Guest post by Suzann Darnell
Hypocrisy often factors into things I consider to be among my pet peeves. Liberals and celebrities are frequently steeped in hypocrisy. In sooo many areas! But, I am opting to sorta kinda confine myself to just one. Okay, maybe it bleeds over a bit into two areas . . . however, they are closely connected. Ummm, maybe three. But, really who’s counting?
Anyone supporting abortion I find annoying enough. In fact, to be perfectly honest, I find them rather appalling. But, the liberal celebs who showcase all their social and political views for the entire world to see at all times, really tick me off with their contradictory stances on sanctity of life. It very much depends on which lives are being considered worth saving. Even as they get on board with Blacks Lives Matter or All Lives Matter, they are fully supportive of Planned Parenthood abortion clinics which are all too often set up in minority neighborhoods.
So many of the liberal celebrities are involved in charities to save some endangered animal, their favorite animal, or even ALL animals. This ranges from wildlife protection projects to pushing for worldwide veganism. There are those who think we should not wear fur or leather, should not eat animal products of any kind, or even keep pets and livestock.
Another favorite mission of some liberal celebrities is protecting Mother Nature. They will protest logging, mining, pipelines, and all manner of businesses that they deem to be the raping and pillaging of our planet. Some go so far as to chain themselves to trees to save the trees, the owls, the lizards, or whatever is the celeb cause of the week. There are even those who claim trees feel pain when being chopped down.
Yet, these people who want to protect animals, trees, and even the land, do not not care about unborn human babies! They will protest the killing of baby seals one week, then go out to campaign for someone who is Pro-Choice, which means pro-abortion and in favor of murdering unborn children the next week.
Let me get this straight? Trees might feel pain, but unborn humans don't??? It is absolutely wrong to eat unborn chicken fetuses (AKA: eggs), but perfectly fine to kill unborn human fetuses (AKA: babies)? Using milk or cheese, which does not require the killing of a cow or a goat, is inhumane, but abortions which do require killing of human babies are humanitarian? Hmmm? Seems entirely illogical and contradictory to me.
Don’t get me wrong, I love trees, animals, and Mother Earth. But, I also love babies. I further acknowledge that the Lord put plants, animals, and the earth here for the use of all mankind. While we have a duty to be good stewards, we also have a right to make use of the abundance given to us by the Lord. Most importantly, I do not consider humanity to be a blight upon the face of the earth. I consider people to be God’s crowning achievement in creation. We are His children. And, everyone one of those little unborn human fetuses (AKA: babies) is a child of God! Who are we to take the life from any of His little ones???
But, the hypocrites who are the liberal celebrities trying to make social policy, consider animals, the earth, and even trees to be far more important than even a single human baby. In fact, they are fighting for abortions to be more widespread and less humane with each and every Progressive politician they put in office. I am truly more than just peeved about this. I am angry. Angry for the lost little lives. I hope you are too. Angry enough to vote for Trump and help keep Hillary and her ilk from enacting legislation that will allow wholesale, unrestricted slaughter of America’s future generations.
Read more by Suzann here.