Ocean Fertilization: Another UN Scheme to Slow Kill the Planet

Susanne Posel, Contributor
White Owl Conspiracy

The UN Environmental Program has many versions of geo-engineering up their sleeve to ultimately “manipulate the environment”. The thinking behind geo-engineering is to “reduce greenhouse gas emissions enough to keep the planet from warming to a dangerous degree”, however they admit that the “feasibility and effectiveness of these interventions are uncertain and there are unknown risks to the environment and humans.”

Chemtrails, which are just now receiving media coverage, are but one way the global Elite was manipulating our biosphere. Ocean fertilization is a method of CO2 sequestering that is supported by the globalist think-tank The Royal Society.

The technique uses iron and “other nutrients” that induce microscopic marine plants to absorb CO2 through the natural process of photosynthesis. As they inject the CO2, the plankton releases it back into the ocean at a lower depth.

Stanford and Oregon State Universities have suggested that the $100 billion venture to fertilize our oceans is not a viable course of reducing CO2 in the earth’s atmosphere. They found that the process of pumping CO2 into plankton, or algae, does not have the desired effect of converting the CO2 to the deeper levels of the ocean.

Back in 2010, the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC), which is part of UNESCO, published a studythat approved of ocean fertilization as a “preventative” measure of sequestering CO2 in the deep oceans.

Dr. Michael Lutz, lead author of the study, said: “This discovery is very surprising. If, during natural plankton blooms, less carbon actually sinks to deep water than during the rest of the year, then it suggests that the Biological Pump leaks. More material is recycled in shallow water and less sinks to depth, which makes sense if you consider how this ecosystem has evolved in a way to minimize loss. Ocean fertilization schemes, which resemble an artificial summer, may not remove as much carbon dioxide from the atmosphere as has been suggested because they ignore the natural processes revealed by this research.”

At the Ocean Iron Fertilization Symposium at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), topics of discussion were environmental dangers, economic implications and the overall effectiveness of ocean fertilization. Dr. Hauke Kite-Powell, of the Marine Policy Center at WHOI, estimated the possible future value of ocean fertilization at $100 billion of the emerging international carbon trading market.

In a press release , WHOI revealed data taken from studies in Massachusetts at the annual diatom bloom, a natural cycle of the ecosystem. They absorb carbon dioxide and the “the North Atlantic is critical to this process; it’s responsible for more than 20 percent of the ocean’s uptake of CO2.”

Studies into the allocation of this bloom are funded by the National Science Foundation’s Division of Ocean Sciences (NSFDOS). This government agency, represented by Don Rice hopes to use this natural phenomena as a CO2 sequestering scheme.

Researchers said that: “Springtime blooms of microscopic plants in the ocean absorb enormous quantities of carbon dioxide, much like our forests, emitting oxygen via photosynthesis. Their growth contributes to the oceanic uptake of carbon dioxide, amounting globally to about one-third of the carbon dioxide we put into the air each year through the burning of fossil fuels. An important question is how this ‘biological pump’ for carbon might change in the future as our climate evolves.”

Professor Rosemary Rayfuse, expert in International Law and the Law of the Sea at the University of New South Wales, Australia, asserted that ocean fertilization is not approved under carbon credit regulatory schemes and sale of its offsets on unregulated markets results in fraud.

The “dumping” of CO2 into the oceans amounts to polluting the waters. Rayfuse, citing the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) stated that: “There is no point trying to ameliorate the effects of climate change by destroying the oceans — the very cradle of life on earth. Simply doing more and bigger of that which has already been demonstrated to be ineffective and potentially more harmful than good is counter-intuitive at best.”

Both the Royal Society and the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) claim that ocean fertilization address the urgent need for environmental, social and legal schemes that international regimes must implement in their efforts to continue geo-engineering experiments. By reducing CO2 emissions by the use of all forms of geo-engineering, the UN simultaneously wants to control those efforts as an exploration for potential monetary gains. However the scientific community asserts that policymakers and the general public need to participate in these secret discussion as they are directly affected by their ethical, social and geopolitical potentials.

Scientists are looking to take advantage of the oceans to justify natural cycles and contributions to the Earth’s climate, while simultaneously finding new ways to exploit this resource for their globalist agendas. Under the guise of using plankton for CO2 sequestering, data is being entered into computer models to see how this new integration can be used to maximize carbon credit profits.

—-
Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism Our alternative news site is dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporate-funded mainstream media. You can find us on our Facebook page.