Americans are fed up. The establishment previously and astutely predicted how fed up Americans would become as the government has rehearsed for massive civil unrest over and over. In fact, the American sheeple of this country have discovered how correct the Independent Media has been regarding the criminals who have hijacked our government. However, this is a small consolation for what lies ahead for the American people.
Late last week, Mike Adams and myself received inquiries for interviews from the Washington Post and the New York Times, respectively. In each case, as I have previously reported, the reporter wanted to know if we knew about any Patriot groups who would ferment violence in reaction to a Hillary Clinton election. I told the reporter that the only way Clinton could was through voter fraud, but I knew of no effort to respond in a violent manner. It was compare to Mike and myself that reporters were trying to create a narrative in which we would be blamed for fermenting violence in the face of a stolen election.
This premise is flawed on its face. First, Mike and myself never advocate for violence. Although, the war criminal, George Soros, should already be in prison for his Nazi war crimes against humanity and our special operation forces would be justified in removing him to a rendition site out of the country, for the good of the country. This is all legal as the tenets of the NDAA could applied. Beyond this, violence will accomplish nothing, but to promote more violence. I told the NY Times reporter that I do not condone violence, but I would support a national boycott against all businesses that benefit in any manner from the free trade agreements and illegal immigration. America has the ability to bleed these businesses dry. The average margin of profit is about 4%. If only 10% of the country would begin to shop locally and bank in the less corrupt credit unions, we could drive these businesses into oblivion and this would create more a problem for the globalists than any act of violence in respond to a stolen election.
It is no coincidence that my NY Times contact happened in the same time frame that I was receiving evidence of massive voter fraud in Arizona as well Electoral College tampering. I stopped believing in coincidences a long time ago.
Early last week, I began to receive information on two fronts regarding Arizona politics. I received electronic proof of massive voter fraud, with regard to the upcoming election inside of Maricopa County, Arizona. I know the person who provided the proof and the evidence, and in my opinion, the evidence is damning. I fully expect this evidence will be used in a legal challenge to the election by the Trump people, who I have forwarded this information to.
The statistics related to voter fraud. According to my insider source, revealed that the Post Offices in Arizona have processed 2.7 million early ballots. The entire state of Arizona only has 6.93 million people, men, women and children.
Here are the voter registration totals for all of Arizona.
|Election Year (Click for more information)||Registered Voters||Ballots Cast in the Primary|
Just a cursory look at the numbers show that anywhere from 25-33% of registered voters cast votes in a primary election with data going back six years. That is not the important statistic.
The important statistic is that with three weeks left to the general election, when this data was provided to me, 2.7 million Arizona voters, voted early. This means that 80% of Arizona’s eligible voters have voted early. do you find this believable? These numbers clearly represent ballot stuffing. Arizona, and for that matter, not anywhere else in the country, has every had an 80% voter turnout and Arizona already had this kind of turn out a full 21 days before the election. Are we also to believe that nobody is going to the polls and the voters are only voting by early ballot (79% of the total possible vote)? These numbers only add up to one thing. Arizona is the site of massive voter fraud. And with the current state of the Department of Justice, run by Loretta Lynch (mob), where would complaints about voter fraud go? Who would respond to them? The answer is, nobody will respond. Who in the media is going to report this kind of blatant and obvious voter fraud? CNN? Fox? ABC? Hold on to your hat it is about to get a whole lot worse.
For a couple of weeks, I have been receiving information from someone I know personally, who has played a significant role in Arizona politics. This person told me, without blinking an eye, that inducements and outright bribes have been offered to Arizona’s electors. The person knows of one instance of direct collusion with “shadowy forces”. Although no mention of a specific people and organizations involved in the attempted bribery were mentioned, it does not take much imagination to know we are ultimately referring to George Soros and the Clinton Foundation.
I asked the source about payment sources and the answer I received was offshore through a laundered account paid to a phony shell corporation that had been set up. Again, it does not take much imagination to know that we speaking about either HSBC Bank or Wells Fargo, or both, since they have both been busted for these kinds of money laundering operations for which they paid a fine and nobody went to jail.
When we are talking about bribing electors, we are taking about a finite population. In Arizona, that number would be 11 Republican electors. In the face of what they will call unfounded rumors, will these people open up their phone and banking records as well as their travel histories? I have made an official inquiry to the Arizona Secretary of State and have yet to receive a response.
By the way, the elector in questions claimed that they had not accepted any money and that they only had knowledge about how the bribery would take place. The proof is in the pudding. Even with the rampant and apparent early voting election fraud that is taking place, I do not believe that Clinton can win. I have a hard time finding anyone who supports this despot. Therefore, we have a couple of bell-weather indicators of voting fraud. The first would be the exit polling, which Trump supporters should be independently conducting. If the polls don’t match the results, then one has a major problem with voter fraud. Second, if the voters in Arizona are refused the demands that many will make to vote on a paper ballot as opposed to George Soros voting machines. Arizona is one of 16 states in which George Soros voting machines in play for this election.
What is happening in Arizona is happening all across the country.
Insider accounts and Arizona Secretary of State figures are not needed to show collusion in the upcoming election. When a long-time Clinton ally has one source that has supplied voting machines to 16 states, we have evidence of all the collusion we need in order to show intent to commit massive voter fraud.
In the five days leading up to October 26, a White House petition that calls on Congress to hold an emergency session about removing the Smartmatic voting machines received more than 70,000 signatures.
Previously, the Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology, stated that one of the simplestand most effective ways to alter the outcome of an election would be to gain access to a company that controls the voting machines and then have the incriminating data self-delete.
Speaking of Arizona, the Epoch Times is reporting that in “Arizona, a new political committee linked to Soros is being accused of violating Arizona election laws. The AP reported that an attorney representing Republican incumbent Bill Montgomery’s reelection in Maricopa County filed a campaign finance complaint against the Soros-funded Arizona Safety & Justice.
The complaint states that, “Soros has been spending millions of dollars this year to support Democrats in prosecutor races around the country and all but one of his favored candidates have won.” The implication is clear, even if the Clinton Democrats and George Soros are caught cheating, who is going to prosecute them. Under this plan, a mini-Loretta Lynch (Mob) will be in charge of any investigation. Do you think the Clinton forces have been planning for sometime. Now we know where all that ill-gotten Clinton Foundation money is going.
Smartmatic’s website had, at one time, listed the 16 states in which its machines are being used for the upcoming general election, but has since removed that information. The 16 states are
Even more damning evidence appears when one compares the states who do not bind their Electoral College electors to the popular vote.
From Mike Adams’ Natural News:
“You might be shocked to learn that only 29 states require Electors to case their electoral votes in accordance with the popular vote of their state. Those 29 states, listed here are:
Alabama (Code of Ala. SS17-19-2)
Alaska (Alaska Stat. SS15.30.090)
California (Election Code SS6906)
Colorado (CRS SS1-4-304)
Connecticut (Conn. Gen. Stat. SS9-176)
Delaware (15 Del C SS4303)
District of Columbia (SS1-1312(g))
Florida (Fla. Stat. SS103.021(1))
Hawaii (HRS SS14-28)
Maine (21-A MRS SS805)
Maryland (Md Ann Code art 33, SS8-505)
Massachusetts (MGL, ch. 53, SS8)
Michigan (MCL SS168.47)
Mississippi (Miss Code Ann SS23-15-785)
Montana (MCA SS13-25-104)
Nevada (NRS SS298.050)
New Mexico (NM Stat Ann SS1-15-9)
North Carolina (NC Gen Stat SS163-212)
Ohio (ORC Ann SS3505.40)
Oklahoma (26 Okl St SS10-102)
Oregon (ORS SS248.355)
South Carolina (SC Code Ann SS7-19-80)
Tennessee (Tenn Code Ann SS2-15-104(c))
Utah (Utah Code Ann SS20A-13-304)
Vermont (17 VSA SS2732)
Washington (RCW SS29.71.020)
Wisconsin (Wis Stat SS7.75)
Wyoming (Wyo Stat SS22-19-108)
As that same page writes:
Over the years, however, despite legal oversight, a number of electors have violated their state’s law binding them to their pledged vote. However, these violators often only face being charged with a misdemeanor or a small fine, usually $1,000. Many constitutional scholars agree that electors remain free agents despite state laws and that, if challenged, such laws would be ruled unconstitutional. Therefore, electors can decline to cast their vote for a specific candidate (the one that wins the popular vote of their state), either voting for an alternative candidate, or abstaining completely.”
Is it an overstatement to proclaim the following:
Do I know the risk involved in reporting on such things? Yes, I am fully aware of the Don Bolles assassination of a reporter case. Google the name. And then Google, the Phoenix 40, and you will see what people like me are up against. Why do you think the New York Times and the Washington Post are working to discredit Mike Adams and myself?
Even though there is no such thing as a Department of Justice, anymore, for all the good it will do, we should still report all instances of voter fraud