‘aerial drone’ claims are based in tangible reality … although this tangible reality is not related to anything extraterrestrial. Specifically, these basic factual tie-in elements involve the long-time existence of actual human invented and constructed aerial drones, also known as UAV or unmanned aerial vehicles.

Remote controlled drone surveillance is a booming industry, including US military drones with weapons fire and other tactical capabilities. Such drones weren’t developed from reverse engineered ET technology. They were inspired, in large part, from the long time hobby of flying ‘radio planes’, which were remote controlled miniature planes and helicopters. Years ago I uncovered a UFO hoax, where someone had built a miniature remote controlled ‘UFO’ looking prop, filmed it in flight, and tried to pass the film off as an authentic ‘UFO’. This particular UFO hoax had some UFO researchers stumped, and other UFO researchers backing the filmed ‘UFO’ as genuine. The problem arose because an examination of the film showed no strings from which the hovering UFO was being manipulated, and no image rendering or image manipulation artifacts. This was before the onset of the digital age of special effects software, so that faking a ‘UFO’ in flight had a limited means of construction available to the hoaxer. No one had considered that a remote controlled miniature might be involved, until I exposed that the hovering ‘UFO’ was indeed a remote controlled miniature.

The photographs of the claimed aerial ‘drones’, which were presented to the public, are rife with visual and physical oddities … as well as digital artifacts, which can be seen when the photographs are inspected by an expert in digital image manipulation. Even with the naked eye, it’s obvious that the design of the .’aerial drones’ lack aerodynamic elements. This meant that the hovering object, depicted in the photographs, could not sustain flight by conventional means. Nor is there any visual distortion around the ‘aerial drones’, which might indicate a new or alien form of flight generating energy. Some sort of localized distortion effect should be present, even if a non conventional flight system was in use.

If these objects were literally at the outdoor location, as claimed, they were not held aloft by either a balloon, a helicopter, a crane, or amateur radio controlled devices. Any helicopter rotors would have created a down wash effect on the object, thereby causing violent movement of the object and preventing it from remaining motionless – or near motionless – in mid air. The balloon, as a lofting device, would show tell tale signs of a tether [unless edited out], and would move the object subject to the wind’s effect upon the balloon. A crane would have similar challenges as a balloon tether, but to lesser degree because the crane would be stationary – although the crane might encounter a slight sway depending on ground and weather conditions. Any amateur radio controlled drone would not be able to achieve a dead stop in mid air, and would be unlikely to fly because of its lack of aerodynamic design. None of the ‘aerial drone’ photos contain any hints of encountering natural weather patterns, nor of utilizing an esoteric power supply affecting the object, the location, or the localized space-time continuum.

The first series of ‘aerial drones’ are oddly shaped, and have the appearance of being primitive and awkward in design. The odd shape alone didn’t bother me, per se, because actual human invented and built aerial drones come in many odd shapes and sizes. Some of the authentic aerial drones have vertical take off and hovering capabilities, others contain helicopter like rotors, some are unusual looking fixed wing aircraft, some are saucer shaped, some are triangle shaped, some are diamond shaped, some are spherical shaped, some are rocket shaped, some are stealth by design, and others have combined design and application properties.

Even though the investigated ‘aerial drone’ images are hoaxed, this does not mean that actual aerial drones and unusual craft aren’t being witnessed in California and elsewhere. It is very possible for someone to witness a strange aerial drone aka UAV, and it not be connected to the ‘aerial drone’ hoax. This is why, if someone claims to have seen an unusual aerial craft, it should not be dismissed out of hand. But because of the ‘aerial drone’ hoax, it makes it harder for real UAV witnesses to be taken seriously. This is part of the harm that such a hoax does, which is to contaminate the field of UFO and related research.

Here are some news items about UAV flying over California in 2007. Keep in mind that this article only documents these particular UAVs over California, meaning that this is only a glimpse into the less promoted UAV activity in the skies. This press release refers to UAV helping to fight the California Zaca Fire, which had been burning since July 4, 2007.

http://www.santamariatimes.com/articles/2007/08/17/news/breaking/breaking01.txt

Flying drone photographs Zaca Fire
By Times Staff
8-17-2007

An unmanned aerial vehicle equipped with a camera flew over the massive Zaca Fire on Thursday, providing a tool to peer through smoke and pinpoint hot spots while delivering real-time data, officials said. The UAV based at Edwards Air Force Base near Lancaster flew at 25,000 feet above the fire, before taking a similar tour of blazes in Northern California. The cooperative agreement grew out of the U.S. Forest Service assisting NASA after the Columbia space shuttle broke apart on its way to landing at Cape Canaveral, Fla., in 2003.

http://calfire.blogspot.com/2007/08/nasa-predator-drone-is-flying-missions.html

Friday, August 24, 2007
NASA Predator drone is flying missions on California fires

Drones Spot Fires

NASA calls their version of the aircraft “Ikhana,” a name derived from a Native American Choctaw word that means intelligent, conscious or aware. Dryden Research completed a six-month process to obtain a Certificate of Authorization from the FAA allowing Ikhana to fly wildfire-sensing missions in the national air space of the western states. [Pred_2] A NASA Predator B drone is flying missions over Californian wild fires to test out new gear for spotting fires, the agency reports. The first flight of the series Aug. 16 captured images of California wildfires, including the Zaca Fire in Santa Barbara County.

 

PART I – Page 11

Here is a photographic grouping of some of the known authentic aerial drones, also called UAV or unmanned aerial vehicles. These drones have either been declassified or never were classified. The flight technology the public sees today has secretly been in development and/or use for at least 30 to 40 years before being introduced to the public. The same goes for other technology. There have been times when secret flight technology has been inadvertently witnessed by unanticipated and uniformed outsiders. The batwing B-2 stealth bomber is a good example of this type of UFO misidentification situation. In flight, depending upon the angle the B-2 is viewed from, the stealth bomber can literally look like a flying saucer. But because of its stealth design, the B-2 has a near zero radar signature. This means that an eyewitness can catch a glimpse of the B-2 in flight, but radar equipment cannot see the B-2 on the scope.

This in no way means that all ‘UFO’ sightings can be explained away as a misidentified black ops project, because they can’t. It means that the most competent UFO researchers are the ones who are educated in a wide range of ‘UFO’ misidentification parameters. This education goes a long way to weeding out both misidentified ‘UFOs’ and intentional hoaxed ‘UFOs’. Only with this weeding process can a legitimate ‘UFO’ sighting gain credibility.

This means that any aerial drones, not available to the public and part of a black ops project, would have capabilities and designs well beyond the actual aerial drones seen in the following photos. Keep this fact in mind, as to whether an aerial drone has been reverse engineered from ET technology, or human invented and built on its own.

For purposes of comparison, to the variety of authentic aerial drones aka unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), here is a photo of the hoax aerial drone. Photos of authentic unmanned aerial vehicles follow.

 

Photo of UAV CL-327 Guardian. Researched by Starfire Tor. [Photo: US Navy]

 

Photo of UAV Cypher. Researched by Starfire Tor. [Photo: Sikorsky]

Photo of UAV Gyrodyne QH-50D, built from 1946-1969. Researched by Starfire Tor. [Photo:Gyrodyne]

Photo of UAV microdrone. Researched by Starfire Tor. {Photo: UK Police]

Photo pf UAV X50A Dragonfly. Researched by Starfire Tor. [Photo: Boeing]

Photo of UAV Westland Recon Drone. Researched by Starfire Tor. [Photo: Westland]

Photo of UAV Navio. Researched by Starfire Tor. [Photo: Navio]

Photo of UAV Dragon Warrior. Researched by Starfire Tor. [Photo: Sikorsky]

Photo of UAV Aerohawk, from Sky Technology. Researched by Starfire Tor. [Photo: Sky Technology]

Photo of UAV Darkstar. Researched by Starfire Tor. [Photo: Lockheed Martin]

Photo of UAV Predator B, from the US military. The predator is used on the battlefield, but also to view natural disasters and guard borders. Researched by Starfire Tor. [Photo: US Air Force]

Photo of UAV drone X45c, which takes its design from the piloted stealth B-2 bomber. The X47 version has wingtips that fold up to gain space, when parked on aircraft carriers. The ultimate goal of this UAV is to not only be a stealth weapons and surveillance UAV, but to be able to take off and land on aircraft carriers. Researched by Starfire Tor. [Photo: Boeing]

 

PART II – Page 12

UPDATE: In late October 2007, and through November 2007, Dell owned Alienware ran a contest to advertise its upcoming Area-51 M15x and M17x laptops. This contest was advertised as “Decipher the Alien Message and Win a Trip to New York City”, and featured the same character symbols as those found on the ‘aerial drone’ and ‘anti-gravity generator’ hoax images and objects. With this revelation, the ‘aerial drone’ hoax has been outed as a viral marketing scheme to advertise the Alienware Area 51 computer laptops. Dell computers purchased Alienware computers in 2006. The alien message contest was advertised at:

http://www.alienware.com/contest_pages/contest_declassified.aspx

There may be some, for whatever reason drives them, who want to promote the idea that Alienware was so smitten by the ‘aerial drone’ character symbols that the company simply “borrowed” those character symbols for use in their contest. Let me be very clear about this: Alienware didn’t “borrow” anything. In the corporate world, it’s legal suicide to go around “borrowing” alphabets – and concepts – that don’t belong to you. Alienware would not jeopardize itself by engaging in that type of illegal behavior. And for those of you, who think that Alienware did everything legally because they made arrangements with ‘Isaac’ … think again. The only way, that ‘Isaac’ could have legally signed off on the ‘alien alphabet’, is if he were the creator of that alphabet. Since I already outed the ‘aerial drone’ and ‘anti-gravity generator’ as hoaxes, even before Alienware’s viral marketing scheme was outed months later, it’s safe to say that Alienware didn’t “borrow” an alphabet from a stolen black ops project involving ET reverse engineered technology. Such a notion is Illogical. Had Alienware been inspired by the ‘aerial’ drone’ character symbols, instead of having been associated with them, they could have created an alien alphabet of their own for their “Decipher the Alien Message” contest.

Here is evidence of that contest, which includes photos showing Alienware showing off it’s contest using the same character symbols that are found on the hoaxed ‘aerial drone’ and ‘anti-gravity generator’ images, plus the same character symbols branded into their computer.

 

 

This image shows a page from the fictitious Caret Drone document as presented by the character calling himself Isaac. As can be plainly seen the so-called Aerial Drone written language or symbols are the same symbols found in the Dell owned Alien Ware computer contest “Decipher The Alien Ware Message”. See the contest photos below for symbol and letter comparison.

 

 

Photos of the October 2007 – November 2007 Dell owned Alienware Area 51 MX16 laptop linguistic contest. Starfire Tor discovered that these character symbols, found on the hoaxed ‘aerial drone’ and ‘anti-gravity generator’ images, were part of an Alienware viral marketing scheme. Researched by Starfire Tor. [Photos: Alienware]

 

 

Photo of Alienware computer, with its ‘alien’ alphabet branded below the computer’s grill. Starfire Tor discovered that these character symbols, found on the hoaxed ‘aerial drone’ and ‘anti-gravity generator’ images, were part of an Alienware viral marketing scheme from October 2007 – November 2007. The character symbols, in this arrangement, spell out ALIENWARE. Researched by Starfire Tor. [Photo: Alienware]

I was right, about the ‘aerial drone’ hoax being connected to a viral marketing scheme associated with computers, as I described in Part I of my investigative report. The viral marketing didn’t turn out to be for an XBOX 360 Halo computer game, although my research into that possibility remains valid and informative. This viral marketing scheme did turn out to be for a computer company, Alienware, that has linked its brand to legendary UFO history … Area 51. ‘Isaac’s’ hoaxed back story involved ET reverse engineering, and the brand name for legendary ET reverse engineering claims involves Area 51.

Here Are All The Links To All The Pages Of Starfire Tor’s Aerial Drone Report

Go To Part I – Page 1 Of Aerial Drone Report

Go To Part I – Page 2 Of Aerial Drone Report

Go To Part I – Page 3 Of Aerial Drone Report

Go To Part I – Page 4 Of Aerial Drone Report

Go To Part I – Page 5 Of Aerial Drone Report

Go To Part I – Page 6 Of Aerial Drone Report

Go To Part I – Page 7 Of Aerial Drone Report

Go To Part I – Page 8 Of Aerial Drone Report

Go To Part I – Page 9 Of Aerial Drone Report

Go To Part I – Page 10 Of Aerial Drone Report

Go To Part I – Page 11 Of Aerial Drone Report

Go To Part II – Page 12 Of Aerial Drone Report

..If you have any experiences or information you think Starfire Tor should review, whether on Time Shifts, Reality Shifts, Enigmas, The Paranormal, Hauntings, UFOs, etc… send it to the Research Department

Starfire Tor encourages the sharing of her material, found on her http://www.starfiretor.com website, in free sharing zones. Starfire Tor’s material is copyrighted, and if shared with others must include the full title of the material, Starfire Tor’s name as author and researcher, and the Starfire Tor web page of origin from this web site. Sharing Starfire Tor’s material, without proper acknowledgement as stated, is an act of plagiarism. Please report any infractions, with URL, to Webmaster – Sharri Lorraine

---

 

Now, the material below is included to show that a

lot of the subject matter in Linda’s video

presentation appears very similar to the Sigil

material in the piece below.  I see a lot of common

ground between the crop circle stuff, the drone

designs, the drone lettering and the sigil

information expounded upon below. 

 

Maybe it’s just me but now, when I look at crop circles, I see giant Sigils.  Well, that opens up a whole different perspective on these things, now doesn’t it ?

 

If these things are Sigils (which I believe they are), then this subject takes on a truly sinister aspect.  If they are created by “EBEs” or “aliens” these beings are not here for our benefit, as many are hanging their hopes upon.

 

See if you see the same thing.