Signs Of Hope In Orthodox - Catholic Dialogue
This group was centred on Paris and Lyons, were mostly Jesuits and Dominicans, though Louis Bouyer was an Oratorian. There was nothing formal about the group. They may not have even considered themselves to be a group at first; but they had a community of interest. They saw the Church in crisis, a church which had largely lost the working class. They believed that “secular values” were encouraged by a too stark separation in the theology of their day between “natural” and “supernatural”. They held that mankind has a natural desire for God, and that the main reason why the people were falling away was because they were starved of the sacred. This could only be rectified by liturgical reform because the people were cut off from the sacred by a completely latinised and clericalised liturgy. They subjected the theology of their time to a stringent critique. As several of them were patristic scholars, they compared the modern Church unfavourably with the Church of the Fathers. This group is immensely important because a) they had formed their ideas in France where a group of extremely able Russian Orthodox theologians had taken refuge; also b) because a young archbishop of Cracow called Carol Wojtyla and a young German theologian called Joseph Ratzinger along with others like Dom Christopher Butler OSB of Downside joined them in the council; and c) because they were involved in writing the most important Vatican II documents.
They were opposed by the so-called “conservative” position that was commonly held before the council in which the Church’s grasp of God’s revelation in Christ had been encapsulated in ever clearer propositions over the centuries under the guidance of the Holy Spirit so that all we have to do to understand Catholic Truth is to listen to the teaching of the present day Magisterium and to interpret history in the light of its teaching. History may be used to prove the truth of the modern Church’s teaching, but it is never used to criticise it. For “conservatives”, the idea that a critical study of church history could be used to call in question the present-day teaching and practice of the Church looked too much like modernism.
Tradition is only partly the transmission of ideas. It is also continuity of celebration and continuity in participation in the vision of faith and of the Christ-life. As George Florovsky wrote about patristic theology:
In the age of theological strife and incessant debates, the great Cappadocian Fathers protested against the use of dialectics, of Aristotelian syllogisms, and endeavoured to refer theology back to the vision of faith.
Patristic theology could only be “preached” or “proclaimed” – preached from the pulpit, proclaimed also in the words of prayer and in the sacred rites, and indeed manifested in the total structure of Christian life. Theology of this kind can never be separated from the life of prayer and from the exercise of virtue. “The climax of purity is the beginning of theology,” as St John the Klimakos put it. (Scala Paradisi, grade 30)
On the other hand, theology of this type is always, as it were, “propaideutic,” since its ultimate aim and purpose is to ascertain and to acknowledge the Mystery of the Living God, and indeed to bear witness to it in word and deed. Theology is not an end in itself, but a way. Theology, and even the “dogmas” present no more than an “intellectual contour” of the revealed truth, and a “noetic” testimony to it. Only in the act of faith is this “contour” filled with content. Christological formulas are fully meaningful only for those who have encountered the Living Christ, and have received and acknowledged Him as God and Saviour, and are dwelling by faith in Him, in His body, the Church. In this sense, theology is never a self-explanatory discipline. It is constantly appealing to the vision of faith. “What we have seen and heard we have announced to you.” Apart from this “announcement”, theological formulas are empty and of no consequence….To follow the Fathers does not mean to quote them. To follow the Fathers means to acquire their “mind”, their phronema.
It is by sharing their “mind” that we can think, pray and act within Tradition. Only if we have the vision of faith, given by the Spirit, can we make head or tale of the Truth that the formulas express. When I was studying theology in the early sixties, we did not call the theology of de Lubac, Danielou etc resourcement theology; we called it kerygmatic theology. Reading Florovsky, we can begin to understand why: it is embedded in the liturgical tradition of the Church and proclaimed in the kerygma, and theological reflection can never separate it’s formulations from the Christian ecclesial life of faith that gives them substance.
Tradition being the product of the Holy Spirit and the Church acting in synergy, popes, bishops, general councils and faithful are subject to it, and not the other way round. It is the context in which the New Testament was written, its books were recognised and are read and interpreted, the liturgies of the Church were formed and have developed, where dogmas have been expressed in words and interpreted. If you want to see the role of Tradition in the Catholic Church, then read the teachings of Vatican II and some of the words and actions of Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI.
Since we have used the papacy as an example of an institution that needs correction by Tradition, I shall now give you a short passage from Yves Congar OP on church authority. He was an important peritus or expert in Vatican II and belonged to the resourcement group, a friend of Joseph Ratzinger. It is a good illustration of the past correcting the present, and was published near the end of the Council in 1964. It is called in French “Pour une Eglise Servante et Pauvre”, which shows us that Pope Francis is on track!
We have…studied…the history of the expression Vicarius Christi as a papal title. The use of the title has continued but its meaning has changed. Its older sense in Catholic theology was that of a visible representative of a transcendent and heavenly power which was actually active in its earthly representative. The context and atmosphere surrounding the idea were those of the actuality of the action of God, Christ and the saints working in their representative. This is a very sacramental, iconological concept linked to the idea of the constant presences of God and the celestial powers in our earthly sphere. It is this quality of actuality and of “vertical” descent and a presence which has its source in the celebrated text in Luke 10: 16, “Whoever listens to you listens to me, and whoever rejects you rejects me.” Although this quality does not disappear, it is overlaid by another quality which is also not entirely new – what is new is its marked predominance over the former one – namely a “power” given at the beginning by someone, by Christ, to his “vicar”, that is, to a person who takes his place and who hands on to those who come after him, in an historical sequence of transmission and succession, the power thus received. The predominant feature is not a vertical movement, an actual presence, an iconological representation, but the “horizontal” transmission of a power vested in the earthly jurisdiction and which, though received from on high, is genuinely possessed by this jurisdiction which uses it in the same way as any authority may use the power attached to it.
The modern “mystique” of authority in the Church comes from the movement whose characteristics we just described. But, and this is where its strength lies, once again, strength comes from the mystique and not from the legal aspect – it has combined the actuality of the power possessed with the vision of the “vertical” descent of divine power upon the actual historic authority…..I believe that the spirit of the time introduced something new into this continuity [of Tradition], namely, a certain legalistic aspect…..legalism is characteristic of an ecclesiology unrelated to spiritual anthropology, and for which the word ecclesia indicates, not so much the body of the faithful, as the system, the apparatus, the impersonal depositary of the system of rights whose representatives are the clergy or, as it is now called, the hierarchy, and ultimately the pope and the Roman Curia.
The movement back to the sources must go forward until it restores a completely evangelical concept of authority, a concept that willbe fully supernatural and fully communal. We are on the right road, we have gone far to recover the agape beyond mere moralism, the function of the laity, the community, and our mission and service as dimensions essential to and co-extensive with. We have better understanding of the the religious implications of the covenant, and these involve our acceptance of God’s gift through faith, and the life of this gift through agape the diakonia, witness and thanksgiving….Since we are returning to a pre-Constantinian situation in a pagan world, since we are aware that we are in a minority, that it is our task to preach Jesus Christ, we are doubtless approaching a period in which, while we shall lose nothing of value acquired in the course of history, we shall recover wholly evangelical ways of exercising authority in the new world in which God calls us to serve him.
The change from a sacramental way of interpreting the authority of the Church to a legalistic one arose from the habit of popes of comparing their authority with that emperors, and of archbishops like St Thomas a Becket with that of kings. Also there was the separation of theology from cult as theological activity went away from monasteries and cathedrals and into universities. This weakened its essential connection with the liturgy and Christian living. As the Church came to be seen as a world-wide perfect society, held together by papal jurisdiction, so jurisdiction was separated from the celebration of the Eucharist in which Christ himself is actively engaged in deepening our understanding through the liturgy, as we collaborate through humble obedience. Finally, to fit in with the idea of the Church as a perfect society, the Eucharist and the Church lost the sense of participating in the heavenly liturgy.
But it is in the Roman liturgy’s participation in the heavenly liturgy that St Peter is really connected with the church of Rome, and the Roman Church is united to all other places where the Eucharist is celebrated. St Peter and St Paul are buried there, and their bodies await resurrection on the Last Day.
The Roman Eucharist, like the Eucharist in Constantinople and Moscow, embraces heaven where our divisions don’t reach as well as earth, but the Romans cannot help but celebrate their special relationship with these two apostles; and this relationship is bound to show from time to time in the words of the Roman bishop.
The way to reunion with the Orthodox is, as far as we are concerned, the way of making the insights of Vatican II a concrete reality. There is much yet to be done, but it is marked out for us in the documents of the Council. We must have a liturgy that celebrates our participation in the liturgy of heaven. This is yet to be realised. Going back to the pre-conciliar past won’t help because the extraordinary rite is no better than the novus ordo in that regard. We must have true collegiality both world-wide and regionally and allow the episcopates in the regions to make their own decisions. Collegiality and primacy belong together; but this is yet to become a reality in the Church. Here I have hopes that Pope Francis will go further than either John Paul II or Benedict XVI were able to do. Almost finally, we must work together with our Orthodox brothers and sisters to evangelise the world. We must never accept the dominance of secularism. If we do, then we are already beaten. We must take it on: we have resources that the secularists cannot even dream about; if they did, they wouldn’t be secularists.
Finally, as the madman Grisha said to the boy Prokher (St Seraphim of Sarov), when he asked how he could re-build the Church, we must, “Pray, pray, pray.”
.
Source: http://fatherdavidbirdosb.blogspot.com/2013/07/signs-of-hope-in-orthodox-catholic.html
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).