Doc Expert Appeals: Seeks Grand Jury; Illegitimate Obama's Forgeries

By this Petition, Vogt seeks issuance of three writs of mandamus directed to Judge James L. Robart directing him to: (i) correct the docket in the District Court to accurately reflect the proceedings below, (ii) acknowledge Vogt’s discharge of his obligations under the Misprision statutes, and (iii) in so much as the “public interest so requires”, summon a grand jury to hear Vogt’s forensic evidence which demonstrates that the Certificates of Live Birth (“COLBs”) proffered by Barack Hussein Obama, II (“Obama”) to prove his eligibility to be President are indisputably forgeries.

First, whether Judge Robart has violated his inherent duty to control his docket to preserve its integrity by permitting the Clerk to misrepresent the proceedings below and thereafter, though advised of the misrepresentation by Vogt, failing to correct the misrepresentation thereby undermining the Congressional purpose resident in 18 U.S.C. §2071(b) – “Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally”.

Second, whether Vogt is entitled to an acknowledgment from Judge Robart that Vogt has discharged his obligations arising from 18 U.S.C. §4 – Misprision of Felony and/or 18 U.S.C. §2382 – Misprision of Treason.

Last, whether Judge Robart must, due to his abdication of the judicial function imposed upon him by Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 6(a), be ordered to summon a grand jury given that the forgery of Obama’s COLBs is an issue “of great public importance”.

On October, 18, 2013, Vogt presented to the Clerk for filing as a Miscellaneous matter a document captioned “In Re: Douglas Vogt” and titled: “Notice of Commission of (i) a Felony Cognizable by a Court of the United States as required by 18 USC §4 — Misprision of Felony and (ii) Treason against the United States as required by 18 USC § 2382 – Misprision of Treason and Motion to Seal Document” (“Notice of Commission” attached hereto as Exhibit “A”). Attached to the Notice of Commission was Vogt’s publicly-available, 95-page affidavit in which he demonstrated forensically the existence of twenty (20) separate points of forgery in Obama’s COLBs. In addition to the 95 page affidavit, Vogt also filed under seal a 75-page affidavit in which he identified the person who forged Obama’s COLBs and traced those forgeries to Obama. The matter was docketed as Case No.: C13-1880 and assigned to Judge Robart.

In the Notice of Commission, Vogt sought three actions from a federal district court judge: First, an acknowledgment that Vogt had discharged his obligations under the Misprision statutes. Second, that given the obvious “public interest” in preserving the integrity of the Office of the President from a pretender, the district court summon a grand jury to consider the public and sealed affidavits of Vogt. Last, that Vogt’s sealed affidavit continue to be sealed from public view to prevent the spoilation of evidence that doubtlessly would occur if that affidavit were made public. However, the Clerk did not accurately record the Notice of Commission on the docket. Instead, the Clerk renamed the Notice of Commission as “COMPLAINT against defendant(s)”. Additionally, though Vogt had not sought to sue anyone, the Clerk listed on the Docket as defendants all those referenced in the Notice of Commission. See: Docket attached hereto as Exhibit “B”.

On November 5, 2013, Judge Robart issued his “Order to Show Cause Regarding Subject Matter Jurisdiction”. That Order required Vogt to “show cause within 20 days of the date of this order why his complaint should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.” Notably, Judge Robart commenced the Order by misstating: “Before the court is Plaintiff Douglas Vogt’s complaint in which he alleges that the certificates of live birth from the State of Hawaii that President Barack Obama has publicly released are forgeries.” (Emphasis added). See: Exhibit “C” attached hereto.

In response, on November 12, 2013, Vogt filed his “Response to Order to Show Cause” in which he explicitly stated: “Vogt sought not to: (i) file a complaint, (ii) invoke the jurisdiction of the Court under Article III to resolve a “case” or “controversy”, nor (iii) seek any relief against Barack Hussein Obama, II. . . . Moreover, while Vogt did not caption his Notice of Commission Vogt v. Obama, the Clerk – and now this Court – has done so. This misrepresentation of the record calls into question whether there has been a violation of 18 U.S.C. §2071(b) – Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally.” Finally, Vogt again prayed that Judge Robart: “formally recognize that Vogt has discharged his duty under the Misprision statutes” and “due to the ‘public interest’ in the allegations contained in Vogt’s public affidavit and presently-sealed affidavit, superintend those affidavits to the Grand Jury for their consideration.”

On November 14, 2013, Judge Robart entered his “Order Dismissing Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction”. A copy of the Order is attached hereto as Exhibit “D”. Judge Robart commenced his order by claiming: “Before the court is Plaintiff Douglas Vogt’s complaint in which he alleges that the certificates of live birth from the State of Hawaii that President Barack Obama has publicly released are forgeries.” (Emphasis added).

PETITION CONTINUED  BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/187132805

BACKGROUND REPORTS: http://www.birtherreport.com/search?q=Doug+Vogt