obama birth certificate: obots separated by birth

this may seem like a small thing, but in the birther sphere it’s interesting.

i was rereading some discussion at john woodman’s site. woodman as you will remember, appeared on the scene to “scientifically” debunk the longform as fraudulent theory.

this poster (a Ph. d. in math) submitted this, in response to one of my queries.

Scott,

The official record is not in a vault–it’s on a hard drive (plus other secure backup, I assume). In other words, the official record is data not a document. If you disagree with my methodology then explain how it is incorrect–otherwise I have described how one can arrive at the estimate of 0% empirically. What you or anyone else feels about it is of no significance whatsoever. Science isn’t about who proposed a theory or what others think about it–it’s about whether or not the theory is logically correct and stands up to an experiment with the potential to falsify it.

http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/07/exclusive-new-girl-confirms-her-parents-race-and-i-crack-the-actual-entries-confirming-that-arpaios-codes-dont-match-the-hawaii-codes-either/

i guess i just missed it, but there seems to be some disagreement, even for the obots seprated by birth.

now remember this is a Ph.d. obot, one of the regular players at multiple sites.

woodman is no longer in the business, i have always felt that he was a plant. a non expert, self proclaimed conservative brought in to solve the mystery. i personally think that the entire story of obtaining the longform, and the press conference that went with it are contrived, as a distraction. a rabbit to chase, so to speak. 

obots and birthers are still being outed, even after all these years. this is the most scattered and mysterious stories i have ever encountered. and it never seems to go away.

stay tuned i think there is more birth certificate info on the way.