Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By Competitive Enterprise Institute (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

CFPB “Structurally Unconstitutional” – US Court of Appeals

Wednesday, October 12, 2016 8:25
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

In a rare victory for the Constitution and American political tradition, the US Court of Appeals from the DC Circuit today found that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was “structurally unconstitutional.” The offending structure consists of an independent agency with a single, all-powerful executive director. The Court found that structure fell between two stools – an agency with a single head needs to be accountable to the President, while an independent agency needs to have internal checks and balances by having a multi-member commission format like the SEC and others.

This judgment echoes the arguments the Competitive Enterprise Institute and its co-plaintiffs have been making in a separate court case, where my colleague Hans Bader argued, “The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s lack of checks and balances violates the Constitution’s separation of powers. Its director is like a czar. He is not accountable to anyone, and can’t be fired even if voters elect a president with different ideas about how to protect consumers.”

The Court has now made the director, Richard Cordray, accountable, which means that the President must direct and control the CFPB and its director. He has a lot to do to rein in this rogue agency, as the findings in the rest of the case indicate – the Bureau not only overstepped its powers, it breached due process, and ignored the statute of limitations, in its action against PHH. Whether or not this President will actually take action is, of course, a bit of a moot point.

But Congress also has a role to play. If it wants the CFPB to be independent, it needs to restructure the Bureau in accordance with the Court’s suggestion as a traditional, multi-member commission. It was always the intention of the Bureau’s proponents, including Senator Elizabeth Warren, that the Bureau be independent of political pressure.

If Congress wishes to support that goal of independence, it should pass a bill quickly to allow that to happen. In fact, there is just such a bill – Rep. Randy Neugebauer’s Financial Product Safety Commission Act, introduced last year. If Senator Warren really wants an independent CFPB, she should support it. Such a reform is also included in the Financial CHOICE Act, but that may be too bitter a pill for Dodd-Frank supporters to swallow.

Nevertheless, this is a huge victory for the Constitution and, at last, a repudiation of unaccountable executive power.

Originally posted to National Review

Tuesday, October 11, 2016
Iain Murray
Publication Type: 

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.