Profile image
By Static Chaos (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Judge Who Overturned Drilling Ban Held Oil Stocks Back in 2008, So What??

Tuesday, June 22, 2010 21:46
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Headline: Bitcoin & Blockchain Searches Exceed Trump! Blockchain Stocks Are Next!

By Static Chaos

The ink of the ruling against the offshore drilling moratorium is not even dry yet, the media is already jumping all over that Judge Martin Feldman is “greased with oil investments“, says Mr. Christopher Helman, an Associate Editor of Forbes.

A “blog” at Forbes penned by Helman cited the NewsWatch Energy blog at Houston Chronicle that

“Judge Martin Feldman…..has owned stock in more than a dozen oil and gas companies, including two involved in the Deepwater Horizon disaster: Transocean and Halliburton. Feldman’s 2008 financial disclosure report shows investments in gulf players Hercules Offshore, ATP Oil & Gas, Rowan Companies and Parker Drilling.”

However, Helman forgot or chose to omit one pretty important paragraph from the same Houston Chronicle post:

“Some of those stocks were sold during the reporting period.”

Furthermore, according to the “Update” section by Mr. Tom Fowler, author of the same post at Houston Chronicle:

“Some environmental groups are already releasing statements noting what appears to be a conflict of interest on the part of Judge Feldman…. However, a lawyer with non-profit public interest law firm Earthjustice told the Chronicle..that the organization did not ask for a recusal, nor did the issue ever come up.”

So, in layman’s term –NO, there’s no evidence that Feldman still had those said stocks at the end of 2008, nor that he still holds them during the period of the moratorium hearing.  And…YES, the environmental groups would love nothing more than to see Feldman recused on conflict, but were unable to raise it as a cause.  

This renders the Forbes “blog” pretty much irrelevant in what appears to be an attempt linking conflict of interest to a federal judge, who happened to have ruled against the drilling moratorium on legal and constitutional ground. 

In any case, even if this allegation were legit, it would have paled in comparison to the blatant conflict of interest by Matt Simmons’ TV sensationalism. 

Well, this is just one example of the sad but real picture of what has become of today’s headline-chasing media and the so-called journalism.

Or could it be that since more and more reporters are becoming “bloggers” to drive web traffic, but still with the legal protection from their major media employers, this is a conspiracy to discredit the real blogosphere, who’s driving them out of business?  Just one theory….  

By Static Chaos    
 

Read the original story at Static Chaos

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.