Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By fousesquawk (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Obama’s Shameful Words Before the UN

Thursday, September 22, 2016 13:10
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Hat tip Constitution.com


“We have to put our money where our mouths are. And we can only realize the promise of this institution’s founding to replace the ravages of war with cooperation if powerful nations like my own accept constraints. Sometimes I’m criticized in my own country for professing a belief in international norms and multilateral institutions, but I’m convinced in the long run giving up some freedom of action, not giving up our ability to protect ourselves or pursue our core interests but binding ourselves to international rules, over the long-term, enhances our security.” — President Barack Obama

We could not have seen more of a contrast between a real leader, Benjamin Netanyuhu, and our pathetic excuse for a leader, Barack Obama. All you have to do is contrast their words before the UN. Netanyahu rightfully called the UN a body that had begun as a moral force and was now a moral farce. Obama on the other hand explicitly advocated Americans giving up their rights, which are unique to this country, in order to submit to international bodies like the UN. You can access the full speech below.

http://constitution.com/obama-speech-un-general-assembly-americans-must-give-freedom/

The UN is made up of some 170 nations, the overwhelming majority of which are not democracies. Many of them routinely violate human rights. Many of them are anti-America. The largest bloc in the UN is the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, a 56-nation bloc that in recent years has been pushing for the UN to pass a measure obligating the member nations to pass laws criminalizing criticism of Islam. Hillary Clinton, while she was secretary of state, held at least two closed door meetings with the OIC in Istanbul and Washington to discuss the matter. As we speak,  European governments are prosecuting their citizens for any speech critical of Islam and the horrific crime and terror problems that the out of control migration is bringing. Can we be far behind?

If Hillary Clinton becomes president, she will surely have 2-3 Supreme Court picks fall in her lap. You know what kind of justices she will pick. Is it not possible she will pick judges sympathetic to laws against speech criticizing Islam?

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.