Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By FIRE-Foundation for Individual Rights In Education
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Newseum Panelists Debate Status, Future of First Amendment

Monday, October 24, 2016 9:49
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

“Do we as a nation still have the same commitment to freedom of speech that America’s founders envisioned?”

That was among the questions debated last week at the Newseum’s Free Speech Week panel discussion, “Free Speech: Still the ‘American Way’?” The Newseum has now posted video of last Thursday’s event to its YouTube channel, so you can check out the entire enlightening conversation for yourself.

Jeffrey Herbst, CEO of the Newseum and Newseum Institute, moderated the discussion on the current state of the First Amendment in American society, whether the First Amendment goes too far in protecting offensive or even deceptive speech, and what, if anything, should be done about it.

Panelists included Robert Corn-Revere, a First Amendment attorney who has worked extensively with FIRE; Rodney Smolla, a First Amendment scholar and dean of Widener University’s Delaware Law School; John Watson, a lawyer, journalist and American University professor; and John M. Seigenthaler, former NBC, MSNBC and Al Jazeera America news anchor.

Despite the speakers’ shared First Amendment expertise, each brought a distinct point of view to the discussion. For example, Herbst asked the panelists to begin by discussing the greatest current threat to the First Amendment. Seigenthaler said the current contentious political climate posed threats to the free press.

“Those challenges are real,” he said. “And they’re very frightening.”

Watson cited basic human nature itself as a constant stumbling block to preserving speech we dislike.

“Freedom actually means jointly deciding where that freedom ends,” Watson said, adding that respecting speech one disagrees with means that, on some level, “I have to devalue my own.”

Smolla and Corn-Revere both discussed free speech on college campuses, with Corn-Revere identifying “three essential preconditions for strong protections for free expression as we move further into the 21st century: … First, the rule of law. Second, the courage of our convictions. And third, an appreciation for the spirit of liberty.”

He noted that college campuses are a great place to look to see if those preconditions are being met. 

For example, on the question of whether we still maintain the courage of our convictions, Corn-Revere observed:

The framers of the constitution were not timid people, and they knew that a necessary condition for going forward and for protecting free expression is courage. … The question will come up on whether or not an interest in trigger warnings, safe [spaces], heightened sensitivities, microaggressions are conditions that you would call courageous.

And all of that discussion stemmed from just the first question!

Watch for yourself to see the panelists debate the challenges posed by the rise of anonymous Internet speech, whether concerns about free speech are overblown, and much, much more.

The post Newseum Panelists Debate Status, Future of First Amendment appeared first on FIRE.

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.