Profile image
By Reason Magazine (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Are Selfies of Absentee Ballots Illegal? Hope Not, Because Here’s Mine For Gary Johnson

Tuesday, November 1, 2016 14:25
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Remember how Justin Timberlake’s early-voting “ballot selfie” nearly destroyed the American Experiment last week? We got lucky, didn’t we?

In an hour or so, I’ll be debating economist Walter Block in Manhattan on the subject of whether libertarians should vote for Donald Trump. Block created a group called Libertarians for Trump, which urges believers in “Free Minds and Free Markets” to do just that. Among the main reasons that Block—unconvincingly to my mind—wants Trump to win is that he believes Hillary Clinton will kill us all.

No[t] only are two and maybe three Supreme Court nominations likely to be in play in the next four years, but more important, far more important, a second President Clinton (gulp, I can barely make myself write those words) is likely to usher in World War III, with nuclear not atomic bombs, this time.

There’s no question that Hillary Clinton has what Thaddeus Russell has rightly called a “dangerously coherent foreign policy,” by which he means that she’s “never seen an opportunity for American military intervention she didn’t like.” But is she actually “likely” to create a global conflict that ends like Dr. Strangelove? I’d argue no more than Donald Trump, whose foreign policy statements are bombastic and generally incoherent. He is less hostile to Russia than Clinton seems to be but makes up in his stances toward China and Islamists in the Middle East, whom he alternately wants to bomb the shit out of and kill their wives and children.

Neither major-party candidate has a foreign policy that sits well with libertarian principles of military intervention as a last resort and one only fully justified when used as a true defensive measure. Not surprisingly, the Libertarian Party candidate, Gary Johnson has articulated a foreign policy that is based on skepticism toward the use of military power and focused more on commerce, trade, and diplomacy. As part of Reason’s quadrennial presidential-election survey, I’ve already announced my intention to vote for Johnson and, given tonight’s activities, I figured I’d just up and fill out my absentee ballot on the way to the debate and reveal it dramatically at some point during the proceedings.

So here it is, in the flesh (?), folks, for any of you who can’t make tonight’s debate.


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global


Top Alternative




Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.