Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By Reason Magazine (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

There You Are

Saturday, October 1, 2016 9:17
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

American citizens should have no expectations of privacy when it comes to location data transmitted by their smartphones.

So the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals determined in a 12–3 decision at the end of May. The question was whether police can obtain information about where cellphone users are at any given time without getting a warrant. The case revolved around the use of cellphone location data provided by Sprint to track two customers accused of armed robberies in Baltimore.

Under the “third-party doctrine” established by Supreme Court precedents in the 1970s, private data held by third parties—such as phone records—are not subject to the same Fourth Amendment warrant requirements as the records or potential evidence people keep in their own possession. When those precedents were set, phone records merely indicated what number a person called and how long he or she talked. Now they can reveal where people physically are at any given moment.

This was one of several cases attempting to challenge whether the third-party doctrine should still apply in the digital era. Thus far, every court has reaffirmed its status, and it’s unclear whether the Supreme Court might reconsider the rule anytime soon.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.