Profile image
By Doug Ross @ Journal (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Bummer: Did President Trump Just Nuke Obamacare with a Single Executive Order?

Wednesday, February 15, 2017 18:31
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

By Josie Wales


B4INREMOTE-aHR0cHM6Ly8zLmJwLmJsb2dzcG90LmNvbS8tWGxUbThKWTVGMkUvV0tUN0tfeU5FdUkvQUFBQUFBQUJzZHMvRVlNSkhKYzVjYzh2bnFER2I3bFh5emI4aDFDNjVHWTlnQ0xjQi9zMTYwLzE3MDIxNS10cnVtcC1leGVjLW9yZGVyLmpwZw==Earlier this month, the IRS made a seemingly insignificant change to its policy, undermining the Obamacare mandate in a very significant way.


For the last several years, individual filers were required by law to fill out line 61 of form 1040, which indicates whether you have maintained coverage or paid the penalty. This is otherwise known as a “shared responsibility statement.” Taxpayers could also claim exemption by filing a 8965 form. Tax returns that don’t indicate coverage status (silent returns) were to be automatically rejected. However, due to an executive order issued by President Trump, that line is now optional, making it incredibly difficult to enforce the Obamacare mandate.

In a statement to Reason, the IRS said:

“The recent executive order directed federal agencies to exercise authority and discretion available to them to reduce potential burden. Consistent with that, the IRS has decided to make changes that would continue to allow electronic and paper returns to be accepted for processing in instances where a taxpayer doesn’t indicate their coverage status.”


Essentially, the mandate’s main enforcement mechanism is no longer enforcing, rendering the health law nearly impotent.

While the IRS maintains the option to follow up with individuals who don’t indicate coverage status, it’s unclear what conditions would prompt a follow-up, and there are concerns surrounding the legality of the change in policy. According to Michael Cannon, health policy director at the Cato Institute, federal law “does not allow the administration not to enforce the mandate, which it appears they may be doing here. Unless the Trump administration maintains the mandate is unconstitutional, the Constitution requires them to enforce it.”

However, Ryan Ellis, a senior fellow at the Conservative Reform Network, says the policy stops just short of refusing to enforce the mandate. “If the IRS turns a blind eye to people’s status, that isn’t quite not enforcing it. It’s more like the IRS wanting to maintain plausible deniability,” he says.

While only Congress can fully repeal the Obamacare mandate, this move by the IRS effectively chops it off at the knees, leaving the people free to elect not to incriminate themselves.

Read more at 


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 1 comment
  • Boo

    Nice to know the IRS is on board with NOT enforcing the Obamacare Tax Penalty Mandate. Love your posts Doug.

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global

Top Alternative



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.