Profile image
By Freedomworks (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

FreedomWorks Opposes Proposed House Rule Change

Friday, October 7, 2016 9:10
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

FreedomWorks today voiced strong opposition to a change to the rules of the House of Representatives proposed by Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.). The proposed rule change would dissolve the privileged status of the “motion to vacate the chair,” by which an individual member could make the motion from the floor and force a vote to vacate the office of the Speaker of the House, and require a majority of a party’s conference to introduce the motion.

“The motion to vacate the chair is the most powerful tool members of the House have to ensure that the speaker is kept in check. It’s the sword of Damocles that hangs over the head of whomever happens to hold the office,” said FreedomWorks CEO Adam Brandon. “This tool, which is part of the House rules written by Thomas Jefferson, should not be altered under any circumstances.”

“Sadly, Rep. Nunes has been working to limit the democratic prerogatives of the members of the House of Representatives. He has introduced a proposal that would limit the ability of House members to choose a new Speaker of the House,” Brandon said. “Rep. Nunes proposed a roadblock: before the motion can be brought up in the House, that member’s party conference in the House would have to sign off on moving ahead. And since these entities are controlled by either the speaker or the minority leader, approval just won’t happen. That is exactly what Rep. Nunes wants.”

In July 2015, Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) filed a motion to vacate the chair when John Boehner (R-Ohio) held the Speaker’s gavel, citing Boehner’s consolidation of power, proclivity for governing by crisis, and punishment of members “who vote according to their conscience.” Boehner announced his retirement from the House in September 2015 and resigned from office.

While a vote was not held on Rep. Meadows’ motion, it’s likely that enough House Republicans would have voted for another candidate for Speaker to force a second ballot, which would have effectively served as a vote of no confidence in Boehner, or Boehner would have had to rely on House Democrats to salvage his speakership.

“It was the House Freedom Caucus who wanted Speaker Boehner removed, and it was Rep. Meadows who pressed the issue. Rep. Nunes once called these constitutional conservatives ‘lemmings with suicide vests.’ Instead of respecting his colleagues, their parliamentary prerogatives, and their constituents, he seeks to do the work of the status quo and thwart them,” Brandon added.

FreedomWorks aims to educate, build, and mobilize the largest network of activists advocating the principles of smaller government, lower taxes, free markets, personal liberty and the rule of law. For more information, please visit or contact Jason Pye at


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global


Top Alternative




Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.