Project Veritas Action, the organization founded by James O’Keefe to investigate and expose corruption and waste in government, just dropped a new bombshell video on the Democratic Party – and in this one, Hillary Clinton herself could find herself in hot water, facing charges of election rigging.
As Project Veritas explained:
“Project Veritas Action has released the third video in a multi-part series that is sending shockwaves through the DNC and the Clinton campaign. The first video explained the dark secrets and the hidden connections and organizations the Clinton campaign uses to incite violence at Trump rallies. The second video exposed a diabolical step-by-step voter fraud strategy discussed by top Democratic operatives and showed one key operative admitting that the Democrats have been rigging elections for fifty years. This latest video takes this investigation even further.”
So what exactly does this third video reveal?
The undercover investigation highlighted by this clip actually goes into the back rooms of Democratic operations and finds Hillary Clinton’s campaign seems to have engaged in unlawful discussions with the Democratic National Committee and a nonprofit called Americans United for Change.
And as Project Veritas found, the discussions were disguised as a duck – meaning, the speakers used coded language to mask their true intents. But the finding sends shockwaves: The video clips seem to reveal that the political messaging group, Democracy Partners, and its founder Robert Creamer finger Clinton with FEC violations.
From Project Veritas:
“Several Project Veritas Action undercover journalists catch Democracy Partners founder directly implicating Hillary Clinton in FEC violations.
“‘In the end, it was the candidate, Hillary Clinton, the future president of the United States, who wanted ducks on the ground,’ says Creamer in one of several exchanges. ‘So, by God, we would get ducks on the ground.’
“It is made clear that high-level DNC operative Creamer realized that this direct coordination between Democracy Partners and the campaign would be damning when he said: ‘Don’t repeat that to anybody.’
“It was earlier this year when people wearing Donald Duck costumes started showing up at Donald Trump events all over the country. Brad Woodhouse is the president of Americans United for Change (AUFC) and he worked with Robert Creamer, Scott Foval, and DNC Rapid Response Coordinator Aaron Black to launch their ‘Donald Ducks’ campaign.
“After the first video in this series, Woodhouse fired Scott Foval, his national field director.
“In the video, the operatives go on to explain their plot.
“‘Let me tell you something. I think she [Hillary Clinton] has the right instinct on this. This thing is resonating, but that story is not exactly what you want to hear about how presidential decision-making happened,’ said Woodhouse.
“However, the originator of the Donald Ducks scheme was supposed to remain secret.
“Robert Creamer goes on to add, ‘I was actually on a plane to go to London last week – Christina Reynolds [Deputy Communications Director for Hillary for America] calls saying, ‘I have good news and bad news. The good news is the candidate would like to have a mascot following around the duck – I mean, Trump.’
“Creamer then says, ‘If the future president wants ducks, we will put ducks on the ground.’
“Hillary Clinton and the DNC wanted the Donald Ducks agitators at Trump and Pence campaign events. The direct involvement of the campaign and the Democratic National Committee with Americans United for Change and activists wearing Donald Duck costumes smacks strongly of illegal coordinated campaign expenditures.
“Federal campaign law experts have told us ‘the ducks on the ground are likely public communications for purposes of the law. It’s political activity opposing Trump, paid for by Americans United for Change funds but controlled by Clinton and her campaign.’”
Once again, from Project Veritas:
“Representatives of Clinton’s campaign were on daily conference calls which PVA journalists witnessed with Creamer, AUFC managers and their operatives. They were talking about where to send the duck and the ‘ducks message.’ Not only was the campaign in on it, but apparently Donna Brazille’s Democratic National Committee was in on it as well.”