Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By FIRE-Foundation for Individual Rights In Education
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Dual-Purpose TPUSA ‘Watchlist’ Warrants Two-Toned Response

Tuesday, November 22, 2016 14:03
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Yesterday, conservative group Turning Point USA (TPUSA) launched a website, Professor Watchlist, “to expose and document college professors who discriminate against conservative students, promote anti-American values, and advance leftist propaganda in the classroom.” Visitors, the website states, may use the Watchlist to “see if any of [their] professors have records of opposing freedom of speech on campus.” They may also submit new names to the list.

professor watchlist tpusa embed

Some free speech advocates and professors whose names are on the list have voiced concerns about the website. FIRE will be watching closely for adverse action against the professors. We want to make two things clear at the outset: First, TPUSA does have the right to draw up such a list, but, second, professors who may be facing discipline or punishment due to their constitutionally protected speech should contact FIRE right away.

TPUSA’s Watchlist appears to have multiple goals, including promoting free expression and pushing back against “leftist” views. The former is, of course, consistent with FIRE’s mission; the latter is outside the scope of FIRE’s work. We encourage any student who is censored or punished by campus authorities because of his or her beliefs—conservative, liberal, or otherwise—to submit a case to FIRE. To the extent that any group encourages students to fight back against viewpoint-based censorship and punishment, we commend it.

While a public college or university cannot punish a professor simply for his or her viewpoints, groups like TPUSA are free to publicize professors’ stances with which they disagree and to promote their own opinions about those professors. FIRE does not take positions on issues outside our mission, but we stand ready to defend the expressive rights of other parties who wish to discuss any subject. (We make an exception and step into the conversation when speakers opine on the topic of free expression itself, due process, or other topics within FIRE’s mission.)

Because the Watchlist specifies reasons for professors’ inclusion on the list, website users can decide for themselves whether TPUSA is objecting to a professor for his or her suppression of speech or whether TPUSA simply disagrees with the professor’s viewpoints. Users can also conduct their own fact-checking; as Inside Higher Ed reported today, some entries on the list “include alleged errors of fact or interpretation.” Listees are already speaking out in their own defense, and the public conversations about each professor’s circumstances are likely to be ongoing. Critics of the list are even taking to Twitter with the hashtag #trollprofwatchlist, naming names like Dr. John Hammond of Jurassic Park and Gilderoy Lockhart of Harry Potter’s Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry.

Free speech advocates are right to be on the lookout. Historically, creating a list of disfavored viewpoints or of people who hold them has often been a first step towards official sanction. The American Association of University Professors also expressed concern about the Watchlist; in a 1985 statement regarding a similar effort, it said that such “[e]xternal monitoring of in-class statements” is “likely to have a chilling effect and result in self-censorship.” FIRE hopes neither of these results come to pass, but if any college or university takes action or attempts to restrict expression based on the Watchlist—or any similar list—we will employ all of the resources at our disposal in response. (Indeed, FIRE has already taken action to defend the free speech rights of a few of the individuals on the Watchlist, such as University of Kansas professor David Guth.)

FIRE took the same position back in 2008 in response to the National Association of Scholars’ “Argus Project,” which, like the Watchlist, had multiple goals. As FIRE’s Robert Shibley wrote:

To be clear: If NAS’ project encourages universities to punish professors for their opinions, FIRE will oppose it in those cases, as we would anyone else with a similar agenda. If, however, the project serves merely to criticize professors for their scholarship, while that would certainly not be a FIRE issue, it is NAS’ right to do so.

If you are a student or professor who has been punished or censored because of your viewpoint, contact FIRE. If you disagree with the views espoused by your professors, by TPUSA, or by any other person or group, speak up and make your voice heard.

The post Dual-Purpose TPUSA ‘Watchlist’ Warrants Two-Toned Response appeared first on FIRE.

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.