Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By The Black Sphere (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Hillary Clinton and Her History of Accepting Unethical Donations

Thursday, November 10, 2016 10:33
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

http://google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?tpl=safari&site=theblacksphere.net&hl=en-us Hillary Clinton claims to be a feminist, but I find her to be very bad at her role.

Hillary Clinton beguiles American Liberal women with her tails of adventures in protecting the softer sex. We know that’s not true, as Hillary practically served up women to her rapist husband. But if you think Hillary is bad state-side, when she’s in Muslim countries, she rolls over on women like a trained seal.

Hillary Clinton knows that women are profitable on the political black market, especially in Muslim countries.

As NY Magazine reported,

The thousands of hacked Clinton campaign emails included at least one about a $1 million donation that Qatar wanted to give the Clinton Foundation in 2012 honor of Bill’s 65th birthday the previous year. Officials wanted to meet with the former president in New York to give him the check, though it’s not clear if that get-together ever happened.

But according to a new Reuters report, the Clinton Foundation confirms that it did accept the $1 million gift from Qatar in 2012, a time when Hillary Clinton was serving as U.S. Secretary of State. During her tenure, the Clinton Foundation had an agreement with the State Department to disclose any increased or new gifts from foreign government donors while Clinton acted as top diplomat.

The State Department has said previously that it has no record of any report about a 2012 contribution from Qatar. A spokesman for the Clinton Foundation told Reuters that it took the $1 million Qatari gift; however, that particular gift wasn’t a “material increase” from previous years.

We all know what Hillary Clinton will say:

“The gift showed a lapse in judgment. I apologize, and take full responsibility.”

The media will spin it as a simple oversight, and all is well in Crookedville USA.

The article continues,

The information, gleaned from the Wikileaks disclosures, doesn’t help the perception of a potential ethics issues between the Clinton State Department and the family’s foundation – though nothing has shown that donors received any political or policy favors because of contributions when Clinton was Secretary of State. The FBI reportedly began a preliminary investigation into the charity on any possible conflicts of interest, but the Justice Department held at the time that there wasn’t enough evidence to pursue a case.

Aren’t we beyond referring to these large sums of money as “donations?” These are bribes for work to be completed at a later date; like when Hillary theoretically becomes president.

Fortunately for us, that will never happen.

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.