Monsanto’s Tricky Plan To Defeat GMO Labeling?

OrganicGardening.com

Okay—let’s not miss the point about the Stanford “study” on organic food, the one released in early September that concludes that the scientific literature “lacks strong evidence that organic foods are significantly more nutritious than conventional foods.”

Every reaction I’ve seen in the press grants that maybe organic food isn’t more nutritious, but it’s healthier in many other ways, like much lower amounts of toxic agricultural chemicals, and so on. But there are many studies that show that organic food is indeed more nutritious. To really understand those studies, you have to know who paid for them.

If Monsanto or Cargill is paying a researcher at a land-grant university to look into the nutritional value of foods, there’s a temptation there to work the data in favor of the company paying the bills, especially if they like your work and order more studies

Read More:  Monsanto’s Tricky Plan To Defeat GMO Labeling?

2012-09-27 23:43:09

Source: http://www.whiteowlconspiracy.com/2012/09/monsantos-tricky-plan-to-defeat-gmo.html