Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By Moonbattery (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Censorship Opponents Oppose Bill to Protect Science Teachers From Censorship

Tuesday, February 21, 2017 11:22
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Interestingly, activists ostensibly devoted to fighting censorship are attacking a bill written to allow science teachers to question official dogma:

The National Coalition Against Censorship and other organizations committed to defending First Amendment rights in schools are objecting to a South Dakota bill deemed by critics to threaten educational standards in science education, particularly in the areas of climate change and global warming.

S.B. 55, termed “[…]An Act to Protect the Teaching of Certain Scientific Information,” is, according to the bill, intended so “no teacher may be prohibited from helping students understand, analyze, critique, or review in an objective scientific manner the strengths and weaknesses of scientific information.”

Why would an opponent of censorship have a problem with this? Because the bill…

…may encourage teachers who object to the scientific consensus on evolution and climate change to bring their opinions into the classroom.

You wouldn’t want awareness of intelligent design or skepticism of the global warming hoax undermining a painstakingly preconstructed worldview, would you?

Proponents of the legislation incorrectly argue that the legislation is necessary to protect free speech and academic freedom. The groups underline that there is no First Amendment justification for legislation that undermines the integrity of science education in the state.

By integrity, they mean fidelity to the official status quo. We can’t have any Galileo types insinuating that the world might be round.

Here’s some twisted reasoning:

The groups [opposed to the bill] maintain that the Constitution protects professional educators and disciplinary experts who develop curricular materials in order to provide students with the necessary knowledge and skills to progress academically and to function as informed citizens.

They seem to be asserting their First Amendment right to silence teachers who deviate from political orthodoxy.

Censorship is like racism, sexism, discrimination, et cetera; it’s only bad when it works against The Agenda.

intelligent-design
What if a teacher let slip that not everyone believes life is a random accident?

On a tip from Lyle.



Source: http://moonbattery.com/?p=81402

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.