Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By Quantum Blog (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Closing the gap, part 2

Tuesday, October 25, 2016 6:24
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

I felt the need to verify the calculations in the previous post, just to be sure no coding error was made, or at least not a serious one. To do this, I've rewritten the strategy using vector operations rather than 'for' loops and I'm happy to say, the result still stands. Sharpe is a little lower at 1.13, but the curves are quite similar.
B4INREMOTE-aHR0cDovLzIuYnAuYmxvZ3Nwb3QuY29tL19qNnV0clZjckw5ay9UVTZDd2JfZmNfSS9BQUFBQUFBQURDMC85eXpXOWdKRjRzYy9zMzIwL3BubDIucG5n

To make this post a worthy follow up, I've also included the code:
dumbGaps.m , download_hist_yahoo_data.m

The following remarks are still very appropriate:

  • It is very hard to get a fill at the opening price.
  • Results are frictionless.
  • All this is just a basic concept

Your feedback is very much appreciated.

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.