Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By Cafe Hayek (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Navarro vs. Griswold

Wednesday, March 8, 2017 12:01
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

(Don Boudreaux)

Tweet

Trump trade advisor Peter Navarro is to economic science what a faith-healer is to medical science: each spews patent nonsense that uninformed people who dislike reality can interpret to be truth.

Navarro recently quoted from a paper on trade deficits written a few years ago by my Mercatus Center colleague Dan Griswold.  Dan’s paper is meant to calm the baseless hysteria over trade deficits, and so Navarro’s aim was to discredit Dan’s paper.  Here’s Dan’s response to Navarro’s fallacies.  A slice from Dan’s response:

Navarro’s theory about the U.S. trade deficit is contradicted by recent U.S. economic history. If Navarro is correct, how does he explain the performance of the U.S. economy in the 1990s, when rising trade deficits were accompanied by strong economic growth, a robust increase in industrial output, and full employment? That period was also a time of falling trade barriers abroad, with the implementation of NAFTA and the Uruguay Round Agreements.



Source: http://cafehayek.com/2017/03/navarro-vs-griswold.html

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.