Profile image
By Political Calculations (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

The S&P 500 in Week 2 of October 2016

Monday, October 17, 2016 2:24
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

From all appearances, investors have indeed shifted their forward-looking focus to the current quarter of 2016-Q4 in setting stock prices.

That’s a change from the previous week, where the trajectory of the S&P 500 suggested that might be the case, but which wasn’t as clear cut as we find the data indicates in Week 2 of October 2016.


As you can also see in the chart, during the next week, we’re going to once again have to cope with the echo effect that arises due to our standard model‘s use of historic stock prices as the base reference points from which we project the future and the occasional outsized volatility of those historic prices.

This time however, we’re going to keep the modified model that we developed ahead of the last such major echo event in our toolbox and will instead test the simplest method that we can think of for addressing the echo effect in our standard model’s projections. That method will simply involve connecting the dots for the trajectories associated with each future quarter to which investors might turn their attention on either side of the period where we know in advance that the accuracy of our standard model’s projections will be negatively affected by the echo effect.

For our alternative futures chart, that would mean adding four additional lines to connect the dots associated with each alternative trajectory that we display during the upcoming echo event, but we’re going to make a simplifying assumption (or prediction, if you like) so that we’ll only show one line. We’re going to assume that investors will remain focused on 2016-Q4 in setting stock prices for the next five weeks, so we only have to go to the trouble of connect the dots on either side of the echo for that single trajectory.


The shaded red region on the chart indicates the typical range of day-to-day volatility that we would expect stock prices to fall if investors do indeed focus their attention on 2016-Q4 in setting stock prices.

The reason we’re doing this is because it occurred to us that the modified model we developed produced results that would be little different from using this simpler approach. After the echo event has passed, we’ll compare what that method would have forecast with the simpler model and see if simpler is better.

In the meantime, here are the headlines from the week that was, which provide the basis for our simplifying assumption.

Monday, 10 October 2016
Tuesday, 11 October 2016
Wednesday, 12 October 2016
Thursday, 13 October 2016
Friday, 14 October 2016

Elsewhere, Barry Ritholtz summarizes the positives and negatives of the week’s economic and market news.


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question Razz Sad Evil Exclaim Smile Redface Biggrin Surprised Eek Confused Cool LOL Mad Twisted Rolleyes Wink Idea Arrow Neutral Cry Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global

Top Alternative



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.