She was knifed in a frenzied attack in front of 30 horrified witnesses, while her attacker is alleged to have shouted “Allahu Akbar” during the ordeal.
The mother of a victim of jihad terror says her daughter was not killed by an Islamic terrorist and wrote a nasty letter to President Trump to tell him off.
This was on the front page of CNN:
The mother of a slain British backpacker has written a angry letter to US President Donald Trump after her daughter’s killing in Australia appeared on the White House’s list of 78 under-reported terror attacks. This is exemplar of the left (and Islam for that matter.) Ideology before everything even your children.
A jihadi is stabbing people to death screaming ‘Allahu Akbar’ is the very definition of Islamic terror.
If this is proof of anything it is how very badly the enemedia and government elites have misinformed their constituents for years.
“My daughter’s death will not be used to further this insane persecution of innocent people,” Rosie Ayliffe wrote in a statement posted to Facebook.
I feel sorry for this woman. There is no greater pain or sorrow than the loss of a child. Further she has been deceived by the government. Obama did that for eight years, scrubbed jihad terror from all Islamic terror attacks She reminds me of the 9/11 families (only a small number mind you) who supported the building of a mega mosque at Ground Zero. It’s a sort of Stockholm Syndrome.
Here is reportage from the ”The Sun” about her daughter’s murder:
As the guy stabbed the beautiful young girl, the article quotes a witnesses:
“She was knifed in a frenzied attack in front of 30 horrified witnesses, while her attacker is alleged to have shouted “Allahu Akbar” during the ordeal.”
One Australian reader wrote me this: “30 people heard this and it’s “fake news”? I doubt that. Sounds like a government cover up for jihad yet again. They are very big on that down here – covering up Islamic terror. The Govt. is terrified that the people here will not tolerate their past policies.”
Some of the more unhinged crackpot leftwing sites are blaming me for this. I kid you not,.
Robert Spencer wrote: Murder victim’s father denies killing was jihad terror: “He said ‘Allahu akbar.’ It’s a bit like me saying I’m Jesus Christ.”
In reality, it is nothing whatsoever like saying, “I’m Jesus Christ.” “Allahu akbar” is often mistranslated in the Western media as “God is great.” But the actual meaning is “Allah is greater,” meaning Allah Is Greater Than Your God or Government. It is the aggressive declaration that Allah and Islam are dominant over every other form of government, religion, law or ethic, which is why Islamic jihadists in the midst of killing infidels so often shout it. One primary purpose of shouting is to “strike terror in the hearts of the enemies of Allah” (Qur’an 8:60). See my article in Breitbart about it here.
The other murder victim’s mother wrote: “Much nonsense is being spoken in the press about her alleged killer,” who, she said, “is not an Islamic fundamentalist, he has never set foot in a mosque.” What’s more, “Queensland Police, the Australian Federal Police and the Joint Counter Terrorism Unit … investigated any links between Ayad and radical organisations, and they did not find any evidence of radicalisation.”
This is an example of the prevailing denial and political correctness that hamstrings our approach to jihad terror. Ayad wasn’t carrying an ISIS membership card, and wasn’t going to mosque, and so therefore there was no “evidence of radicalisation,” and President Trump is both stupid and evil to classify these murders as jihad terror. The problem here is that the paradigm that Ayliffe, Jackson, and even the Queensland Police, the Australian Federal Police and the Joint Counter Terrorism Unit are working from is false and erroneous. A Muslim who never goes to mosque and is not otherwise observant may be carrying around a rather large load of guilt. He may know that an easy way to offset all his evil deeds is to perform an act of jihad, as the Qur’an guarantees Paradise to those who “kill and are killed” for Allah (9:111). So in this case, Smail Ayad may indeed have been a bit unbalanced, and unhealthily fixated on Mia Ayliffe-Chung, and troubled by that or any number of other things, and conceived of an easy way to get back into Allah’s good graces: kill her and Tom Jackson. That he stabbed a dog would even be in keeping with this, as Muhammad ordered that dogs be killed: “It was narrated that Abdullah bin Umar said: ‘The Messenger of Allah used to order that dogs be killed, and I went throughout Al-Madinah, and we did not spare any dog but we killed it, to such an extent that we would even kill the dog of a woman belonging to the desert people.’” (Sahih Muslim 4018)
All this doesn’t make Ayad’s murders acts of terrorism akin to 9/11 or Fort Hood or San Bernardino. He probably didn’t think of himself as acting to advance the cause of the Muslim umma, or as an operative of al-Qaeda or the Islamic State. But authorities aren’t even aware of the possibility of killing as an act of personal expiation within Islam, and they should be.