Profile image
By Competitive Enterprise Institute (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

CEI-Led Coalition Opposes Regulator Price Controls on Freight Railroads

Thursday, October 27, 2016 8:33
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Today, a coalition of free market groups led by the Competitive Enterprise Institute sent a letter to congressional leaders opposing an effort by regulators to impose new mandates and price controls on freight railroad carriers, a vital industry in the U.S. The letter, signed by 13 national and state policy groups, urges Congress to take a hard look at the Surface Transportation Board’s conduct and prevent a proposed rule change.

“Decades after freight rail was deregulated in the United States and the industry has proven its tremendous benefit to our nation’s economy, the federal Surface Transportation Board wants to take a big step towards re-regulation,” said Marc Scribner, CEI transportation policy expert.

“The STB seeks to force reciprocal switching arrangements between railroads, a move that represents a dangerous re-regulatory action that Congress must again reject,” Scribner explained. “The STB’s suggestion that a three-decade absence of anticompetitive conduct has rendered the anticompetitive conduct requirement obsolete makes no sense. In fact, STB’s troubling proposal suggests that it may be the STB itself that is obsolete.”

The STB is considering changing the rules on reciprocal switching, requiring Class 1 rail carriers, railroads that are the largest by revenue, to handle the cars of competing carriers at an artificially low rate.

In an effort to force more of these access arrangements, the STB would eliminate a 30-year-old requirement that evidence of anticompetitive behavior be found before regulators step in. That standard was upheld by the courts three decades ago and to date there has not been any finding of anticompetitive conduct on the part of rail carriers. But now, the STB in essence argues it must rewrite the law to find guilt where none exists.

CEI has also argued in public comments submitted to the STB that the Board cannot lawfully eliminate the anticompetitive conduct requirement, as Congress has consistently and repeatedly acquiesced to the standard for decades in the face of numerous failed attempts to eliminate the requirement through legislation. 

Thursday, October 27, 2016
Publication Type: 


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global


Top Alternative




Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.