Profile image
By Competitive Enterprise Institute (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

CEI Joins Open Letter Urging Utah Legislature to Reject S.B. 110’s Unconstitutional Tax Grab

Wednesday, March 1, 2017 15:39
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

View full document as PDF

Dear Utah Legislator,

On behalf of the millions of members of the undersigned organizations, including thousands of Utah residents and taxpayers, we write in strong opposition to S.B. 110, a bill that, if approved, would lead to disastrous results for Utah. This legislation is both unconstitutional and foolhardy, and you would be wise to reject it.

This bill and similar approaches to interstate sales taxes hold an ignominious distinction: they are the only such efforts in recent memory intentionally drafted so as to be unconstitutional and draw a lawsuit. By empowering Utah to collect taxes from businesses with no physical presence within your borders, the rule immediately draws Utah into a potentially expensive and contentious cycle of litigation one witnesses in other states. This is a cycle unlikely to yield positive results, since decades-old Supreme Court precedent makes clear that state tax powers end at the border’s edge.

Setting aside the bill’s obvious unconstitutionality, it unnecessarily jeopardizes Utahn’s fiscal health. By contributing to the erosion of borders as effective limits on state tax power, it will encourage poorly-governed, tax-heavy states like California, New York and Illinois to unleash predatory tax collectors on Utah businesses. Your constituents will now face audit and enforcement actions in states across the country in which they have no physical presence.

Furthermore, a system of sales tax enforcement unbounded by tangible connections—like a physical presence—imposes significant compliance costs on web-enabled businesses. This burden falls particularly hard on specialty businesses and small sellers dependent on the internet to reach customers. These “mom and pop” stores will be forced to keep track of all 10,000 taxing jurisdictions across the country, each with its own rates, rules and regulations, while sales in similar brick-and-mortar businesses only require collection of tax for the single jurisdiction in which they’re located.

Our Constitution was written to replace the Articles of Confederation in no small part due to the latter’s failure to prevent a spiraling interior “war” of states brought about by conflicting tax and regulatory assertions outside their borders. While the Constitution’s Commerce Clause and subsequent jurisprudence make clear that taxing power must be limited by state borders, S.B. 110 seeks to efface these limits. You are embarking on a dangerous, preventable course of action. Now is the time for you and your fellow legislators act to stop it.


Andrew Moylan, R Street Institute

Norm Singleton, Campaign for Liberty                                  

Jeffrey L. Mazzella, Center for Individual Freedom

Jessica Melugin, Competitive Enterprise Institute                                           

Wayne T. Brough, FreedomWorks

Pete Sepp, National Taxpayers Union

David Williams, Taxpayers Protection Alliance

Judson Phillips, Tea Party Nation

Wednesday, March 1, 2017
Publication Type: 


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global

Top Alternative




Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.