Profile image
By Reason Magazine (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Los Angeles Schools Facing $15 Billion Debt for Retiree Health Care

Monday, April 16, 2018 6:09
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

A forthcoming report on the Los Angeles Unified School District’s retirement costs will show that the district has nearly $15 billion in unfunded health care costs for current employees and retirees.

The district’s so-called OPEB liability—that’s actuarial jargon for “other post-employment benefits,” which includes the cost of medical, dental, and other health care benefits that fall outside the traditional pension system—has climbed from $13.5 billion in 2015 to $14.9 billion in 2017, according to the report, a copy of which was obtained by Reason. It has not yet been released publicly by the district. A spokeswoman for Aon Hewitt, the accounting firm that completed the assessment on the school district’s behalf, confirmed the report’s legitimacy.

The increase in the district’s unfunded liability is driven by an adjustment in accounting standards that prohibits school districts and other public employers from using artificially high estimates for future investment returns, a strategy that in the past has allowed governments to hide some of their retirement liabilities. Under the new rules, future returns will be estimated at 3.6 percent, rather than the previous rate of 4.7 percent.

This change in accounting standards is expected to affect pension systems from coast to coast, leaving a more realistic (but also more expensive) picture of what taxpayers and governments will owe to current public employees when they retire. The change will also require public entities to show their OPEB liabilities on official balance sheets, something that few governments previously did.

In other words, the LAUSD is running out of ways to hide its public employee debt—and is running out of money to pay for it.

Because school districts in California receive state aid based on the number of students enrolled in district schools, the LAUSD’s declining enrollment means there is less state funding to cover those future costs. The district has done a poor job of setting aside funds to keep its OPEB accounts full—the school district has only $244 million in assets to cover more than $15.2 billion in liabilities, the report shows—and a pay-as-you-go strategy works only as long as future cash flows can keep up. Public employees will continue to accrue benefits until they die, but declining enrollment exposes the district’s fiscal problem.

While there are a variety of rules governing when school district employees can retire, most are eligible for retirement when their years of service and age add up to 80. In other words, a 55-year-old with 25 years of employment could retire with full benefits. The report shows that the most common ages for LAUSD employees to retire are between 59 and 61.

As Marc Joffe, a senior policy analyst for the Reason Foundation (which publishes this blog), wrote last year in the Orange County Register, the LAUSD’s OPEB costs per student are much higher than several other large California school districts. For the 2016 school year, LAUSD paid $525 per student for OPEBs compared to $81 at Irvine Unified, $29 at San Diego Unified, and $0 at Oakland Unified, which does not subsidize retiree health insurance coverage at all. Unlike most other districts, the LAUSD provides the same health coverage for employees and retirees, with neither group paying premiums for their insurance. By contrast, retirees in Oakland pay their full health insurance premiums.

If the LAUSD required employees and retirees to cover just 10 percent of the health insurance premiums, the district could save $54 million annually, according to a 2015 report from the district’s Independent Financial Review Panel.

And as the Los Angeles Times editorial board noted in November, even a supposed “freeze” on health care spending wasn’t much of a freeze. “That doesn’t mean its expenses will stay the same; instead, the district will withdraw dollars from a healthcare reserve to cover the higher costs, rather than spending out of the general fund,” the paper explained.

The arrangement, the Times said, was “like saying it’ll be easier to talk about buying health insurance after you’re in the hospital.”

If the forthcoming report from Aon Hewitt is any indication, the school district should be calling a metaphorical ambulance.


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories


Top Global

Top Alternative



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.