Jessica Leeds: Trump Accuser Busted by Lou Dobbs
By Jim Stone, Deplorable Freelance Journalist
Jessica Leeds
A 74 year old woman who says Trump groped her in the 80′s. Can’t name the flight, the date, where she was going, NOTHING.Can’t explain why Trump would ever grope a woman much older than him and TOTALLY over the hill at the time. Shed have been TOO OLD by a LONG SHOT.
UPDATE: FOX NEWS HOST LOU DOBBS TWEETED JESSICA’S PHONE NUMBER AND ADDRESS, SAYING THE NUMBER MATCHED THE CLINTON FOUNDATION. THE TWEET HAS BEEN EXPUNGED AND IT SEEMS IMPOSSIBLE TO GET A CAPTURE OF THE TWEET, WHICH CONTAINED THE FULL NUMBER. LOU (soon to be dead) DOBBS DID NOT SCREW THIS UP EVEN THOUGH THEY SAY HE DID, IF HE REALLY DID THEY WOULD HAVE LAUGHED, CENSORED NOTHING AND USED HIS REPORT TO DESTROY HIM. THE TWEET WOULD HAVE STAYED AS IS. THIS, ALONG WITH THE SUBSEQUENT TOTAL EXPUNGEMENT PROVES JESSICA REALLY IS A CLINTON FOUNDATION HACK.
Here is an incomplete number for Jessica Leeds that we CAN get ahold of. Since Lou Dobbs had the whole thing, and said it was from the clinton foundation, we really don’t need more than this because Lou Dobbs (soon to be dead) has enough credibility to go with, even if censored.
The capture to the left here is what the source Lou Dobbs posted looked like. It is NOT from the same source as the capture above, which had incomplete information, so the claim about incomplete information or incorrect information cannot be made. If they wanted to make that claim, THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE CENSORED HIM.
She claimed he lifted the arm rest. Obviously she’s never flown first class then, especially in the 80′s when each seat was isolated with an immovable barrier that was wide and held many things. Most planes are the same way, even now.
Perhaps this is the biggest Jessica Leeds bust OF ALL: RIGHT NOW, in 2016, Melania Trump is 46 years old. In 1989, Jessica Leeds was 47 years old. And Trump supposedly preferred young girls? No need to preach to the choir more, this web site is not read by idiots.
http://82.221.129.208/basepagel3.html
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
| Online: | |
| Visits: | 1,605,711,833 |
| Stories: | 8,138,082 |
Whistler Blowers, Insiders
thank god for participation trophy morons.. yes those who got a trophy for participating instead of actually producing the work, are on hillary’s team! hence the debacles and screw ups.. they were never expected or taught to double check their work, making sure it was accurate!
BE THANKFUL THAT THEY ARE ALL IDIOTS!
True. This is what happens when you give everyone a participation trophy to make everyone feel special. Am3riKa hasn’t taught them shit.
It is not so much that they are idiots, they are very calculating and sly, as they consider us imbeciles !
I have always liked Lou Dobbs and he comes through again. I just pray the good guys can win. The stress on the 70 year old Mr Trump we are counting on to save America is tremendous but he seems to have an angel guiding him. I pray for him. America and the good guys left.
ANOTHER CONFLICT!
ALSO, why did she imply that “only after he tried to slip his hands under my dress” did she get ticked? So what does that mean? Does it mean she was willing to let him kiss him, put his hands all over/under her blouse, and she was 100% complient and happy with it up to that point? And she claims only when he put his hand under her skirt, did she feel uncomfortable?
We know this is a straight out lie, and if you look at the video of her, notice she sat and played her crotch and mimic’s that Michael Douglas Movie, where that woman (Stone) was seducing the investiagors or in this case, the camera with showing her crotch? Look again and you’ll see her sitting and spreading her legs and movement….
Also why then did she allow any man to hold her hand, caress, kiss, deep kiss, then let him slide his hands over her breasts? So she didn’t claim in any way that “upset” her, but only when he tried to put his hand under her dress. If this was the case, wouldn’t she have been outraged before the kissing, holding hands, hands on breasts? Isn’t is only 100% logical that any woman would have cut it off at the first touch, and not after then it already happened, and it moved up levels?
Clearly, a brainwashed hor. Someone needs to see her past jobs, and her connections within the criminal Clinton and Dem party… I’m sure she slept with Little Willy…. And lets not forget about the 2+ children that are Slick Willies children. A 16 year old little girl and that young African American child, that I believe lives in DC or Little Rock….
Lou Dobbs and Hannity are simply the BEST OF THE BEST!
That Maddow lezzy use to be good, but she must be having lots of off camera pressures that she’s 100% backing and changing to support Clinton. Or is she just had a hard time with her girlfriend wife? She’s definately not the same person as last year, so she was infected by Clinton…
Kennedy is great and has a great sense of humor and I like her twists. I never liked her on MTV, but now, she’s redeemed herself…
Kelly is a guttr ccc hut. Her riched billionaire daddy paid FOX to get her on TV, and yes, if you look, she is Blood/family related to the Rothschild family. That should say it all on her… She is and was a little girl who her parents gave her as a virgin to them, as a little virgin girl. Fact. Ever ask what her faather does/did, and how they became 100s of millions of $, and lives in the elite area? Yeah, look at her dad’s Rothschilds connections, who gave them all their riches, and for their thanks back, they offered Kelly to them as a young little girl. She is as satanic as they come, and was formed from birth to follow the Rothschilds….
Can someone post new info about jessica leeds?
She was involved in a property dispute with trump in 2007.
A guy in england said he was sitting opposite them when the incident happened and he said she came on trump not him on her.
They way Trump is handling these ‘False’ accusations is not how a president should handle things. He isn’t taking slings an arrows, just him hitting his head against the wall …
even bill clinton handled this better… heck even HC is handling better with Trump’s BC sexcapades accusations
This just Leeds to more of their lies
Just wishful thinking from an old, wishing she had the equipment to make him want her. Fantasy.
Ancient (Tolstoy’s) Russian Kings Line:Apocalypse Final Armageddon Against Antichrist Obama: Messiah Appears (Video) /alternative/2016/10/ancient-line-of-tolstoys-russian-rulers-in-apocalypse-final-armageddon-against-antichrist-obama-messiah-appears-video-3425526.html
Does Donald Trump First Class “Groping Accuser” Have a History of Conflict With Trump Property?….
Posted on October 14, 2016 by sundance
Developing story… The New York Times dropped their explosive accusation story about a first-class airline passenger named Jessica Leeds who claimed Donald Trump groped her 30 years ago. The two New York Times reporters for the accusation, Michael Barbaro and Megan Twohey, have a history of questionable reporting about Donald Trump.
Research discovers two additional Donald Trump connected stories with the exact name “Jessica Leeds” attached, and -adjusted for chronology- the same age as the NYT report.
♦ The first is an article in the New York Daily News dated October 7th, 2007 – surrounding a Trump owned golf course property in Rancho Palos Verdes, California where the golf course erected trees to mitigate the visual appearance of distressed property:
[…] The glitzy New York mogul readily admits he considers some of the sunbleached, 1950s-style bungalows overlooking his world-class Palos Verdes golf course shabby-chic eyesores.
So he planted a monolithic wall of fast-growing ficus trees as a “temporary” screen for a Michael Douglas tournament held in April, and then never took it out.
Well, the trees have begun blocking the priceless – and protected – ocean views of this scrappy town and irate homeowners are fighting back.
[…] “These views are one of the great beauties of America. The trees are impairing views on public hiking and biking trails. That’s much more important to the public good than what some golfers consider an ugly house,” complained resident Lenee Bilski, 63.
“We can watch the whales go by, the pelicans go fishing, the kite surfers. It’s an idyllic life…and now Donald Trump comes along and takes that away,” said Jessica Leeds, 62, whose million-dollar property was singled out in Trump paperwork as particularly homely. (read more)
♦ The second story containing Jessica Leeds, is related to the same Rancho Palos Verdes golf course and a fence dispute between the Trump property and Jessica Leeds personally. The second story is in the LA Times dated October 30th, 2008.
The title of the story is “The verdict in Rancho Palos Verdes: Don’t mess with the Donald“:
(LA Times) The homeowner, Jessica Leeds, has property that borders on Trump’s golf course development, and had been in negotiations with the Trump organization, which was arguing that her fence was actually in Trump’s property. She says she believed the two sides were in the process of negotiating a solution when a construction crew showed up last Thursday.
“All of a sudden, they were here with their bulldozers taking down the fence, removing and destroying landscape, trees, a walking path, a storage unit just bulldozing through the whole thing,” Jessica Leeds told the Palos Verdes Peninsula News. “They had a surveyor here [who] moved the old fence and put up the fence with some new posts at that supposed property line which I’m not sure whether it is or not without even giving me a survey, without even calling me, without even sending a letter, no notification.”
According to David Conforti, the general manager of the Trump-owned course, the action taken on Thursday was to recoup their land.
We’re simply reclaiming what is legally, rightfully ours, Conforti said on Friday. [Leeds] certainly had the forewarning. It was a few months old. There was nothing ripped out. What we simply did was remove the fence and then reinstall it on the property line.
The Trump Organization last winter sent a letter stating that Leeds had 10 or 14 days to move the fence herself, which she did not do, Conforti said. (link)
If the Palos Verdes Jessica Leeds is the same Jessica Leeds in the New York Times accusations, it certainly raises the question of an undisclosed personal motive, anger over the past, and/or a probable axe-to-grind.
What are the odds this is two different women with the exact same name, of the same age?
One way to look at this is the New York Times accusation itself holds ZERO evidence of the accusation other than the individual word of the accuser, Jessica Leeds.
Surely, Michael Barbaro and Megan Twohey, would have done a simple google search for media reports containing “Jessica Leeds and Donald Trump” as key words and found these stories.
Surely they would have already asked Jessica Leeds if she was the same disgruntled property owner from 2007 and 2008.
Surely Mr. Barbaro and Ms. Twohey would have not been in such a rush with such an explosive accusation they would have overlooked the most rudimentary of search engine fact-checking?
Surely?
Right?