TradCatKnight: Archbishop Lefebvre: Questionable priestly ordinations in the conciliar Church

— A letter of Archbishop Lefebvre:

[ Editor’s note:  In this transcription, we have left unchanged the spelling and style found in the handwritten letter of the Archbishop. ]
 

Commentary

Archbishop Lefebvre relies on two principal arguments to assert that the new sacraments, especially ordinations, are henceforth questionable: 
* the evolution of the rites; 
* and the defect in intention. 
The new rites of the sacraments promulgated by the conciliar Church are probably valid since they have been promulgated in the typical editions in Latin¹.  But that does not prevent numerous sacraments from being invalid in practice, for the two reasons quoted above. 
Archbishop Lefebvre said that in his opinion a great number of new masses were invalid – while admitting the validity of the new rite in itself. 
Bp Tissier de Mallerais, in his sermon from June 29, 2016 at Econe, spoke as follows concerning the rite of ordination for priests: 

In an article that appeared in Le Sel de la terre 54 on the subject of the validity of the new rite of episcopal consecration, after showing that the rite in itself is probably valid, we added: 

And we quoted the remarks of Archbishop Lefebvre on the subject of the episcopal consecration of Bp Daneels, auxiliary bishop of Brussels: 

“It is frightening…Was this bishop really consecrated?