Profile image
By Anonymous (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Arthur Sulzberger of New York Times Vows to Stop Lying About News

Monday, November 14, 2016 2:57
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News) Arthur Sulzberger, editor of The New York Times has vowed to become a better media outlet. Apparently Sulzberger figured out that lying about the news is not exactly news.

The “come to Jesus” revelation might have something to do with Trump becoming president in spite of the media misconduct?

There are few things as sure as the sun rising in the east and setting in the west, and that is the media’s hatred of Conservatives and Republicans. So despite what the Arthur Sulzberger said, the lamestream media will continue to hate us. They can’t be trusted.

Nevertheless, as FOX News reports,

The publisher of The New York Times penned a letter to readers Friday promising that the paper would “reflect” on its coverage of this year’s election while rededicating itself to reporting on “America and the world” honestly.

Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr., the paper’s embattled publisher, appealed to Times readers for their continued support.

“We cannot deliver the independent, original journalism for which we are known without the loyalty of our subscribers,” the letter states.

Twitter link to the letter:

nyt-publisher-letterSo it took Trump winning for the New York Times to believe that people cared about more than Liberal nonsense?

I think it was their financial report.

The growth of digital for the NYT has slowed to a crawl. The paper recently shut down its press operations in Paris, an obvious indicator that print medium is waning.

In the 2nd quarter of 2016, the NYT lost $500,000. This is compared to a $16 million profit in the same quarter a year earlier.

Regardless, if the New York Times is serious about its mea culpa, I suggest it begin by correcting the record on all the FAKE stories and narratives it promoted during the 2016 campaign.

Next, the NYT should admit to collusion with Leftists, including the Clinton campaign.

If they offered to do either of these, I would take them seriously. Otherwise, I consider this a strategic move to try to get Conservatives to trust them.


Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global


Top Alternative




Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.