Profile image
By Cato Institute-Recent Op-Eds
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Distribute Medicare’s Budget in Cash So Recipients Can Choose Care

Wednesday, November 30, 2016 7:50
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Michael F. Cannon

Medicare is growing unsustainably. It is devouring an ever-larger share of Americans’ paychecks, and piling more and more debt on our children and grandchildren. At the same time, researchers find Medicare is a major contributor to uncoordinated care, medical errors and other problems.

How can Congress make health care better, more affordable, and more secure for Medicare enrollees and everyone else? Instead of mismanaging a $600 billion health-insurance scheme for 60 million elderly and disabled Americans, or giving seniors vouchers to choose from among different versions of a government-designed health plan, Congress should simply distribute Medicare’s budget to enrollees as cash. Just like Social Security.

Turning it into a cash transfer would end nearly every rule put in by special interests to preserve outdated business models and stifle innovation.

Turning Medicare into a cash-transfer program would eliminate nearly every Medicare rule put in place by special interests to preserve their outdated business models and stifle innovation. It would spark an innovation revolution in health insurance and health care delivery.

Enrollees could select health plans that meet their needs, instead of the needs of politicians and lobbyists. They could choose innovative plans that provide the coordinated care, information technologies, effectiveness research and safer medicine Medicare has promised but failed to deliver.

Enrollees would avoid wasteful medical care because they would get to keep the savings. Sixty million newly cost-conscious consumers would put so much downward pressure on prices, health care for seniors and everyone else would become more affordable. Congress could finally curb Medicare spending, and do it without hysterics about government rationing and “death panels.”

Medicare enrollees would have nothing to fear from insurers charging actuarially fair premiums, because the size of their check would depend on their health status and income, so lower-income and sicker enrollees would get bigger “Medicare checks” than healthy and wealthy enrollees. The fact that research suggests one third of Medicare spending does nothing to make enrollees happier or healthier means Medicare’s $600 billion budget includes a huge buffer that will protect enrollees from both faulty risk-adjustment and their own mistakes.

House Speaker Paul Ryan and President-elect Donald J. Trump’s choice for health and human services secretary, Rep. Tom Price of Georgia have proposed a “premium support” model that would give enrollees a voucher they could use to choose from different versions of a government-designed health plan. Premium support would be a step in the right direction. But it would not drive down health care prices the way a cash-transfer program can, and the improvements it offers would come too late for most seniors.

Congress should not voucher-ize Medicare. It should Social Securit-ize Medicare.

Michael F. Cannon is the director of health policy studies at the Cato Institute and co-editor of Replacing ObamaCare.


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global

Top Alternative



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.