Profile image
By Cafe Hayek (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

What About Losers from Tariffs?

Monday, March 6, 2017 5:16
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Don Boudreaux)


Here’s a letter to a Cafe Hayek reader:

Mr. Tony Tran

Mr. Tran:

Thanks for your e-mail in which you ask if “free-traders have better arguments [for free trade] than [that] everyone will be richer in the long run.”  You continue: “People want protection against certain losses now. Today’s losers from trade are not comforted by the future gains trade might possibly bring.”

I don’t doubt that many people are too willing to ignore, or to discount too heavily, trade’s future benefits.  But it’s a mistake to suppose that trade is unique in obliging some workers at any particular time – and all workers over a long-enough span of time – to adjust to changes in the ways that consumers spend their money.  If the unemployment that steelworker Jones will suffer today because of more trade is a sufficient reason for government to restrict trade, then so too is the unemployment that baker Smith will suffer today because of more dieting a sufficient reason for government to restrict dieting.

There’s yet another reason why your argument fails.  The same tariff that protects American steelworker Jones from “losing” today from trade also inflicts losses on both American consumer Williams and on American worker Adams.  The tariff obliges Williams to pay higher prices for goods whose domestic suppliers are now protected from foreign competition and, thus, results in Williams consuming or saving less than she would without the tariff.  The tariff makes Williams poorer.

The tariff also destroys Adams’s job.  Perhaps Adams works in a slaughterhouse in Nebraska that produces beef for export.  With foreigners now, because of the tariff, earning fewer dollars, foreigners buy fewer American exports.  Or perhaps Adams works in a Ford factory in Michigan.  With the price of steel now made higher by the tariff, Ford produces fewer new cars.  Or maybe Adams manages a clothing store in Miami.  Because the tariff obliges consumers to pay higher prices for goods made with steel (and with steel substitutes), consumers have less money to spend on new clothing.

The bottom line is that tariffs that protect some people from being “losers” from trade necessarily cause other people to be losers from tariffs.  It is simply an error to suppose that tariffs are a means of reducing the number of people who today suffer economic losses.

Donald J. Boudreaux
Professor of Economics
Martha and Nelson Getchell Chair for the Study of Free Market Capitalism at the Mercatus Center
George Mason University
Fairfax, VA  22030


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global


Top Alternative




Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.