Profile image
By Anonymous (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Parnassus above the Swamp

Sunday, February 12, 2017 15:23
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Amid the widespread vandalism in Washington over the last month – committed about equally by the White House and the Republican Congress – the carbon tax initiative propounded last week by a small group of centrist Republicans stands like Parnassus above a swamp.

George Shultz and James Baker III (secretaries of state to Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, respectively) billed their proposal as a “conservative” response to climate change, presumably because it calls for returning the proceeds of $40-per-ton carbon tax to citizens in the form of quarterly “dividends,” rather than turning over its enormous new revenues to the government to spend.

Sponsoring the measure would “be good for the long-term prospects of the Republican Party,” wrote Baker and Shultz in The Wall Street Journal.

It would be even better for the Democrats.

There are two broad approaches to reducing atmospheric pollution – the carbon tax, and the current regulatory approach. The former prices the carbon content of fossil fuels, at the well-head or the mine, and expects corporations to find efficient ways to reduce their energy bills. The latter sets emission quotas, and requires companies to purchase permits from the government, which they may then trade among themselves (“cap-and-trade.”)

Democrats are facing a stark choice in 2020.  They can hope that a suitable candidate appears out of the mists, and risk the kind of circular-firing-squad primaries that produced President Trump.  Call this the Lochinvar strategy

Or they can seek to persuade some centrist figure to accept a draft from the party, a fusion candidate who might govern from the center in the White House while both major parties reorient themselves. Call this the receivership approach.

Receivers usually are appointed; elected trustees are rare.  But receivership worked well for the Republican Party, and for the nation, in 1952. Fragmented after 20 years of Democratic rule, shocked by Harry Truman’s victory in 1948, GOP leaders offered the party’s nomination to Dwight David Eisenhower. As president of Columbia University and former World War II allied forces commander, Eisenhower had no strong party affiliation. He defeated Illinois Gov. Adlai Stevenson, twice, and served two mostly successful terms.

There’s even a plausible candidate at hand today: former CIA director Robert Gates, a thorough-going Midwesterner who served as Secretary of Defense in the administrations of George W. Bush and Barack Obama.  Gates would be 77 upon taking office, presumably a one-term president.  An Eagle Scout in his youth, he is currently president of the Boy Scouts of America.

Both major parties are deeply divided.  The White House after 2020 probably belongs to whichever succeeds in fashioning some strong appeal to the center. Polls show that climate change is the logical place to begin.

The Republican Party is dominated by climate-change skeptics; former Vice President Al Gore and major oil companies already prefer the carbon tax. It wouldn’t take much for an outsider among the Democrats to embrace the idea of revenue neutrality.



Source: http://www.economicprincipals.com/issues/2017.02.12/1970.html

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.