Profile image
By Mac Thornberry for Congress (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Thornberry, House continue regulatory reform effort

Thursday, January 12, 2017 10:02
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

U.S. Congressman Mac Thornberry (R-Clarendon) voted in support of the “Regulatory Accountability Act of 2017,” H.R. 5, which combines six previously passed or introduced House bills that will reform the federal regulatory system. The bill passed the House by a vote of 238-183.

“People are sick and tired of regulations that hurt jobs and our economy, and Congressional Republicans made repealing or correcting burdensome regulations the first item on our agenda. The provisions in this bill will make the regulatory process more transparent, federal agencies more accountable, and the regulations they produce less costly,” Thornberry said.

The legislation is the second major bill dealing with regulations to pass the House in the 115th Congress, and Thornberry said the House will continue to focus on this issue as the year progresses. As a part of that effort, he has sent a letter to local Chambers of Commerce asking them to gather information on the most burdensome regulations their businesses face.

“Business owners understand better than anyone how harmful some of these regulations can be because they are the people who have to comply with them. Their feedback will help me and others in Congress direct our efforts where they will make the most difference,” said Thornberry.

H.R. 5 includes the following provisions:

Title I – “Regulatory Accountability Act,” which requires agencies to choose the lowest-cost rulemaking alternative that meets objectives and requires greater opportunity for public input and vetting of critical information;

Title II – “Separation of Powers Restoration Act,” which would rein in the Executive Branch by scaling back Chevron-based deference to federal agencies, by requiring de novo review of agency actions for all relevant questions of law, including Constitutional and statutory interpretation. It would place judicial review back in the hands of the Judiciary, and make clear the lines between judicial interpretation of law and executive enforcement of the law;

Title III – “Small Business Regulatory Flexibility Improvements Act,” which would expand the Regulatory Flexibility Act requiring regulatory agencies to account for the effect on small businesses in their rulemaking. It would require agencies to include the indirect effects of regulations on small businesses, not just the direct impact. It would also require agencies to have a small business advocacy panel to review major regulations;

Title IV – “REVIEW Act,” which would prohibit new billion-dollar rules from taking effect until courts can resolve timely-filed litigation challenging their promulgation;

Title V – “ALERT Act,” which would require agencies to provide detailed disclosures on regulations; and

Title VI – “Providing Accountability Through Transparency Act,” which would require each agency to include a 100-word, plain-language summary of a proposed rule when providing notice of a rulemaking.


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global

Top Alternative




Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.