Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By Militant Libertarian (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

America’s Ironic “Two-Faced” War on Terror

Tuesday, November 8, 2016 8:02
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

And eventually, that is precisely what was done. MEK would be delisted by the US State Department in 2012, announced in a US State Department statement titled, “Delisting of the Mujahedin-e Khalq,” which noted:

With today’s actions, the Department does not overlook or forget the MEK’s past acts of terrorism, including its involvement in the killing of U.S. citizens in Iran in the 1970s and an attack on U.S. soil in 1992. 

The Department also has serious concerns about the MEK as an organization, particularly with regard to allegations of abuse committed against its own members. The Secretary’s decision today took into account the MEK’s public renunciation of violence, the absence of confirmed acts of terrorism by the MEK for more than a decade, and their cooperation in the peaceful closure of Camp Ashraf, their historic paramilitary base.

MEK’s inability to conduct violence in the decade preceding the US State Department’s decision was not because of an ideological commitment to nonviolence, but a matter of strategic limitations placed on the terrorist organisation by Iraqi and Iranian security forces who were determined to liquidate it and who forcibly disarmed the group.

epa03110222 A man stands beside bangalos, in the former U.S military base which will be the new temporary camp for the Iranian opposition group Mujahideen-e-Khalq (MEK) refugees, near Baghdad's international Airport, Iraq, 17 February 2012. The first group of Iranian exile group will leave Camp Ashraf in Diyala province, northeast of Baghdad to a former US military base outside Baghdad. Camp Liberty which will be the new temporary camp before of the resettlle of the group outside of Iraq under a plan agreed with the United Nations. EPA/ALI ABBAS

epa03110222 A man stands beside bangalos, in the former U.S military base which will be the new temporary camp for the Iranian opposition group Mujahideen-e-Khalq (MEK) refugees, near Baghdad’s international Airport, Iraq, 17 February 2012. The first group of Iranian exile group will leave Camp Ashraf in Diyala province, northeast of Baghdad to a former US military base outside Baghdad. Camp Liberty which will be the new temporary camp before of the resettlle of the group outside of Iraq under a plan agreed with the United Nations. EPA/ALI ABBAS

(Members of the MEK terrorist organisation in Camp Ashraf, Iraq)
And even if the 2012 US State Department decision was based on an alleged decade of nonviolence, the policymakers at the Brookings Institution who signed their names to “Which Path to Persia?” including Daniel Byman, certainly did not apply the same criteria in suggesting its use as an armed proxy.

In all likelihood, had Iraq and Iran not successfully cornered and disarmed the group, it would be fighting America’s proxy war against Tehran on both sides of the Iran-Iraq border. MEK fighters would be carrying out US-backed armed violence against Iran and Iraq side-by-side other US-backed terrorist groups operating across the region as part of America’s current proxy war against Syria, Russia and Iran.

Daniel Byman of the Brookings Institution’s latest paper even at face value is disingenuous, full of intentional mischaracterisations meant to direct attention away from the US and its closest allies’ own sponsorship of terrorism amid a very much feigned “War on Terror.” Understanding that Byman quite literally signed his name to a policy paper promoting the arming and backing of a US State Department designated foreign terrorist organisation makes his recent paper all that more outrageous.

What is also as troubling as it is ironic, is that Byman not only signed his name to calls for arming a listed terrorist organisation, he was also a staff member of the 9/11 Commission, according to his Georgetown University biography. A man involved in sorting out a terrorist attack who is also advocating closer cooperation with listed terrorist organisations is truly disturbing.

The political and ethical bankruptcy of American foreign policy can be traced back to its policy establishment, populated by unprincipled hypocrites like Byman and co-signatories of Brookings’ “Which Path to Persia?” The US certainly cannot convince other nations to abandon an alleged “two-faced” policy of promoting and fighting terrorism simultaneously when it stands as a global leader in this very practise.

Joseph Thomas is chief editor of Thailand-based geopolitical journal, The New Atlas and contributor to the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.

Article source: http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2016/10/americas-ironic-two-faced-war-on-terror.html

Share

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.