Profile image
By David Montaigne
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Pole Shift Cover-Up – In Japan This Time

Tuesday, May 15, 2018 5:10
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

In Pole Shift: Evidence Will Not Be Silenced – I review proof of previous pole shifts, and that evidence of past and upcoming pole shifts is being suppressed throughout the world.  But the story from Chiba (Japan) is new to me:

n-chibanian-a-20171115-870x606

ICHIHARA, Chiba (JAPAN) — “A final review of a geological stratum here called the “Chiba section,” which had been recognized internationally as representing a new geologic age, the “Chibaian,” has been bogged down since April… A team comprising researchers from Ibaraki University, the National Institute of Polar Research and other institutions filed a request to the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) in June 2017 that the Chiba section, which provides evidence of the last-known reversal of the Earth’s magnetic poles, be recognized as part of a new division of the Middle Pleistocene period… [Not that I agree this is the timing of the last or most recent pole shift]

95038_web

Two Italian locations also vied for the name of the age, but the IUGS working group in November 2017 declared the formation in Ichihara, Chiba Prefecture, the winner. If the IUGS had moved forward, the age would have been named the “Chibanian,” but problems arose.

According to sources close to the matter, a different research team forming the Council for Certification of Paleo-Kanto Great Depth Submarine Basin Geopark, based in Katori in the same prefecture, sent an email to the IUGS and the Italian researchers stating that the evidence of the last pole shift was actually data taken from a different stratum roughly 2 kilometers away and that the Chibanian data was fabricated….

The Chibanian team members assert that in 2015, before they applied for the age name, they had not been able to gather enough data from the Chiba section alone, so they had also used data from a stratum 2 kilometers away, but at the time of application, they had gathered enough data and used only data from the Chiba section when making their case to the IUGS.

There is absolutely no issue with the data, and the claim that it was fabricated is completely baseless,” said National Institute of Polar Research associate professor Yusuke Suganuma, a member of the research team. “They are just interfering with the review.”

Meanwhile, Paleo-Kanto council head Hisashi Nirei, an emeritus professor at Ibaraki University, told the Mainichi Shimbun, “I will not answer any questions, including whether or not we sent the emails.”

(Original by Yui Shuzo, Science & Environment News Department)

Knowing other pole shift evidence has been covered up, this gets my attention.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

.

 

We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

Loading...

Top Global

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.