Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By Schansblog (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

on “trickle-down”, Trump, Clinton and Reagan

Monday, November 14, 2016 8:44
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

a.) “Trickle-down” again? C'mon people. Will the same people be ok if we switch to labels such as “anti-science” or “pro-abortion” on Roe v. Wade?

b.) Comparing Clinton's job growth with Reagan's? Puh-leez. 1.) Clinton had the generally-healthy economy that Reagan bequeathed him and a slight recession at the end of the Bush years from which to recover. Reagan/Volcker had the high inflation of Johnson-Nixon-Carter monetary policy to deal with (leading to the recession in 1982– a time that was worse than the Great Recession).
2.) Clinton benefited from Reagan winning the Cold War, allowing him to divert military/defense resources to more productive uses.

c.) But to argue in favor of the author's thesis: One would not expect the necessarily-small decreases in marginal tax rates to be all that consequential– or helpful to tax revenues or to the economy. When JFK (the original “supply-sider”) cut the top rate from 91 to 70%– and when Reagan teamed with a Democratic House to cut the top rate to 28% (and index taxes for inflation– a huge, vastly-under-rated policy change)– the gains were (expected to be) much larger.


Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.