Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

DOJ refuses to prosecute EPA in Animas River disaster

Saturday, October 15, 2016 3:23
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

We all remember the BP oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010, where 5 million gallons of oil were spewed and 11 workers were killed. Obama and former cabinet member Eric Holder couldn’t wait to file criminal and/or civil charges against BP before all the evidence was in.

Now we had another national disaster: this one on August 5 of 2015, which was caused by one of Obama’s cabinet members: Gina McCarthy who heads EPA. She had a crew which accidentally breeched a wall in an abandoned mine in Colorado, spilling over 3 million gallons of contaminated water into several rivers. The crew was supposed to be at the Gold King mine to clean it up, NOT to release 80 miles of toxic sludge:

Animas river spill picture

Well if the DOJ wouldn’t prosecute Hillary Clinton for her unauthorized server, did we really think they would do so to the EPA? Now that of course, is a rhetorical question.

The EPA inspector announced Wednesday (October 12) that it found evidence an unnamed employee may have violated the Clean Water Act and given false statements. But spokesman Jeff Ladga said the Justice Department will not pursue the case. Instead, the case will be sent to the agency’s leaders.

Three prominent House Republicans, Rep. Rob Bishop (R-UT) who heads the House Natural Resources Committee, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) of the House Oversight Committee, and oversight subcommittee chairwoman Rep. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY); sent a letter to Attorney General Loretta Lynch:

“By not taking up the case, the Department of Justice looks like it is going easy on its colleagues in EPA,” [sic] “Its lack of action on these charges give the appearance of hypocrisy, and seem to indicate that there is one set of rules for private citizens and another for the federal government.”

They are requesting a meeting with Lynch by October 26 as to why she has declined to prosecute. The Associated Press had announced after the spill the EPA knew of the catastrophic potential they may be causing but plowed ahead any how. And last month according to an ABC report the EPA designated the Gold King Mine as a “Superfund” site.

According to Wiki:

Superfund sites are polluted locations requiring a long-term response to clean up hazardous material contaminations.

Ironically, the EPA caused this one and refuses to take responsibility for its recklessness. And of course the taxpayers will be footing the bill.

I wouldn’t hold your breath Lynch will change her mind.

No EPA

Share

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.