Profile image
By Monetary Sovereignty blog
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Thank goodness you have someone to protect your children’s future

Thursday, March 16, 2017 13:47
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Twitter: @rodgermitchell; Search #monetarysovereignty
Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
It takes only two things to keep people in chains: The ignorance of the oppressed and the treachery of their leaders..
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Thank goodness you have someone to protect your future and your children’s future:

Trump’s Budget Slashes Climate Change Funding
March 16, Nell Greenfieldboyce

If there was any doubt over President Trump’s views on climate change, those doubts evaporated with the unveiling of his proposed federal budget on Thursday.

The budget would end programs to lower domestic greenhouse gas emissions, slash diplomatic efforts to slow climate change and cut scientific missions to study the climate.

“It’s terrible from the perspective of having any concern at all about climate change,” says  Andrew Light, a senior fellow at the World Resources Institute’s climate program and a professor at George Mason University.

They can cut the funding, but climate change is real and we’re going to have to deal with it,” says Chris McEntree, director of the American Geophysical Union.

Donald Trump knows more about climate change than do the climatologists. As he has told you on many occasions, climate change is a Chinese hoax.

The current warming and loss of plant and animal species is something that also happened millions of years ago. It may continue for millions more, and the earth could slowly evolve to a barren desert. So why try to fight global warming? It’s a natural event.

As you have been told, CO2 is not a real greenhouse gas, and the massive increase in CO2 is not warming the earth, so there is no reason for you, your children and your grandchildren to worry about controlling it

Many wealthy businesses and fossil-fuel companies are not worried. You can trust them. You are safe. Would President Trump lie to you?

Fortunately, you also are protected by the head of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Scott Pruitt, who also knows the environment does not need protection.

At the Environmental Protection Agency, the proposed budget “discontinues funding for the Clean Power Plan, international climate change programs, climate change research and partnership programs, and related efforts.”

The Clean Power Plan is the Obama administration’s plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from power plants — an effort that Pruitt has been highly critical of.

At the State Department, the budget proposal “eliminates the Global Climate Change Initiative and fulfills the President’s pledge to cease payments to the United Nations’ (UN) climate change programs by eliminating U.S. funding related to the Green Climate Fund.”

Pay no attention to those libtards at the Sierra Club, whose lawyers wrote to the EPA’s Office of Inspector General on Tuesday asking the independent watchdog to check whether Pruitt violated the EPA’s 2012 Scientific Integrity Policy when he told a CNBC interviewer on March 9, “I would not agree that it’s a primary contributor to the global warming that we see.”

If you click the link, you’ll see that the “Scientific Integrity Policy” is filled with a lot of blah, blah, blah nonsense about “honest investigation, peer review, scientific findings or conclusions.” You know, the usual meaningless, libtard stuff.

Anyway, you are smart enough to know you can trust President Trump, Scott Pruitt, and the oil companies a lot more that you can trust the climate scientists.

And if the above isn’t enough to convince you Trump knows what he is doing, and is not being influenced by big money, there’s this:

Trump Administration Proposes Big Cuts In Medical Research
Richard Harris and Rob Stein

Biomedical research and public health are among the big losers in the Trump administration’s proposed budget.

The proposal promises a “major reorganization” in the National Institutes of Health, which supports most of the nation’s research on diseases and treatments. That includes a cut of $5.8 billion, and “reform” of funding for the Centers for Disease and Prevention, which works to prevent, monitor and combat disease outbreaks.

Funding from the National Institutes of Health flows to more than 2,600 institutions around the country and creates more than 313,000 full- and part-time jobs. So it’s not obvious how slashing billions from the NIH budget, as the Trump administration proposes, will bring more jobs to America.

Puleeze. Picky, picky, picky. Who needs research into diseases and treatments? And the loss of a few thousand researcher’s jobs isn’t going to hurt us.

Anyway, if people would just take their vaccinations, they wouldn’t get sick.

Oh, what?

Trump’s vaccine-commission idea is biased and dangerous
Scientists must fight back with the truth about the debunked link between vaccines and autism.

Trump’s embrace of the tiresome and discredited anti-vaccination movement is no secret. He has tweeted and publicly discussed his concerns that childhood vaccines may be linked to autism. He has previously met with like-minded activists, including Andrew Wakefield, a father of the ‘anti-vaxxer’ crusade who has been barred from

He has tweeted and publicly discussed his concerns that childhood vaccines may be linked to autism. He has previously met with like-minded activists, including Andrew Wakefield, a father of the ‘anti-vaxxer’ crusade who has been barred from practicing medicine in the United Kingdom for professional misconduct.

Trump surely knows that there is already a federal commission to evaluate vaccine safety. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has an Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices that reports to the government on vaccine safety.

Vaccines are also regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration — and often have particularly stringent safety requirements because they are used in healthy children.

Uh, so O.K., no vaccination, but anyway, what’s the likelihood of anyone getting a serious disease? Pretty low. So why spent billions trying to prevent or cure serious diseases, especially if vaccinations cause autism.

Hey, who are you going to believe, Donald Trump, who founded an actual university, Trump University, or will you believe the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices?

You believe Trump, right? Sure you do.

You’re not stupid. You know you can trust Trump with your children’s futures, their lives, and their health. He’ll make America great again.

He never has lied to you before. 

Has he?

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Monetary Sovereignty

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

THE RULES

•Those, who do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.

•Any monetarily NON-sovereign government — be it city, county, state or nation — that runs an ongoing trade deficit, eventually will run out of money.

•The more federal budgets are cut and taxes increased, the weaker an economy becomes..

•No nation can tax itself into prosperity, nor grow without money growth.

•Cutting federal deficits to grow the economy is like applying leeches to cure anemia.

•A growing economy requires a growing supply of money (GDP = Federal Spending + Non-federal Spending + Net Exports)

•Deficit spending grows the supply of money

•The limit to federal deficit spending is an inflation that cannot be cured with interest rate control. The limit to non-federal deficit spending is the ability to borrow.

•Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.

•Progressives think the purpose of government is to protect the poor and powerless from the rich and powerful. Conservatives think the purpose of government is to protect the rich and powerful from the poor and powerless.

•The single most important problem in economics is the Gap between the rich and the rest.

•Austerity is the government’s method for widening the Gap between the rich and the rest.

•Until the 99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.

•Everything in economics devolves to motive, and the motive is the Gap between the rich and the rest..

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY



Source: https://mythfighter.com/2017/03/16/thank-goodness-you-have-someone-to-protect-your-childrens-future/

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.