Profile image
By Mort Amsel (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Olympic Verdict Places British Residents Under Military Rule Indefinitely

Saturday, July 28, 2012 6:23
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.



It’s official: an Englishman’s home is no longer his castle.

In a move that is hardly witnessed in wartime, let alone in peacetime, the UK’s military establishment has been given the green light to quarter residential homes without any permission or notice.

In the run-up to the 2012 Olympics in London, the UK’s Ministry of Defence (MOD) has taken the unprecedented step of erecting surface-to-air missile batteries on top of multiple residential locations around East London.

A group of local council tenants from Leytonstone, East London, lost their high court battle to prevent the military missile encampment from being stationed on the roof of their tower block before and during the Olympics. The action to use their residential block as a military base was signed off by the British Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister, Home Secretary and Defence Secretary in ‘Defence of the Realm’.

Residents were then also refused permission and blocked from applying for an appeal via judicial review because the case falls under the guise of national security.

The Defence Secretary, Philip Hammond, was accused by the residents of the block of Breaching Article 8 and Article 1 of Protocol 1 of the European convention on Human Rights. These protect an individual’s right to a private life and peaceful enjoyment of their home.

At no point beforehand were any of the residents given consultation by the MOD. Moreover, the ruling against the residents has set a number of new legal precedents in favour of the military, including a ‘zero notice’ policy whereby the MOD has no obligation to inform or consult residents beforehand, nor do they have any legal obligation to offer any compensation if they choose to commandeer a private property to set-up a forward operating base.

David Enright, a human rights lawyer and Partner of Howe and Co. who represented the residents, explains the danger of this new ruling, “Let’s be clear. Whenever the government (or military) takes a power over the civilian population – they never give it back.”

Read more here:

We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 2 comments
  • twisted truth

    they have to look like they are trying to stop whats coming or people there might wake up to.

  • Pix

    You can’t wipe out natural law. They’ve tried many times telling us we don’t have a constitution but we do and have since the Magna Carter. In the Magna Carter is a law called ‘legal rebbelion’, and there is not a single thing the Fabian society can do about it.

    The Fabian society via Tony Blair want to break up and destroy national government control to impliment their UN world dictatorship. They inflitrated politics way back and tried to impliment the ‘parliament act’ that takes away final perogative of the current monarch on legislation, but it was rejected by the house of lords, they put it to public vote and it was rejected by the population, but they have ignored that and gone ahead with it. Which means every bit of legislation via the UN or EEC they impliment is an act of treason because it is giving away authority to a foriegn power.

    We’ll have them hanging from the tower yet. ;)

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global


Top Alternative




Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.