Chemtrails,Cloud Whitening And The Business Of Climate Change

In the Copenhagen Consensus 2012 project is a way to deal with international climate change. The 2009 Copenhagen Consensus project lay the foundation for this recent call by climate change alarmists.

They argue that cooling the planet by reflecting more of the sun’s rays back to space is the only way to preform climate engineering.

One suggestion is to use “Stratospheric Aerosol Injection – where a precursor of sulfur dioxide would be continuously injected into the stratosphere, forming a layer of aerosols to reflect sunlight”.

Another approach could be “Marine Cloud Whitening, where seawater would be mixed into the atmosphere at sea to make the clouds whiter and more reflective”.

Richard Toll is a professor of Economics, Department of Economics, University of Sussex; professor of the Economics of Climate Change, Institute for Environmental Studies and Department of Spatial Economics.

He claims that geo-engineering is the only way to cool the planet. Through a global carbon tax, this process could be funded. Toll stresses climate policy is about making money to fund these projects.

Reducing greenhouse gases are best achieved by adherence to a global carbon tax. While emissions reduction will be lenient in the beginning, over time the regulations should become more stringent.

The price tag for climate change should begin at about $1.80 per ton of carbon produced.

Watch Toll’s explanation of his research.

A technology-led climate change policy will focus on manufacturing and producing low carbon emitting energy technologies. The carbon tax will fund the research and development of these technologies.

By using the corporate model, climate change purveyors hope to succeed at building technologies that reduce emissions as well as fund the cause.
Manufacturing of these products will be high demand as the governments of the world are forced to comply with an international agreement to mitigate Co2 levels.

However, as funding is funneled into subsidizing manufacturing and development rather than research, the purpose of claiming good for the plant while reaping huge profits is clear.

As the governments of nations prepare for adaptation policies, agriculture and tourism will be affected most.

Vacationers will choose more hospitable destinations.

Farmers will choose appropriate crops to weather the rising temperatures of their area.

The housing market will have to account for the warmer temperatures within their design and production; not to mention that where people choose to live will greatly alter depending on the climate.

Industrial countries will have an easier time adapting.

Third world nations will struggle as they are impacted the most.

While poorer countries will become dependent on the “humanitarian aid” of more wealthy countries, the chances of their development is lessened.

Climate change is about benefiting industry and corporatism while building itself off the backs of the poor.

These papers explain the cost effectiveness of their projects, how they intend to raise the revenue for them and how they plan to sell the idea of climate change to the governments of the world.